Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Alright forum members, here is the situation: You wake up in the morning, check the forecast really quick and the weatherman calls for clear skies and 75 degrees, with only a gentle breeze of 0 - 5 miles an hour expected for the day. Pristine golf weather. And the rest of the week calls for rain, rain and more rain - you can't let an opportunity like this pass you by! So you call in to the office because you are *cough* *cough* "under the weather" *sniffle* *sniffle*, and then start making the rounds scouring golf now and the internet for a tee time. You find a course you have played a couple times, not a ton, but you remember it being a decent track and are pretty pumped to play it again. So you throw on your favorite golf polo and comfiest golf shorts (or pants, if 75 degree weather is pants weather for you crazy people in Arizona, California, etc.), eat a hearty breakfast, throw your clubs in the trunk of your car and head off to the course. You get to the course, pay the green fee and head off to the first tee box. It's moment of truth time gentlemen (and ladies, but mostly gentlemen in this case) - what tee box are you attacking the course from, and is this the box you should actually be going to battle from?

 

Personally, I used to play from the tee box just in front of the tips most of the time (generally the blue tee boxes on the courses around me). And I generally played there for the following reasons:

 

- When I started golfing, most of the people I played with always played from the blue tees. So I just got used to playing from those boxes.

 

- I can hit the ball pretty far. I am not tour pro long or anything like that,but for average joe golfer I can get the ball out there pretty good, so I thought that was the spot for me.

 

- It is an ego thing. I think I should be able to play from that distance and do it well.

 

- Blue is a much more manly color than white.

 

What I have realized though is that even though the blue tee boxes generally don't make the course too long for my game, I should probably spend more of my time teeing off from the white tee boxes (or the boxes one set behind the ladies tees if your course uses a different coloring system). Why is that? I score way better (and who doesn't have more fun when the score looks good!) Not sub par or low 70's better, but I can generally keep things in the low to mid 80's from there. I also don't have to hit as many shots with long irons or fairway woods to get home on holes, which limits the duffs and skulls and other nonsense I generally rack up throughout the round, which just makes the round more frustrating it needs to be. Golf is hard enough as it is! I also feel better about my pace of play. I don't feel like I am holding people up as much, searching for balls on wayward shots when my swing gets a little handsy, and when I hit a fat shot I am already closer than I was if I were playing from further away. I think the people playing behind me appreciate it more, as I know I get frustrated and out of rhythm when the group in front of me is clearly playing from the wrong tee box and slowing things down to a halt (I am looking at you banana ball slicer who only gets a FIR hitting the fairway of another hole but continues to tee it up from the back boxes).

 

So now I most courses I find myself playing from a hybrid set of tee boxes throughout the round, mixing it up between the white boxes and blue boxes. If the hole is too short, I back up a set, but I am not too proud to enjoy the game like it is meant to be enjoyed. What about the rest of you out there. Do you think you honestly play the right set of tees most of the time, or are you playing from further back than you should be playing?

 

Also, earlier I said this post was mostly for the gentlemen as I have yet to encounter a group of ladies teeing up from too far away for their game. In my experience, it appears those that can play from further back know it and do, and others tee it forward where they are comfortable playing from. But would love everyone to weigh in and give their opinions.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My blitz group (seniors) goes by this format:

 

under 70 = white tees

70 - 75 = senior tees

75+ = forward tees

 

It's a fair system in my opinion and everyone seems to enjoy it.  I do think if a person has an ailment or injury, they should play as far forward as necessary to enjoy their game. 

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I change it up. Blue one week, White the next, then a mix, then a few forward tees. I usually only play one course, so I do this to "change the look" of the course.

 

But if I haven't played a course before I go for full dumb a$$ mode and play the blacks(tips) and generally shoot a poor score. Maybe I will write that down in my game plan book. (DONT PLAY FROM THE BACK, Jack!!)

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using MyGolfSpy

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I usually play the white tees. My league is from the whites, so I just play those most of the time. I would rather play from the blues.... I'm between clubs a lot less.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I'm by myself, I play from the tips. If I play with other person, I always just play whatever they feel comfortable with. I like the tips, I hit it pretty long and feel I get a better game with the length.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I generally do as dang3rtown does. If I'm out with my mom and/or gf, I'll play the forward tees. If I'm by myself I've dabbled from the tips, but usually I play from one set forward of the tips

 

Sent from my E6853 using MyGolfSpy mobile app

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to play the tips when I was younger and had a nice long drive. Now days, getting older, back surgery, two bad hips and 1 bad knee, so I play the whites (1 behind the senior tees). I should be playing the senior tee's for my distance but, can't bring myself to move up yet. Even though I should, I would feel guilty being I'm not 60 yet.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I went by my handicap and lack of length I should play the whites and I tend to score better and have more fun from those tees, the problem is I'm a member of a very active Men's Golf Association that has one to 2 events a month and a weekly 9 hole event during the summer months and their rules are if you are under 60 then you play the blues.

 

So I play the blues 99% of the time so I can practice from there.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I usually play the whites, it's a confidence thing if you can hammer it down the fairway and get on in 2 why not. The only thing better about the blues, I feel is I have a better full approach shot. I'm not good at backing off on shots.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using MyGolfSpy

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My weekly groups plays from the blues normally but once a month we alternate to the whites or back to the tips. Just trying to switch things up every now and then. We also play the day before Christmas Eve from the red tees.

 

Sent from my Pixel using MyGolfSpy mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I change it up. Blue one week, White the next, then a mix, then a few forward tees. I usually only play one course, so I do this to "change the look" of the course.

 

But if I haven't played a course before I go for full dumb a$$ mode and play the blacks(tips) and generally shoot a poor score. Maybe I will write that down in my game plan book. (DONT PLAY FROM THE BACK, Jack!!)

 

I don't understand Alan. 2 weeks ago in the course strategy thread you claimed to _never_ hit your 9-iron because you _always_ play your home course in the exact same fashion.

 

https://forum.mygolfspy.com/topic/19974-course-strategy/?p=298713

 

Genuinely not trying to poke and prod, but for better or worse I read every forum post from every member and have the memory of an elephant. So perhaps you could clarify for all of us... Which is it?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a tipper playing alone or when the group is game but will also happily follow majority rule.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My course is a little different.  Our Blue tees are everyone else's White tees, and the White tees are the senior tees.  I play from the Blues, but have played from the Whites.  The "rule" at my club is Age + Handicap = 90 or more; play from the Whites.  The way my game is going lately, I'll be playing from the Whites by the end of the year!!  BTW, my wife plays from either the Red tees or White tees.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like to play whichever tees will make the course the most fun for me. That doesn't mean I'm looking for easy scores, but I want to have a chance at going for some the Par 5's in two and I don't want all of the Par 3 to be

 

Some courses that means I'm playing from the back tees, but there are plenty more courses where I'm playing from the 2nd or 3rd furthest back - maybe even less on very select courses.

 

In my experience there aren't many courses in my immediate area that I can't play from the tips, but they simply aren't as much fun. I score around the same, but I have no chance at going for it in two on a par 5 and some of the par 3's can play like a short par 4. It's all about the enjoyment for me.

 

I've always told myself that if I start shooting

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ours go from red, blue, golden, white and black (tips)

 

Default tees here are red for ladies, blue seniors and golden for gentlemen. When playing for fun with friends, will do golden. When I play with lower handicappers or competitive rounds, then might go white. Never played black.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that I have a bad back I look for tees in the 5700-5900 range, I used to look for tees in the 6100-6200 range just 2 1/2 short years ago.  The combination of the bad back and I will turn 70 this year are taking a toll on my distance.  195-215 is pretty much my driving distance now. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The issue at my club is the blue tees are over 6700 yards and the whites are just under 6109... to me that's too big of a gap.

 

Just for fun I played the whites this afternoon....shot 81...longest club into a par 4 was a 7 iron, but most were 8 or 9....it's so much more fun to shoot a good score and to be able to go for the pin with a 9 iron in my hand instead just trying to hit the green somewhere with a 4 hybrid.

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should play the tee that you have the most fun on. Each tee should have its own slope rating so you handicap will adjust accordingly. I knew a guy that could drive the ball 300+ yards dead straight every time. He always played from the white tees tho and could barely break 95. I've seen him drive a par 4 and proceed to 4 putt for bogey. Heck of a guy the have on your scramble team though.

 

Long story short if people are giving you crap about which tee you are playing from maybe it's time to find a new group. It your money you spent, you should have the most fun you can.

 

Sent from my Pixel using MyGolfSpy mobile app

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like Chisag and others.... I choose my tee by the yardage. At my home course I play from the men's white tee. Our back tee is Blue. When I travel to another course I pick my tee from the card based on yardage. I played from the back tee at my home course for probably two years too long. When I finally moved up I too a lot of ribbing. But guess what has happened? Most of the guys have now moved up with me. Heh!

Sure there are still a few guys I play with and in my age group (62) that ought to give up the ghost and make the change but they haven't. Fine with me.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Announcements

  • Daily Deals

  • Sponsors

  • Our Sponsors

     
     
     

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      80,746
    • Most Online
      2,247

    Newest Member
    Rosco!!
    Joined
  • Similar Content

    • By Golfistathai
      Thailand is undoubtedly one of the best Golf Paradise in the World with more than 200 affordable golf courses throughout the country.
                Numbers of Thai golf courses designed by well-known golf legends such as Seve Ballesteros, Sir Nick Faldo and Arnold Palmer. just to name a few. This make Thailand one of the most visits destination for Golfers from all around the World every season, but on top of that, green fees here in Thailand are much cheaper than anywhere else. You can spend less than $25 to play in 18 holes in a standard golf course without any additional charge, how good is that!
                If you are planning to have a golf tour in Thailand in the upcoming vacation, Golfisthathai.com proudly present ‘Top 10 Best Cheap Golf Course in Thailand’ for your information and don’t forget to bring your golf bags next time you come to visit Thailand or you can shop your new clubs here, Thailand has many good and reliable used golf clubs store which we already have reviewed in ‘Top 5 Best Used Golf Club & Equipment in Thailand’
       
      1.Dragon Hills Golf and Country Club, Ratchaburi
       

      Green Fee:
                – Weekday: 440 Thai Baht ($14)
                – Weekend: 650 Thai Baht ($21)
      Golf Cart: 600 Thai Baht ($19)
      Detail: Par 72, Designed by Jim Engh, ranked in the Top 100 Best Golf Course in Thailand by top100golfcourses.com
      Location: 192, Tambon Ang Hin, Amphoe Pak Tho, Chang Wat Ratchaburi 70140
      Contact: +66 322 40504-5, +66 83 988 0775
      Website/Facebook: Dragon Hills Golf
      Comment: Scenic but challenging. High – handicap golfers should be aware.
       
      2.Kantarat Golf Course, Bangkok
       
      Green Fee:
                – Weekday: 400 Thai Baht ($13)
                – Weekend: 700 Thai Baht ($22)
      Golf Cart: 500 Thai Baht ($16)
      Detail: 18 Hole Par 72, Legendary and the 2nd Oldest Golf Course in Thailand. Kantarat has been known as the only Golf Course in the World surrounded by taxi lanes of Don Mueang International Airport.
      Location: 171 Kantarat Golf Club, The Royal Thai Air Force HQ, Vibhavadi Rangsit road. Don Mueang, Bangkok 10210
      Contact: (66) 2534-3842 , (66) 891177483
      Website/Facebook: Kantarat Golf Club
      Comment: Affordable and unique. You will never forget that once in your life you afraid to hit the airplane that’s going to take off with your driver!
       
      3.Hillside Country Home Golf & Resort, Prachin Buri
       

      Green Fee:
                – Weekday: 470 Thai Baht ($15)
                – Weekend: 700 Thai Baht ($22)
      Golf Cart: 500 Thai Baht ($16)
      Detail: 18 Hole Par 72 Designed by Akadej Bijaphala
      Location: 81/25 Moo 12, Nonsi, Kabin Buri District, Prachin Buri 25110
      Contact: +66 81 734 5915
      Website/Facebook: Hillside Country
      Comment: Peaceful with the beauty of nature and wildlife of Prachinburi. Drive away from busy Bangkok you find a gem hidden in the jungle at Hillside Country Club.
       
      4.Mountain Creek Golf Resort And Residences, Nakhon Ratchasima

       
      Green Fee:
                – Weekday: 590 Thai Baht ($19)
                – Weekend: 1,250 Thai Baht ($40)
      Golf Cart: 600 Thai Baht ($19)
      Detail: 27 Hole Par 72, one of the masterpieces of legendary Seve Ballesteros.
      Location: : 99/9 Moo 3 Mitrapab road, Lat Bua Khao Sub-district, Sikhio District, Nakhon Ratchasima Province
      Contact: 08 8885 3782, 08 5773 9773
      Website/Facebook: Mountain Creek
      Comment: One of the best-designed golf course in Thailand. Mountainous, tricky but scenic with the breathtaking view of Nakhon Ratchasima city, Lamtakong Dam and Khao Yai.
       
       
      5.Chom Bueng Hill Ratchaburi Country Club, Ratchaburi
       

      Green Fee:
                – Weekday: 270 Thai Baht ($8.75)
                – Weekend: 400 Thai Baht ($12.96)
      Golf Cart: 600 Thai Baht ($19)
      Detail: 6,900 Yards Par 72 formerly known as Woo Sung Castle Hill, with their unique and famously haunted building behind the 18th Hole.
      Location: 79 Moo 12 Tambol Jombung Amphur Jombung Ratchaburi 70150
      Contact: 032 -228-050-51
      Website/Facebook: Chom Bueng Hill
      Comment: About an hour drive from Bangkok, peaceful and fresh. The layout is a bit tricky but weekend golfers will love the birdie opportunities here.
       
      Continue Reading
         Top 10 Best Cheap Golf Course in Thailand - Golfistathai
      Golf Courses, play golf, Thai Golf courses, Golf courses in Thailand, best golf courses in Thailand, affordable golf courses, cheap golf courses, golf course deals, golf resort, 9 hole golf courses,
    • By GSwag
      https://www.geoffshackelford.com/homepage/2019/1/30/koepka-on-pace-of-play-guys-are-already-so-slow-its-kind-of-embarrassing
      Not only is Brooks right, but I think it's only a matter of time before someone finally gets DeChambeau to pick up the pace and knock off the intentionally gamesmanship that he displays against his playing partners, by intentionally waiting to start his conversation with his caddie about whatever it is they talk about, until after the other guys have finished hitting.  I mean, if you want to talk about air density and a thousand other things no one ever thinks about, fine, but all I think anyone is asking here is that you abide by the pace of play guidelines that the Tour has in place.  Eventually the Tour has to buckle to the pressure if enough outside influences keep this topic as alive and well as it has been for some time now.  I'm just surprised we have such a blatant horrible penalty on a non-issue with Haotong Li that gave him no advantage whatsoever, when pace of play actually does affect the other golfers on the course, not only in your group, but also behind you, as they wait on every shot because you are too busy crunching numbers on things no one besides you has a clue about or could care less about.
    • By GSwag
      Everyone complains about pace of play, and it's a seemingly never ending conversation.  And in all my years (40+) of playing golf, I have yet to have someone say to me, "I sure do like playing golf in 5 or 6 hours; the slower the better."
       
      Everyone I have ever talked to always says that they hate slow play.  Yet, once again, I found myself in the bowels of despair this weekend as I was playing in a "tournament" where both my Saturday and Sunday rounds were met with a 5 hour round, where we waited on the group in front of us on every hole and every shot.  In the defense of the group in front of us, they were waiting too, as was the group in front of them, etc, etc, etc.
       
      I emailed the tournament director about this, and as kindly as I could put it, simply said that I doubt that I would return to play with this group ever again, simply because of pace of play.
       
      I mean, pace of play is probably the most talked about subject in golf, and yet no one seems to ever be able to fix this "problem."
       
      Now, I realize that pace of play could be a subjective term as well.  Because if you give me a cart and an open course in front of me, I am done as a single in 90 minutes tops.  I grew up playing as a threesome with my Dad and my brother, and we'd finish 18 holes in 2 1/2 hours.
       
      But I'm not even suggesting those times as what anyone should realistically expect on a golf course.  But I know for a fact that the standard for pace of play on a fully loaded golf course at St. Andrews is 3:22.  See http://www.popeofslope.com/paceofplay/pace.html
       
      Is your normal round and expectation for a foresome for 18 holes about 4 hours and 30 minutes?  Is it 4 hours?
       
      I'll just end this by saying that I refuse to be the group in front of me's gallery for 18 holes.  If I have to wait on every shot, I'll quit the game first.
    • By cksurfdude
      OK -- there have been several threads / discussions on pace of play .. and some strong opinions on the matter .. and there have been many suggestions put forward on possible methods on how to handle pace of play issues. 
       
      But here, I'd like discuss the Tee It Forward idea.
       
      Personally I practice it myself, and it is not directly related to pace of play (although that dovetails in) but more about....
      * developing my game; 
      * having more confidence with my tee shot; 
      * working to hit more fairways.
       
      As one example of _not_ teeing it forward .. and I'm pretty sure you've all witnessed examples of this .. are the players who go all the way back to the tournament / championship tees and then either... 1. barely make it past the forward tees, or 2. lose most of their drives off the fairway.
       
      Yes, both those scenarios may have a negative impact on the pace of play for all groups behind, but -- HOW DOES THIS IMPACT HOW THESE PLAYERS ARE DEVELOPING THEIR GAME???
       
      What say you?
    • By Kenny B
      Last week on Tuesday and Wednesday I observed the Washington State Golf Association (WSGA) process for rating golf courses.  Why did I do this?  Well, I was curious why I could shoot certain scores on some courses, but not fair that well on other courses with similar ratings and slopes.  I'm still not sure about that, but at least I now know (sort of) the process used to come up with those ratings.  
       
      The team was led by the WSGA Director for Handicapping and Course Rating who is a WSGA employee.  The five other team members are volunteers that have gone through a training program to learn the process.  Each member has a USGA book that provides a number value for different features of the course for the scratch golfer and the 18-handicapper; for both men and women.  All the number values for the holes are crunched to come up with the values we see on the scorecards.  I didn't get into that, so how that works will be left up to those who want to volunteer and take the ratings course.  The team can either break up and rate alternate holes, or they can all stay on the same hole and rate the different teeing grounds.  We did the latter; maybe that was for my benefit so we could all be together.  
       
      The criteria for rating courses assumes a scratch male golfer hits a drive 250 yards and a second shot 220 yards, whereas the bogey golfer hits a drive 200 yards with a 170 yard second shot.  For the female scratch golfer, the drive is 210 yards with a 190 yard second shot, and the drive for the bogey female is 150 yards with a 130 yard second shot.
       
      These numbers are important because what we did on each hole is drive to the spot in the fairway where the scratch and bogey players would end up and measure fairway width, observe types of hazards and distance to them, and distance to OB is any.  If a bunker on the course was not within 20 yards of the landing area, it is not considered for that player.  From the tables in their book, a number is assigned for the scratch and bogey players.  Also considered are number and coverage of trees and the fairway stance difficulty.  Around the greens the team measures the green size, coverage of bunkers and bunker depth with women getting a more difficult value depending on depth.  Again, distances to hazards and OB is recorded and the tables in their book assign the number for both scratch and bogey.  Of course green speed is measured as is the depth of the fairway rough.  The team does these ratings in pairs, and after the hole has been evaluated, the pairs get together and compare numbers and if they don't agree, they resolve it immediately.  We did that a couple of times by going back to the spot on the course and re-evaluating the landing zone.
       
      The first course that we rated was Horn Rapids GC in Richland, WA.  This course is the only all desert course in the state.  There are houses  on part of the course with more being built every day, but they don't come into play except for the really bad shot.  The team is measuring the green on this short par 4 #1 with bunker in front and mounding left and long.  These houses are the closest of any on the course.
       

       
      Check out the sagebrush that comes into play on this par 5 #5.
       

       
      The desert also comes across the fairway off the tee that is reachable by the scratch golfers and very close for the bogey golfers.  For scratch it is considered a forced layup.  The USGA book has a section specific for deserts.
       
      From the tips this 220 yard par 3 #8 plays downhill.  The team also measures elevation change which also translates into a number from USGA table.
       

       
      The short par 4 #9 is difficult because the water is right next to the green on the left with a drop off on the right about 10 feet to a bunker. That tree comes into play if your are on the left side of the fairway.
       

       
      This course is hilly and quite long between greens to the next tee box, and while walkable, carts are recommended.  Rating this course took all day, but after the data was gathered, some of the team members played the course; one of the perks of being on the committee.
       
      On day 2 the team went to the West Richland GC in West Richland, WA.  This was my very first course that I played in town, and where I  learned to play.  My teacher is still the pro there.  We played the course this last Sunday and with a sore rib muscle, I still managed to shoot 78.  It's an easy, flat course in a flood plain, and it floods most every year.  The Yakima River borders the right side of the course which is the back nine and a canal runs through the middle of #1, #9, #10, #11, and #12.  Since it floods, maintenance is difficult and as such the course is usually pretty rough.  
       
      This is a picture this winter looking out at the #18 fairway from the clubhouse.  The canal is actually above water, about 150 yards from the green.
       

       
      The water is all gone, but the grass has not fully recovered in some spots on the course.  Here is the team on the short par 4 #10 green.
       

       
      Standing on the 190 yard #11 tee box looking through the grass bordering the canal.  The river is left of the green.
       

       
      After going through the process, I understand what they are looking for to determine difficulty of a course, but that doesn't mean that I necessarily agree with the ratings and slope they come up with.  It's not a perfect model, but I think it is at least consistent in the application.  The Director said that the USGA course rating system will undergo some changes in 2018 in an effort for the all rating systems worldwide to conform to one process.  THAT ought to be interesting.
       
      To sum up my experience, I now appreciate what the rating committee goes through to rate our courses.  The Director has personally rated every course in Washington State, some many times.  But it would not be possible without the help of non-paid volunteers.  One of the volunteers was local, but the others all came from the Seattle area which is over 200 miles away.  It's a constant process given how many courses there are in the state.  Most volunteers are retired, which is how they are able to contribute as much as they do.  Do I want to do this?  Ahhh, NO!  
       
       
  • Recent Topics

  • Latest from the Blog

  • Happy Birthday Today!

×
×
  • Create New...