Jump to content
GeekingGolf

Snell MTB v Vice Pro Plus

Recommended Posts

Has anyone here played both the Snell MTB and the Vice Pro Plus golf ball. I am currenlty playing the Vice Pro Plus and love it but I usually only purchase a dozen at a time and with shipping comes out to about 41 dollars. I have heard great things about the Snell MTB and am wondering how it compares. The cost is much less at 31.99 and free shipping. I know that the Vice Pro+ is a 4 piece ball and the MTB is a 3 piece ball. Any help would be greatly appreciated. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive wondered the same my self; is the Vice worth the $$$?

I have and do play the Snell MTB. I also Play the Srixon Z. I Have both now and when its time to reload which I will choose I really cant say. Its a matter of convience at this point.

The MTB is as good a ball as you can find, especially for the price, as you may know. A guy I know with 110 to 115 can skin them pretty easy, but he can crack a Volvik too. 

So any more and fwiw I spent 30+ years running golf courses and I have played them all up until last year, when I semi retired and couldnt snag them out of the rough for free all day.

There is the Chrome Soft Truvis that many good players I know are liking saying the eye picks it up better and better shots follow, as well as being easy to find? There is the TP5 that is said to be an amazing ball in the wind? Are they worth it at 40-45 per? The only variable I can truly find for many of the balls I have played is short irons and wedges in. Duh right. But even that is to each his own and the ball that feels right there and will give me that five extra past the flag when I need it to is the ball I use. Trackman and the rest are as much about selling golf balls as anything else while I myself plan to get a sleeve of Truvis, and drop them with my regular ball and hit 2 into the green and see. The truth is on the golf course. And I sure do miss all the free balls. :blink:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone here played both the Snell MTB and the Vice Pro Plus golf ball. I am currenlty playing the Vice Pro Plus and love it but I usually only purchase a dozen at a time and with shipping comes out to about 41 dollars. I have heard great things about the Snell MTB and am wondering how it compares. The cost is much less at 31.99 and free shipping. I know that the Vice Pro+ is a 4 piece ball and the MTB is a 3 piece ball. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

I would say the snell fits between the pro and pro plus, closer to the pro.

 

I give feel to the snell- it feels better off every club by that I mean softer.

 

Both have a good strong flight off the tee, distance its kind of a wash between them.

 

150yds and in aren't that different, I'd say the height and spin from the snell are higher. Both hold greens. I don't problem holding greens from 200yds and in.

 

Off the putter I love the snell hands down.

 

 

I'm not currently using the snell because I got a few dozen of the pro plus at a cheap price.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using MyGolfSpy

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone here played both the Snell MTB and the Vice Pro Plus golf ball. I am currenlty playing the Vice Pro Plus and love it but I usually only purchase a dozen at a time and with shipping comes out to about 41 dollars. I have heard great things about the Snell MTB and am wondering how it compares. The cost is much less at 31.99 and free shipping. I know that the Vice Pro+ is a 4 piece ball and the MTB is a 3 piece ball. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

I have played both and prefer the Vice. The ball flight is more "true" for my game If that makes sense. The Snell flew high and just didn't suit the eye. I know this might sound overly simple, but you're going to go through balls regardless, why don't you order a few dozen and take advantage of the discounts..

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have played both and prefer the Vice. The ball flight is more "true" for my game If that makes sense. The Snell flew high and just didn't suit the eye. I know this might sound overly simple, but you're going to go through balls regardless, why don't you order a few dozen and take advantage of the discounts..

I agree I think that is what I am going to do next time honestly wish it was softer off the putter but best ball flight for my game

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using MyGolfSpy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I play and currently have both balls. Extremely similar. Both at multi dozen deals are great prices.. you won't be disappointed with either

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using MyGolfSpy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought the sampler pack from Vice earlier this year and instantly fell in love with the Vice Pro Plus...hasn't left since...I absolutely love the flight of the golf ball and enough spin...I don't particularly like the feel of the putter face though...now the Chrome Soft feels amazing off the putter...but the first time I used one in a round off the tee hit it directly into the water...so hasn't made another appearance yet...lol

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought the sampler pack from Vice earlier this year and instantly fell in love with the Vice Pro Plus...hasn't left since...I absolutely love the flight of the golf ball and enough spin...I don't particularly like the feel of the putter face though...now the Chrome Soft feels amazing off the putter...but the first time I used one in a round off the tee hit it directly into the water...so hasn't made another appearance yet...lol

I definitely agree with your thoughts on the chrome soft off of the putter. I can instantly tell which ball is a chromesoft if you drop 3 in front of me of different brands. I am hoping the srixon q-star will have a similar feel. MTB has a good feel, but not quite as good. Still a great option

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I definitely agree with your thoughts on the chrome soft off of the putter. I can instantly tell which ball is a chromesoft if you drop 3 in front of me of different brands. I am hoping the srixon q-star will have a similar feel. MTB has a good feel, but not quite as good. Still a great option

Let me know about the q-star after you try it from what I have watched on YouTube Rick Shiels he says always start your ball selection at the green and work your way back

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using MyGolfSpy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bridgestone B330S is in that category and they are $42 a dozen. Haven't tried either the Snell or the Vice.

 

I do like the sounds of the matte finish on the Vice. I missed those dang flamingos... wanted one to display.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using MyGolfSpy

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bridgestone B330S is in that category and they are $42 a dozen. Haven't tried either the Snell or the Vice.

 

I do like the sounds of the matte finish on the Vice. I missed those dang flamingos... wanted one to display.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using MyGolfSpy

Haven't played the Bridgestone balls in many years but the Chrome I have played and it's 40

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using MyGolfSpy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I played the Snell MTB for almost a year and still love the feel of the ball.  Previously, played the Callaway Chromesoft.  

 

I purchased a couple of dozen of the Vice Pro Plus and to me, it just didn't have the same soft feel of the Snell.  Distance off the tee was a little less than the Snell, but the biggest difference was from 150 yards in.  I didn't think it held the green as well as the Snell.  The Snell was just much more predictable on approach and chipping shots.

 

On the green, the Snell was much more reliable.  I'm not sure how this will translate, but the Snell just tracked more reliably.

 

I have since started using the Srixon Q-Star Tour and I find it very comparable to the Snell MTB.  I still think the Snell performs better on the green, but otherwise, I would rate them very similar in every other aspect.

 

Having played the Q-Star for the last couple of months, I may switch back to the Snell to see if there are any aspects of the ball that I am missing out on.  

 

I don't know about anyone else, but I can't make snap comparisons to balls.  I have to use if for a few rounds, then go back to my previous ball and then I feel like I can make a better comparison.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I played the Snell MTB for almost a year and still love the feel of the ball. Previously, played the Callaway Chromesoft.

 

I purchased a couple of dozen of the Vice Pro Plus and to me, it just didn't have the same soft feel of the Snell. Distance off the tee was a little less than the Snell, but the biggest difference was from 150 yards in. I didn't think it held the green as well as the Snell. The Snell was just much more predictable on approach and chipping shots.

 

On the green, the Snell was much more reliable. I'm not sure how this will translate, but the Snell just tracked more reliably.

 

I have since started using the Srixon Q-Star Tour and I find it very comparable to the Snell MTB. I still think the Snell performs better on the green, but otherwise, I would rate them very similar in every other aspect.

 

Having played the Q-Star for the last couple of months, I may switch back to the Snell to see if there are any aspects of the ball that I am missing out on.

 

I don't know about anyone else, but I can't make snap comparisons to balls. I have to use if for a few rounds, then go back to my previous ball and then I feel like I can make a better comparison.

Thanks

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using MyGolfSpy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Daily Deals

  • Sponsors

  • Our Sponsors

     
     
     

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      79,838
    • Most Online
      2,247

    Newest Member
    Matt hitchcock
    Joined
  • Similar Content

    • By Bbaum215
      I made the switch to vice two years ago and have shot some of the best rounds of my life playing the vice pro plus. I have noticed no distance difference between the vice and the taylormade tour preferred x that I played prior to. Want to see if anyone else out there has been playing the vice and your thoughts and how does the vice pro plus compare to the smell mtb black. 
    • By dbdors
      I want to start this by saying that I really like collecting logo golf-balls from courses that I play and sometimes just visit.  I find it a complete bummer to play a new course and they don't have a logo ball.   In additon to new course play, I also have a goal to play at least 9 - 18 holes in all of the 50 states and of course I collect a logo ball from each course.  I've covered 10 states including my home state of Texas.  And my evidence that I played is a logo ball.  But there are times when a course does not have a ball. Like last week, I was working in South Carolina and played two course around the Greenwood area.  I played 18 on one course that I was looking forward too, but once I got there I found out no logo balls.  Fortunately the other course (played 9) did have a ball (so SC was covered).  But still kept that feeling that I needed a ball from the first course I played there.

      I also collect balls for the companies I have worked for other special places/companies/projects, etc. Through spin-offs mergers or changing jobs, I have managed to work for 6 companies.  Five of which I was able to get a ball for while I worked there, but for one I could not find a ball.  I did a lot of searching the web and their company store, but no evidence of a ball was found.

      This got me thinking, "could I use printable water slide decals that the model builders use, to print my own logos and apply them to a ball".  I saw this product once while perusing the model car section of Hobby Lobby.  I used to build models cars as a kid and the water slide film is very thin.

      As you will see it can be done and quite easily.  The process starts with some Testors Clear Printable Decal paper and spray decal bonder/set.  The decal bonder locks the ink to the decal paper and prevents it from running once wet.  If you buy it from Hobby Lobby, make sure you take a 40% off coupon for one item.  The paper is on the expensive side at $12 for 6 sheets of 5.5 X 8.5 paper.  But you should be able to get a bunch of logos from that material.

       


      This is a clear plastic paper that will take printing via an inkjet printer.  I am a photographer by hobby and have a nice photo printer that I print photos with.  But you can use any good quality inkjet printer.  Also there are a number of companies that make printable decal paper (search Amazon or eBay).  All you need is a app to allow the capture and editing of a graphic and printing of the graphic.

      To find a logos, I simply do a google image search for the golf course or company, etc.  Many will have some sort of logo that you can download online.  However one of my old favorite courses (but now closed) did not have a logo.  I did find a picture of a flag from the course so I decided to use that as a logo (assuming that if they ever had a logo, that would likely be it).  Fortunately it is a simple 1 color graphic that I was able to recreate in Power Point.  But again, you wont need Power Point if you have a digital graphic.




      Once you have an image its a simple matter of editing the image and shrinking it down to fit on a golf ball.  I found from some searches that 3/4" - 1" is a good size for a ball logo.  So I set all my logo's to be about 7/8" to 1" wide (they looked the best to my eye, but do test prints, as one size does not work for all logos).  I highly suggest that you print them out on plain paper first.  Cut them out and test fit them to the ball.  If too small, make it larger and test print again.  If too big, then make them smaller and repeat until you get them to the size you want.  But don't waste your decal paper trying to get the sizing correct, test on plain paper first and in black and white to save ink.
      To print them I used MS Word and built a page 5.5" wide by 8.5" long, the same size as the decal paper (but others sell it in 8 1/2" X 11") and Word is very easy to use.  Once I had my image in MS Word, it was a simple matter of sending the print to the printer.  I used photo paper settings with the highest quality.  And print out 2-3 images at a time for each logo, as you might mess up the first decal and have to start over.  Having extras means all you have to do is cut out another.




      Once printed, I let the print dry.  For some printers this can be a few minutes (like mine) or many hours for others.  In order to save on the paper, I cut the printed strip off.  Then sprayed the cut off with a couple of light coats of the decal bonder.  You don't want to spray the entire blank page as I assume you cant print on it again once sprayed (this was not tested by me so I don't know if its true).  I found that I can print on the cutoff remainder just fine down to about 4 inches long.
      The bonder didn't seem to need more that 30 minutes to dry, but there were not instructions on the spray can or the paper package.  I waited 30 min to 1 hour each between coats.  Once the bonder was dry, I cut out the decals and trimmed them close to the edge.  This is not critical since the balls I used were white and any un-printed edge did not show (note, use white balls as you can't print white on most consumer printers and if your logo has a white background it will have to show through the clear).  Also use some cheap balls, unless you have money to burn I wouldn't do these on ProV1's.  I had a bunch of Callaway and Nike balls that I got free that I don't play, (stuff I hit at the range sometimes).





      Finally take small bowl of warm water and let the decal soak to loosen the backing paper.  While soaking I take this time to go wash my hands and the ball with some warm water and hand soap to remove any oils.  I dried my hands but left the ball wet.  This makes it easy to move the water slide decals around.  At this point I gently slide the decal off the backing on to the ball, not using my hands on the sticky side.  You can move the decal around and make sure its in the correct position.  Then gently pat dry with a dry paper towel.



      Once pressed in, I take a q-tip (cotton swab) and roll over the surface to get any excess water out and press in the dimples to push out water as well, then let them dry over night.  The final step is to spray with a light misting of decal bonder to seal the edges (not sure this is called for, but made me feel better anyway).
       
      Below are the first 4 balls I did are from courses I have played and the other is one is of a company where I worked.  Looking at the balls its hard to tell that they are decals.  But you can feel them slightly with your hands.


    • By epsanche23
      New AVX is really something else. Long off the tee, very soft and what you'd expect from a premium Titleist ball around the greens. Really interested to see where this ball will fall in line with the 1/1X. Possibly their new flagship??
       
      Anyone had a chance to try it? 
      For now, its only available in Arizona, California and Florida as a test market.
       
      Here's a look inside the ball at the 3-piece layer construction:

    • By Chadlius88
      Like your typical beginner golfer, I selected my first balls based on the fact that I was likely to lose a lot of them. So for my first round I grabbed 2 boxes of Nitro distance balls at Wally World for 5 bucks per dozen. Yup, lost most of ‘em. But at least I realized pretty quickly that balls sure do make a difference. So I tested several balls as I went along, as my game improved, so did my ball selection until I finally ended up choosing the Srixon Z Star, which is my current gamer, and has been since the middle of last year.
       
      Enter the new Wilson Staff Duo Soft Spin (SSP), promising extra spin around the green and a super soft feel. As a die hard Wilson Staff fan (see my signature for the proof) I just had to give these balls a shot. They are a 3 piece ball with an Ionomer cover.
       
      My initial thoughts are all positive, I think Wilson Staff has created a fantastic ball at a great price point. However, they definitely aren't for everyone, and here's why:
       
      That super soft feel part, holy moly. The balls are only 40 compression, so when you hit ‘em good, you definitely get a rubbery feedback, so if you don't like that sort of a feel, you'll hate these balls. I just so happen to like it; and around the greens it actually provides me with great feedback and improves my touch, but we'll get to that in a sec.
       
      Off the tee on hole 1 at the oaks in Somersworth NH, I hit a 253 yard bomb with my 3 wood. The ball went dead straight over the bunkers that cross the fairway, the ball went high enough that my friends and I lost it in the sky and never saw it down. But as I pulled up I saw that my ball had almost rolled through the fairway but stopped about a foot short, leaving me a lob wedge into the par 4 for my second. Don't get too excited, I ended up 3 putting for a bogie. But this leads me well into the next part.
       
      On approach shots, I had no trouble getting the ball to stop quickly on a course that in notorious for ridiculously fast greens. On hole 11, a par 5 I had another lob wedge into a green with the pin at the front of the green. I caught the fringe and the ball checked up less than a foot from the pin for a tap in birdie.
       
      The ball provided plenty of spin around the green. I had multiple chips that I felt I hit way too hard but the ball checked up quick enough to keep me 10 feet or less from the pin. And the feel was fantastic, I could really tell if I had hit the ball with the right touch.
       
      Off the putter was great as well. I did some of my best putting ever during my first round with this ball. 35 putts, when I average in the 40s on a normal day. The ball felt soft but borderline solid off the putter face with a nice quiet sound, no clicking from this ball.
       
      This ball will definitely be staying in my bag for a while for further testing. But so far I am a huge fan. Plus, now I can say I play all Wilson everythang. Check back for updates.




    • By TinkerGolfMan
      Nike just released customization for the new Tour RZN golf balls. 
       

       
      Anyone ordered?
  • Recent Topics

  • Latest from the Blog

  • Happy Birthday Today!

×
×
  • Create New...