For most players, I believe being fit for clubs is overrated, and may even be counterproductive. The following is my reasoning.
When a fitting client strikes balls the fitter is typically watching the ball flight and then making equipment adjustments to
correct and, or, improve ball flight trajectory, accuracy etc....After the fitting, the player is provided with recommended club specifications which promote his swing faults.
I understand the majority of players do not have the time or inclination to learn fundamentally sound swing technique, but an equipment fitting using swing faults is ingraining same and likely harming the players chances for ever improving his swing technique.
So, the above is about dynamic fitting, which I question.
However, I do believe there is merit to static fitting, which provides club specifications based on a persons height, wrist-to-floor measurements.
In summary, I think static fitting may promote fundamentally sound address position and swing while dynamic fitting
may promote swing faults.
Please reply to this thread with your thoughts, thanks.