Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Not sure if anyone else has heard this yet or not, but I have been told that the new 720 irons (or whatever Titleist decides to call them) is set to release this August (2019). If so, I would totally expect to start seeing the announcements right before either the Masters or the recently moved PGA Championship. Anyone else have more info??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No more info. But Titleist usually uses a mid summer event to seed the new releases. So I definitely doubt the Masters and even the PGA.  More likely US Open or perhaps Travelers.   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be interesting if they stay true to their typical product line... Or if they step in a different direction. But I would think they play it safe

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Golfspy_CG2 said:

No more info. But Titleist usually uses a mid summer event to seed the new releases. So I definitely doubt the Masters and even the PGA.  More likely US Open or perhaps Travelers.   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

With no tiger event which has been the usual event I think they use the us open again like last year for the ts line

im guessing we see new drivers this year to compliment the ts2/3 (will bring a bunch of hate from those who hate titleist) 

also think we see something new in the ap line 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing Titleist is really missing from their line up is a game improvement or super game improvement set of irons but with their success and notoriety in the world of quality irons I don’t think that’s something they will or should try to add.

In my opinion the players in this category of golf won’t benefit from the name on a club so whether it is Titleist or Top Flight I’m not sure it really matters.


Sent from my iPhone using MyGolfSpy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jturner7499 said:

The only thing Titleist is really missing from their line up is a game improvement or super game improvement set of irons but with their success and notoriety in the world of quality irons I don’t think that’s something they will or should try to add.

In my opinion the players in this category of golf won’t benefit from the name on a club so whether it is Titleist or Top Flight I’m not sure it really matters.


Sent from my iPhone using MyGolfSpy

Ap1s are definitely in the game improvement category 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll be surprised if we really see much change in the lineup. Titleist has a clear and consistent formula for their clubs and it's worked much better for the irons than it did for the drivers which explains the decision for TS. If anything, I think they might try to spice up the AP1 a little to fall in line with their new "speed"/distance campaign. I also think it's possible the hybrids might carry the TS moniker to better match the drivers and fairways even though hybrids are an iron replacement club.

There really isn't much missing from the Titleist lineup, but there are a lot of misconceptions about their product so the biggest change we're likely to see is in their marketing. Every model in their current iron lineup - except for the MB - features tungsten and a thinned out face to produce better ball speeds. Yes, even the CB (2-7 iron).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet we see a:

 

AP1 720

AP2 720

AP3 720

TMB 720

CB 720

MB 720

 

... been pretty much like that for ever now. Unless they jump on the “speed wagon” and add a random set in or rename the TMB’s.

 

Same stuff with a facelift I’d imagine.

 

I wish they’d make the CB’s and MB’s without the “Forged” and “CB/MB” just say Titleist. Everyone knows what they are.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, TR1PTIK said:

I'll be surprised if we really see much change in the lineup. Titleist has a clear and consistent formula for their clubs and it's worked much better for the irons than it did for the drivers which explains the decision for TS. If anything, I think they might try to spice up the AP1 a little to fall in line with their new "speed"/distance campaign. I also think it's possible the hybrids might carry the TS moniker to better match the drivers and fairways even though hybrids are an iron replacement club.

There really isn't much missing from the Titleist lineup, but there are a lot of misconceptions about their product so the biggest change we're likely to see is in their marketing. Every model in their current iron lineup - except for the MB - features tungsten and a thinned out face to produce better ball speeds. Yes, even the CB (2-7 iron).

I doubt the hybrid carry the ts name unless they decide to change their approach from the hybrids being about iron replacements and not distance clubs. The reason they changed from releasing hybrids with drivers and woods to releasing with the irons is to change the mindset that hybrids go better with irons since they are used to replace an iron.

i think titleist is going to surprise people this coming release. Some of the brand enthusiasts will like it and some won’t. Those who aren’t a fan of the brand will knock it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RickyBobby_PR said:

I doubt the hybrid carry the ts name unless they decide to change their approach from the hybrids being about iron replacements and not distance clubs. The reason they changed from releasing hybrids with drivers and woods to releasing with the irons is to change the mindset that hybrids go better with irons since they are used to replace an iron.

i think titleist is going to surprise people this coming release. Some of the brand enthusiasts will like it and some won’t. Those who aren’t a fan of the brand will knock it.

I understand why they changed their approach to hybrids, but hybrids still stand apart from the irons in name - 818 for the hybrids vs. 718 for the irons. Throw in the fact, that Titleist has now thrown their hat into the distance game, and I think we may see a slight change in the way the hybrids are advertised - while still keeping them on the iron release cycle. After all, hybrids typically replace long irons because they offer forgiveness AND distance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, TR1PTIK said:

I understand why they changed their approach to hybrids, but hybrids still stand apart from the irons in name - 818 for the hybrids vs. 718 for the irons. Throw in the fact, that Titleist has now thrown their hat into the distance game, and I think we may see a slight change in the way the hybrids are advertised - while still keeping them on the iron release cycle. After all, hybrids typically replace long irons because they offer forgiveness AND distance.

It makes sense that the hybrids would have a different first number than irons. They areca separate category just like they are different from the driver/woods. They wanted that separation from the woods numbering they used to use.

while titleist “jumped into the distance” game with the TS line it’s because they felt they needed an of the shelf driver that could compete in the store launch monitors. But that doesn’t mean they are going to switch to the distance approach with hybrids seeing they approach them as iron replacements do going TS in the naming contradicts the approach. 

I wouldn’t be surprised if they went back to the 9xx system in the next release now that they’ve told the speed story with ts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, RickyBobby_PR said:

It makes sense that the hybrids would have a different first number than irons. They areca separate category just like they are different from the driver/woods. They wanted that separation from the woods numbering they used to use.

while titleist “jumped into the distance” game with the TS line it’s because they felt they needed an of the shelf driver that could compete in the store launch monitors. But that doesn’t mean they are going to switch to the distance approach with hybrids seeing they approach them as iron replacements do going TS in the naming contradicts the approach. 

I wouldn’t be surprised if they went back to the 9xx system in the next release now that they’ve told the speed story with ts.

Fair enough. I think at the end of the day Titleist may surprise us all regardless. Despite what their "tour count" would have us believe, it's clear they've lost some ground to competitors and are trying to make that up. While I don't think that it will create a drastic change in how they engineer and develop products, I do think it will (and has) change the way they market their products - perhaps not wholesale change, but enough to notice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TR1PTIK said:

Fair enough. I think at the end of the day Titleist may surprise us all regardless. Despite what their "tour count" would have us believe, it's clear they've lost some ground to competitors and are trying to make that up. While I don't think that it will create a drastic change in how they engineer and develop products, I do think it will (and has) change the way they market their products - perhaps not wholesale change, but enough to notice.

I don’t think they necessarily lost ground but rather (especially in driver category) understand the consumer perception and results that off the shelf their previous models lacked speed compared to Callaway and TM. While they still push the get fit aspect and titleist Thursday’s they understand a lot of amateurs are going into box stores and hitting a few drivers in stock setup and they need to impress them with numbers on the monitor.

titleist has already been changing slowly with the addition of ap3 (I think this is where we will see some changes in the next release) and also the yellow in pro v1/x as well as the avx release last year both in color and as another tour level ball offering.

i do think they will stay true to their overall approach while as you said change their marketing 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, RickyBobby_PR said:

I don’t think they necessarily lost ground but rather (especially in driver category) understand the consumer perception and results that off the shelf their previous models lacked speed compared to Callaway and TM. While they still push the get fit aspect and titleist Thursday’s they understand a lot of amateurs are going into box stores and hitting a few drivers in stock setup and they need to impress them with numbers on the monitor.

titleist has already been changing slowly with the addition of ap3 (I think this is where we will see some changes in the next release) and also the yellow in pro v1/x as well as the avx release last year both in color and as another tour level ball offering.

i do think they will stay true to their overall approach while as you said change their marketing 

People have been steering away from Titleist for years now due to perceptions about the brand, the type of golfer their clubs are designed for, and high priced golf balls. Their drivers have been noted as "spinny" and short by comparison for a long time by many golfers and a lot of people are reluctant to try their irons out of some weird belief that they aren't "good enough" because Titleist is largely seen as a "better players" brand. All the changes they've been making of late are largely due to market reactions. They're trying to regain what's been lost. It doesn't mean they don't lead one or more categories in market share (golf balls for instance), but they have seen reductions (lost ground) - however small - due to competitor advances.

None of this is in any way a knock on Titleist. I love their products and have played a number of their golf clubs and balls and will continue to do so in the future, but facts are facts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like Titleist will be seeding their new hybrids and utility irons at the Memorial. As predicted, hybrids will carry the TS moniker to maintain consistency (in name only) with the drivers and fairway woods. What I didn't see coming was a departure in how the utility irons are marketed. There's still time for them to change if desired, but currently the utility irons have been placed in their own category on the Titleist website and no information has been given yet as to whether or not they will carry the 700 series naming scheme utilized by current model irons.

I'm curious to see if the separation of the utility irons means we will see the T-MB go away. I've yet to see or hear of many golfers bagging a full set of T-MB. However, Titleist appears to be offering two choices of utility iron (probably a mid or high trajectory and a low trajectory model - similar to Taylormade's GAPR) so it's possible that they are engineered to perform quite differently from T-MB.

I'll certainly be interested to see how this all plays out.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TR1PTIK said:

Looks like Titleist will be seeding their new hybrids and utility irons at the Memorial. As predicted, hybrids will carry the TS moniker to maintain consistency (in name only) with the drivers and fairway woods. What I didn't see coming was a departure in how the utility irons are marketed. There's still time for them to change if desired, but currently the utility irons have been placed in their own category on the Titleist website and no information has been given yet as to whether or not they will carry the 700 series naming scheme utilized by current model irons.

I'm curious to see if the separation of the utility irons means we will see the T-MB go away. I've yet to see or hear of many golfers bagging a full set of T-MB. However, Titleist appears to be offering two choices of utility iron (probably a mid or high trajectory and a low trajectory model - similar to Taylormade's GAPR) so it's possible that they are engineered to perform quite differently from T-MB.

I'll certainly be interested to see how this all plays out.

There are some design characteristics of the ts woods carried over to the hybrids with the removal of the speed channel and assumption is they are using the same lightweight materials and fast face.

the utility/driving iron is using a 500’series (u500 and 510).  They are offering 1,2,3 in the 510 an 2,3,4 in the 500.

with the tmb being a full iron lineup and not a real utility iron I can see them keeping that line in the next release. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, RickyBobby_PR said:

There are some design characteristics of the ts woods carried over to the hybrids with the removal of the speed channel and assumption is they are using the same lightweight materials and fast face.

the utility/driving iron is using a 500’series (u500 and 510).  They are offering 1,2,3 in the 510 an 2,3,4 in the 500.

with the tmb being a full iron lineup and not a real utility iron I can see them keeping that line in the next release. 

Nothing that I've seen released indicates they've done much to change the hybrids aside from looks and name with the exception that now only one model features adjustable CG instead of both models like 818. It's likely the hybrids maintain a similar construction to previous models as Titleist hybrids have rarely (if ever) been marketed as a distance club. 

 

The T-MB was essentially birthed as a utility iron and then offered later as a complete set. Now that AP3 exists, there isn't much need for T-MB except to compete directly with other hollow-body designed sets.

Personally, the Titleist lineup is starting to look a bit busy (for them) and I don't see many people playing T-MB as anything other than a driving iron. Seems like an easy decision to drop the model from their lineup and push AP3 further.

The only other logical reason to keep T-MB is because investors want Titleist to maintain a more diverse portfolio of products.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, TR1PTIK said:

Nothing that I've seen released indicates they've done much to change the hybrids aside from looks and name with the exception that now only one model features adjustable CG instead of both models like 818. It's likely the hybrids maintain a similar construction to previous models as Titleist hybrids have rarely (if ever) been marketed as a distance club. 

 

The T-MB was essentially birthed as a utility iron and then offered later as a complete set. Now that AP3 exists, there isn't much need for T-MB except to compete directly with other hollow-body designed sets.

Personally, the Titleist lineup is starting to look a bit busy (for them) and I don't see many people playing T-MB as anything other than a driving iron. Seems like an easy decision to drop the model from their lineup and push AP3 further.

The only other logical reason to keep T-MB is because investors want Titleist to maintain a more diverse portfolio of products.

I'm with you on this! Titleist used to have one of the cleanest lineups, and yes the last couple years it has gotten a little more packed, and slightly more overlapped 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TR1PTIK said:

Nothing that I've seen released indicates they've done much to change the hybrids aside from looks and name with the exception that now only one model features adjustable CG instead of both models like 818. It's likely the hybrids maintain a similar construction to previous models as Titleist hybrids have rarely (if ever) been marketed as a distance club. 

 

The T-MB was essentially birthed as a utility iron and then offered later as a complete set. Now that AP3 exists, there isn't much need for T-MB except to compete directly with other hollow-body designed sets.

Personally, the Titleist lineup is starting to look a bit busy (for them) and I don't see many people playing T-MB as anything other than a driving iron. Seems like an easy decision to drop the model from their lineup and push AP3 further.

The only other logical reason to keep T-MB is because investors want Titleist to maintain a more diverse portfolio of products.

Prior to the 816 release the titleist hybrids were considered distance clubs and not iron replacements which they changed with the 816 lineup because they felt it better to make them play more like an iron replacement than a distance club.  If you look at the 818 you will see they have the active recoil channel labeled on the bottom. Titleist did away with that in the ya woods and the pics of the ts hybrids don’t have that.

while the tmb was somewhat released as a utility iron it was more designed as a MOTO club and from the 5i down and was given the option to purchase a full somewhat limited high end set while not being fully limited edition like the concept 16 irons and woods. 2018 was designed as a full set.

Guess they can’t in some people’s eyes no matter what they do. First they get labeled as being a better players club so they release the 710 ap1 and 2 along with the cb and mb to give more options. Then the offer the 718 ap3 to meet demand for the looks of the ap2 with more forgiveness and without the chunkiness of the ap1. Now they go back to a utility iron to offer more choices for those who want a long iron and not a hybrid but don’t want to use a club from the ap1 or 3 set and are said to look to busy.  

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, RickyBobby_PR said:

Prior to the 816 release the titleist hybrids were considered distance clubs and not iron replacements which they changed with the 816 lineup because they felt it better to make them play more like an iron replacement than a distance club.  If you look at the 818 you will see they have the active recoil channel labeled on the bottom. Titleist did away with that in the ya woods and the pics of the ts hybrids don’t have that.

while the tmb was somewhat released as a utility iron it was more designed as a MOTO club and from the 5i down and was given the option to purchase a full somewhat limited high end set while not being fully limited edition like the concept 16 irons and woods. 2018 was designed as a full set.

Guess they can’t in some people’s eyes no matter what they do. First they get labeled as being a better players club so they release the 710 ap1 and 2 along with the cb and mb to give more options. Then the offer the 718 ap3 to meet demand for the looks of the ap2 with more forgiveness and without the chunkiness of the ap1. Now they go back to a utility iron to offer more choices for those who want a long iron and not a hybrid but don’t want to use a club from the ap1 or 3 set and are said to look to busy.  

 

 

Every OEM since pretty much always have classified hybrids as long-iron replacements. Where Titleist departed from the norm is by reaching the conclusion that a hybrid is essentially a scoring club and began launching it alongside their irons which they had not done previously.

T-MB was initially billed as a utility iron - it is literally in the product description on Titleist's website.

I never said or otherwise indicated that Titleist is doing anything wrong, but merely speculated that this puts T-MB in an awkward position as AP3 serves the same purpose of being a players distance iron therefore rendering the need for a T-MB set somewhat useless. The introduction of new utility irons not carrying the T-MB name further reduces the need for T-MB and so I think ultimately, it just doesn't have a good place in the lineup anymore. This is not an uncommon problem to have when developing new products and trying to re-position your brand within the marketplace which is precisely what Titleist has been doing since the release of TS, AVX, and Tour Soft.

Your assertions about my opinion of Titleist and the clubs they produce is clearly misguided and shows a clear lack of reading comprehension. I appreciate your passion for a brand that you obviously put a lot of trust in (and money behind), but your fanboy is showing... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Announcements

  • Daily Deals

  • Sponsors

  • Our Sponsors

     
     
     

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      82,216
    • Most Online
      2,247

    Newest Member
    Pistonuk
    Joined
  • Similar Content

    • By Will_the_thrill
      Brand new
      35” Scotty Cameron Phantom X6
      won from a member/guest 
      open to trades but prefer $
       
      $350 obo, will ship to anywhere in US







    • By Golfspy_CG2
      So today culminated my couple day visit to Carlsbad, and what a way to wrap it up.  I spent over 1/2 the day at TPI getting fit then meeting with some of the Titleist brand people.
      It was simply the best fitting experience I've ever had, and some of you know I've had some pretty darn good ones before.  But from the expanse of the facility, over 30 acres of hitting areas from a 400 yard hole with actual fairway bunkers and lining it to replicate the actual teeing off on a hole, to multiple putting greens, a couple short game areas, it was incredible to take in.  That's not even mentioning the full fledged fitness center inside where the performance evaluation is done. 
      I was met at the entry by Joey, who knew my name and welcomed me and showed me to the locker room, where a locker with my name awaited.  After dropping a few things off in the locker we made our way through the tour.   In addition to the above, i was able to watch a bit of some ball testing that was going  on...and guess what they were using a robot just like the MGS Study did.   I can't say much about that testing but it was pretty cool to see the high arching perfectly struck 5 irons going 200 yards down range right at the target.    Needless to say, I didn't see any more of those type  shots during the day. 
      After I got warmed up by hitting some shots with my clubs we began getting some trackman numbers.  I had my usual pedestrian numbers that were as follows
      IRONS
      My current Irons   G700 with Alta CB Sr Flx  1/2 over and 3 degrees up.
      SS 73.6 ball speed 94 mph for a 1.29 smash 😞  Spin was low at 4182 carry of 134 peak height of 68 and landing angle of 43.  As has been discussed in some threads here, we amateurs often say we hit the ball too high or at the very least, high enough.  Then when at times we will see numbers like that 68 feet and realize we aren't hitting it high enough.
      We started with the T300 and also tried the CNCPT 01.  There wasn't a huge number difference in the number between the two and my contact with the T300 was much more consistent as the CNCPT has an even wider sole than the T300 and that works against me. 
      The overall numbers for the T300 were
      SS 71.3 ball speed 95.1 for a smash factor of 1.33.  Spin was up to 5790 carry of 136 height was 72 and landing angle of 44.5.   So not a huge difference except for one area, the smash factor.    If you noticed my swing speed dropped but ball  speed went up a bit due to the better contact.  
      There was a reason for the decreased ball speed.   The specs of the T300 are standard length and standard lie.  The 1/2 over was causing too inconsistent of a strike and i hit some shots fat, leaving them 10 or more yards short.   With the stock length I was hitting it much more flush.   The 2 degrees upright was causing the heel to hit the turf first on some shots, causing the face to shut down and result in a smothered pull hook.   I had wondered where that shot came from on occasions..ha  Glen feels as I get more confident with the T300 I might regain that 1mph or so in club speed, he sensed I was trying to be too precise in my strike with the T300.   He was probably right.
      Going  with a stock lie, again allowed for much cleaner and more consistent contact. We even flirted with a 1/2 inch SHORT shaft and 1 degree Flat.  But the shaft felt a bit heavy--unbeknownst to me he had put a heavier shaft in to account for the shorter length, and there was a bit too much fade for both of our liking,  So I'm now stock/stock/stock...Yee haw, that make buying selling much easier...LOL
      DRIVER 
      Current Driver TS1 10.5 Fubuki 45g Sr. Flex.
      Most know I've loved this driver since getting it in June.   I'll save all the details, It's the right driver for me, but I did better with a 9.5 loft and changed the setting from A3 to  B3, which is a bit more closed.   My spin in the original setup was in the mid 4500's.  and too much fade.   The changes lowered the spin to 2700 and was a straight to very slight cut shot.   I picked up 8 yards of carry and 17 yards total.   Here's the part that blew me away.   Glen said to me, "You just bought a driver this summer, I don't want to  tell you to turn around and buy another new one.   If you will  leave this driver with me, I'll  find a home for it, and send you a new 9.5 out with the same shaft."   He looked to see if he had a new 9.5 on hand and he didn't only the fitting ones.    How awesome is that.
      Fairway Wood  & Hybrids
      Current Setup G410 3,7 and 9 and 5 hybrid.
      Again anyone who followed my posts or progress in the PING Long Game Testing, knows how much these have helped my game this year and how confident I am in them.
      Well to make this section short and sweet, after gathering numbers from my 7 and 9 woods, Glen had me hit a Titleist 7 wood just for  Sh$%^and Giggles, as I was getting 1.49 smash factor consistently with the 7w and my ball speed had stayed within 1.5 mph on each shot, the perfect consistency he said.   So after hitting a few good shots with the TS2 7W that had pretty much identical  numbers, he  told me the only reason for me to get that would be if I wanted a Titleist, but said my current set up was as good as I could  get.   How's that for honesty, no  trying  to  spin the numbers or tweak anything to show the Titliest is better.  He just commented that I am a very good  FW player and what currently have works for me. 
      WEDGES 
      Current SM7 54 and 58, and PING Glide 50
      This one was fun and interesting.  He had determined my  pitching wedge distance was probably right at 100 to 105 yards based on my iron data.   So we went to a different teeing area across the complex and set up on a tee box 100 yards from a flag on the front  part of a green.   I hit 3 very solid  shots with my set PW and  he was impressed.   He gave me the PW to the T300 and I hit two pin high within 5 to 10 feet and pulled the third one a bit.   He said enough there. ha
      Then we moved up about 15 yards to 85 and he gave me the GW and more of the same.  I was feeling  it with these wedges.   
      Then this part was interesting.  He gave me a ball told to walk up to a spot short of the green and drop the ball at a distance I  get a lot of.   I waked to  a shot I eyed balled that I have a lot and dropped the ball.   He asked what club I would hit with this shot, I said the 54 and he gave it to me, lasered it at 45 yards.  He asked how  I  would play it, I said probably fly it 3/4 of the way and let it hit stop and release the last few yards.  
      I hit the first two practically perfect but  then I hit 3 in a row fat...egads!!   He said, ok we can fix that. 
      Then he asked me other than bunker or flop shots over  a bunker what do  I use the 58 for.   I told him when I'm about 10 yards off the green and there is a front pin about 5 yards or so.   So I like to hit a little 15 or 20 yard hit and stop shot.   He  said, OK I want to  see that.  
      When I hit the first two exactly as I  described to  2 feet.  He turned  to Josh and Corey who were watching and said..."Looks whose teaching the short game clinic"   
      So the only change we made with the  wedges is he felt  my 54 with the M grind and 8 degrees bounce wasn''t  forgiving enough.   He said to quote Bob Vokey's favorite saying..."Bounce is our friend"   He said we need to go  F grind and 12 degrees bounce.   I hit that from the 40 yard shot and it felt much better and I didn't have  any fat shots. 
      So that concluded it.  And I was pretty spent after hitting shots for going on 3 hours.   But the time literally flew.  We chatted a bit, then Josh and Corey took me out to what they said was a well earned lunch
      Best Day Ever!
      Here's a bunch of random shots.   One thing that I failed at and anyone who has done a fitting can probably relate, and that was getting photos during the fitting. I got so  wrapped up in hitting the  shots then listening to  Glen dissect them, I just didn't think about it. 
       
      Don't know who the other two are, but that's ok, they probably had no  idea who I was 🙂

      One of the fairways getting some early morning acquaintance 
      An indoor hitting bay that hits out to the fairways, only used on the rare days the weather doesn't permit. 
      A recently over-seeded fairway,  they will  alternate fairways to keep them all pristine. 
      This is where they will do the 4D motion capture as part of the Performance Evaluation Fitting, 27 high speed cameras capture everything you do and the ball does 
      These are some members of the player testing panel.  Much like our Most Wanted Testing, local area guys who  have signed up to come in and test new and prototype equipment and balls to give them real world  feedback.   So when MGS tells the doubters that they use real golfers for club tests as do most of the OEM's they meant  what they say. 
      The nicest boardroom I've ever seen.  How  does anyone concentrate on the meeting in a room like this...ha
      The most pristine putting and practice bunker green I've ever  seen. 
      The area where my fitting will be done   
      My first target...easy eough 🙂
      This is taken from a balcony on top of the clubhouse area where they will  entertain or just generally hang out and realize it doesn't get much better than this. 

      My new best friend...Josh Talge VP of Marketing for Clubs
      Glen Mahler...the man is a legend at Titleist


      The obligatory Ocean View Selfie!!
    • By bzielinski
      Recently purchased some 5A Titleist balls on Ebay.
      Ordered 48 yellow AVX, every ball looked like they were fresh from package, no player marks, not even the slightest nick or scuff. Every Ball had the same number. When i questioned the vendor he said if I was nervous I could return the balls. Wwhich I did .
      Bought some of the new Yellow Prov 1X from another vendor. Again every ball looked just like brand new, No player marks or any evidence that had ever  been hit.
      Cut one open and tweeted image it to #finditcutit and also to @titleist.
      Both vendors claim THEY do not repaint or rebrand either of these orders. It is my suspicion that they are buying new yellow unbranded balls and having the Titleist logo and info applied. Both vendors have over 1000 positive feedback.
      I have emailed Titleist with the vendor info for them to investigate.
      Bud
       
       
       
       
       
       

    • By Golfspy_CG2
      So my two favorite golf destinations are Whistling Straits and Pinehurst.   I've been lucky enough to visit both multiple times.   I was doubly lucky that one of the trips to Pinehurst in 2016 was as part of the Team Titleist event, which I chronicled here, right after I joined the site.
      Well I'll complete the TeamTitleist DoubePlay....if you will,  this week.  On Wednesday I'll be headed to Kohler to spend three days and nights with some great TeamTitleist members that I have met over the years at the events, and several members of Titleist staff.   They are litteraly among the best people in the industry that I've met and put on a great event for the attendees. 

       
      Highlights this year will include:
      Playing Blackwolf Run--Home of a couple of Women's US Opens Playing WS Straits course, site of the 202 Ryder Cup and has hosted the PGA Championship three times!  An afternoon demo/fitting session of the entire Titleist line, including the new T Series irons and TS FW's and Hybrids Titleist Ball Fitting and Demo A hands on instructional clinic from Cameron McCormick Based on previous events..A huge bag full of Titleist and Team Titleist swag And best of all three days of meals and great memories with other passionate golfers!  And probably unfortunately spending more money than I need to in the pro shop on 2020 Ryder Cup merchandise 🙄 I'll be filling this thread as much as I can with pictures throughout the three days starting tomorrow.  
    • By Golfspy_CG2
      Press Release from Titleist
      Tour-Proven Design Sets Tone for 2020 Jet Black Collection
        FAIRHAVEN, Mass. (Aug. 13, 2019) – The introduction of the new Titleist Tour Bag – making its debut for the FedExCup Playoffs – signals a distinct and modern upgrade on the fairways of the PGA Tour and professional tours around the world.
          Styled and designed based on feedback from tour players and their caddies, in addition to input from PGA golf professionals, the new Tour Bag offers a glimpse into Titleist’s forthcoming 2020 Jet Black Collection that will feature products ranging from stand bags and cart bags to leather headcovers and umbrellas.
        Representing a perfect blend of performance elements and refined detail, the key features of the Jet Black Collection are inspired by the new Tour Bag and incorporated into the entire line – including velour top cuff materials, premium ball pocket panels and luxurious quilted hip pads – reimagined in the Titleist brand colors of black, red, and white.
        “I’m absolutely pumped for the new tour bag,” said Justin Thomas. “We’ve been asking for a fresh, new look and the designers came through big. I love the blacked-out design with the red zippers – and that white Titleist script just pops. You can tell they’ve taken our feedback and thought about every little detail. It’s really slick.”     Thomas is one of more than 150 players that have used a Titleist Tour Bag this year on the PGA Tour, with more Titleist Tour Bags in play each week than any other brand.
             
       
      NEW TITLEIST TOUR BAG FEATURES
      • Hero product of the Jet Black Collection
      • Tour proven 3-point single shoulder strap
      • Durable materials and quilted highlights
      • Premium metal hardware
      • 5 Way top cuff with integrated handles
      • Magnetic, velour lined valuables pocket
      • New Interior organization in apparel pockets
        AVAILABILITY
      The Titleist Tour Bag ($550) is available in golf shops worldwide beginning Sept. 1, with the complete Jet Black Collection coming in early 2020.
        ON THE WEB
      https://www.titleist.com/golf-gear/golf-bags
       
       

  • Recent Topics

  • Latest from the Blog

  • Happy Birthday Today!

×
×
  • Create New...