Jump to content
Reid Thompson

Maltby MMB 17s, TE Forged, TS-1s or some cool Maltby I don't even know about

Recommended Posts

Considering MMB 17, TE Forged and TS-1s. I hit the ball too low and have an out to in bias that produces toe hits often. I am a 2 but have no ego. I do like less graphics on clubs however and that knocked out TS-2s. I don't love the looks of the TE forged and that will lose in a tie breaker. I want the highest flying, easy to hit club out of the 3 (Seem very close in MPF, could it be for MMBs?? ). Coming from JPX 850 Forged which are surprisingly low on MPF.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Reid Thompson said:

Considering MMB 17, TE Forged and TS-1s. I hit the ball too low and have an out to in bias that produces toe hits often. I am a 2 but have no ego. I do like less graphics on clubs however and that knocked out TS-2s. I don't love the looks of the TE forged and that will lose in a tie breaker. I want the highest flying, easy to hit club out of the 3 (Seem very close in MPF, could it be for MMBs?? ). Coming from JPX 850 Forged which are surprisingly low on MPF.

If you are blindly buying clubs based on the MPF, then you are doing it wrong.

If you want Maltby irons, that's fine - the the MPF really has no weight outside of Maltby trying to push their own products.

 

850 forged were a great club.  If you are looking for something even more forgiving and higher launching that still looks good, check out the TMade P790, MIzuno 919 Hot Metal or Hot Metal Pros, Srixon 585s, etc.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jlukes, fellow reformed NJ guy here, thanks for the response.  Grew up on the Union County tracks and mostly Ashbrook.  I have always loved Mizuno but just like the potential science that has gone into MPF it and seems like they have been very well received.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don’t rule out @GolfSub70 or Lynx irons.  The Prowler VT irons some of us reviewed recently are beautiful in the bag and at address. With the kbs tour 90 shaft, they launched high and landed softly. The shaft wasn’t a good fit for me which has me debating a reshaft or going with the sub70 699’s.  

One thing that sub70 has going for them is you can get a couple demo clubs to try out and everybody raves about their customer service. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of people trash the MPF but the measurements give a lot of merit to a club head that has the COG in the middle of the club face as well as a lower VCOG. Designs that do not will not score well. But find a sweet spot on any iron and repeatedly hitting it will give you great results.

Of the three irons you looked at with Maltby the TE will be the highest flying of the three. It has an extremely low VCOG. They also have that sweet buttery feel to them. The flight of the next two are pretty darn close and I might give the nod to the TS-1 as being higher. The MMB-17 has the look of a classic blade but with it's nearly hollowed out back of the iron it plays like a cavity back.
The TS-1 with its hollow core design and urethane filling is the latest and greatest trend. It's looks are what I believe is the best of the three.
The TE and the MMB have been around for a long time and each year still sell well. They are timeless designs that have evolved every few years, but just slightly. If you want to keep up with the Jones the TS-1 is the way to go. The TS-1 also has this 4 way chambered sole that just refuses to dig into the ground. If the MMBs had this sole they would never leave my bag.
Tough to go wrong with any of those three. Plus the money laid out is about a 1/3 less than any equal OEM. I would also try and spec yourself out a high flying shaft as well.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Popeye64 said:

A lot of people trash the MPF but the measurements give a lot of merit to a club head that has the COG in the middle of the club face as well as a lower VCOG. Designs that do not will not score well. But find a sweet spot on any iron and repeatedly hitting it will give you great results.

Of the three irons you looked at with Maltby the TE will be the highest flying of the three. It has an extremely low VCOG. They also have that sweet buttery feel to them. The flight of the next two are pretty darn close and I might give the nod to the TS-1 as being higher. The MMB-17 has the look of a classic blade but with it's nearly hollowed out back of the iron it plays like a cavity back.
The TS-1 with its hollow core design and urethane filling is the latest and greatest trend. It's looks are what I believe is the best of the three.
The TE and the MMB have been around for a long time and each year still sell well. They are timeless designs that have evolved every few years, but just slightly. If you want to keep up with the Jones the TS-1 is the way to go. The TS-1 also has this 4 way chambered sole that just refuses to dig into the ground. If the MMBs had this sole they would never leave my bag.
Tough to go wrong with any of those three. Plus the money laid out is about a 1/3 less than any equal OEM. I would also try and spec yourself out a high flying shaft as well.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

The sole comment is huge.   I'm a delofting digger so that is a big part of it.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The sole comment is huge.   I'm a delofting digger so that is a big part of it.  
The sole design is as good as anything designed today. It's like the Srixon soles if you have ever hit those in turf.
The sole of the MMB is true blade like and can leave some monster divots of you really dig. They can be tough on Muni turf. But they glide through a nice plush fairway.
When Maltby does thier new MB designs in a year or so I really hope they have the TS-1 sole.
I know the TS-2 design doesnt suit your eye but they are even better for a digger.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
On 9/30/2019 at 4:27 PM, jlukes said:

If you are blindly buying clubs based on the MPF, then you are doing it wrong.

If you want Maltby irons, that's fine - the the MPF really has no weight outside of Maltby trying to push their own products.

 

850 forged were a great club.  If you are looking for something even more forgiving and higher launching that still looks good, check out the TMade P790, MIzuno 919 Hot Metal or Hot Metal Pros, Srixon 585s, etc.  

 

Not sure you understand how the MPF works. Search Maltby MPF. You will see all the top brands list, and yes, the MPF rating works very well. 

Edited by 10shot
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/30/2019 at 4:19 PM, Reid Thompson said:

Considering MMB 17, TE Forged and TS-1s. I hit the ball too low and have an out to in bias that produces toe hits often. I am a 2 but have no ego. I do like less graphics on clubs however and that knocked out TS-2s. I don't love the looks of the TE forged and that will lose in a tie breaker. I want the highest flying, easy to hit club out of the 3 (Seem very close in MPF, could it be for MMBs?? ). Coming from JPX 850 Forged which are surprisingly low on MPF.

Good luck

I have several sets of Maltby irons, TE in my bag now. I switch to the DBM set when I feel like a change. I hit the TS-1 at Golf Works in the spring (19), well balanced head strikes the ball well. It is a filled head, I prefer straight Forged. The MPF factor is a well received weighting system used by several company's, you wont go wrong using it.

IMO I would avoid the KE4 series no one liked them in class, neither did I. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest having Golfworks put together a couple of 7 irons for you in the heads you are considering.  I bought a set of TS-2's based on finding the TT Elevate shafts to be a great fit for me in the Callaway Apex 19's.  Thought I could get the performance of the Elevates without paying OEM rates.  Sadly, I was wrong.  I don't find the TS-2's to be very forgiving despite their high MPF rating.  And, I really don't care for the look of the short irons.  And, the sole wants to bounce on the turf.  So, spend the money to try before you buy is my advice.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had to give up the TEs because they just went too high for me. Great heads though, I just hit it high already and the TE just went even higher.

I have the TS1s right now and I love them.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So I have heard of Maltby and Golfworks but found their shaft comparisons and really started digginf deeper into MPF & all of Maltby's offering. I have never tried any of their clubs but am very intrigued for the fact that they have clubs for such a low cost and tout SGI forgiveness in compact/players heads. I see reviews on their site and have seen players here who play them but how closely do they compare to the clubs of 3x the price?

Are there any demo/trials for these clubs like sub70 do or is it just a buy and test methodology?

I have tried to understand how iron heads MPF is calculated but saw nothing on it. the Shaft rating is all based on speed, trajectory, control vs distance, and slice/hook bias.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So I have heard of Maltby and Golfworks but found their shaft comparisons and really started digginf deeper into MPF & all of Maltby's offering. I have never tried any of their clubs but am very intrigued for the fact that they have clubs for such a low cost and tout SGI forgiveness in compact/players heads. I see reviews on their site and have seen players here who play them but how closely do they compare to the clubs of 3x the price?
Are there any demo/trials for these clubs like sub70 do or is it just a buy and test methodology?
I have tried to understand how iron heads MPF is calculated but saw nothing on it. the Shaft rating is all based on speed, trajectory, control vs distance, and slice/hook bias.
I have done quite a bit of head to head testing with Maltby heads and various OEM heads that match the design parameters. In every instance they have performed as good or better than the OEMs.
My most recent was a head to head of a Maltby TS-2 and a P790. Data showed launch, ballspeed, carry distances to be nearly identical. But what the Maltby did was spin more. On course testing showed the exact same results. The Maltby would stop near its ball mark the P790 would roll out in most cases further than I wanted.
Durability and looks, they are as good as anything made. Often times they are cast in the same foundaries as all of the other OEMs. They have innovated over the years and are often the first to bring new tech to the industry.
Over the years they have also done design work for several OEM companies.
If you want heads cheaper than thier retail for demos go on ebay. You often find single heads for sale. Go ahead and pay three times the cost for OEM.... you are not buying a head that's three times better

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/16/2019 at 10:33 PM, Popeye64 said:
I have done quite a bit of head to head testing with Maltby heads and various OEM heads that match the design parameters. In every instance they have performed as good or better than the OEMs.
My most recent was a head to head of a Maltby TS-2 and a P790. Data showed launch, ballspeed, carry distances to be nearly identical. But what the Maltby did was spin more. On course testing showed the exact same results. The Maltby would stop near its ball mark the P790 would roll out in most cases further than I wanted.
Durability and looks, they are as good as anything made. Often times they are cast in the same foundaries as all of the other OEMs. They have innovated over the years and are often the first to bring new tech to the industry.
Over the years they have also done design work for several OEM companies.
If you want heads cheaper than thier retail for demos go on ebay. You often find single heads for sale. Go ahead and pay three times the cost for OEM.... you are not buying a head that's three times better

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

Thanks for the feedback I was sure OEMs wouldn't be 3x better especially because of the reviews. I was just curious how they did stack up and it seems like they stack up well.

I was most curious about the TE & DBM vs Mizuno JPX919 Forged or similar club or even how it would compare to Sub70 639 series. I do like the look of most of their clubs never seen in person though.

Using MyGolfSpy mobile app
Edit: corrected Sub70 iron model

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Daily Deals

  • Sponsors

  • Our Sponsors

     
     
     

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      82,624
    • Most Online
      2,247

    Newest Member
    swagger100
    Joined
  • Similar Content

    • By edingc
      I received these wedges a few weeks ago from the Golfworks, and I thought I better post something since I had asked for opinions about them in another thread. I'll do my best to make this as real of a review as possible.
      I ordered 54-degree mid-sole and 60-degree wide sole M+ Series wedges with regular shafts from Golfworks for my birthday. I have completely rebuilt my bag over the past few months. Prior to owning these wedges, I only played with a 50-degree gap wedge from my old iron set and a 56-degree Nike SV Tour wedge that was almost exclusively used for flop type shots.
      The gap wedge in my Wilson C300 irons is 48 degrees, so these fit in six-degree increments from my irons.
      These were part of what Golfworks calls "Club Paks," which are grips, shafts, ferrules and heads sold for cheaper than the individual component cost. They also come with free assembly if you so desire. I opted for free assembly as I don't have my golf workshop fully setup (or even stocked!) yet.
      Golfworks offers three different sole widths (tour, mid, wide) from 50 degrees to 62 degrees in two degree increments. The packs offer a choice of regular or stiff shaft and undersize, standard, midsize or oversize grip.
      The package I purchased included the wedge head, a KBS Hi-Rev 2.0 regular flex wedge shaft, ferrule and a standard Lamkin Crossline grip. Each package cost $52.99. For two wedges, with taxes and shipping, I paid $123.99 total, or about $62 each. 
      First, some pictures for those interested. Please note these pictures were taken after an indoor range session. The ball marks were not there when purchased!







      Customer Service and Shipping
      I placed the order in mid-January, requesting free assembly and the clubs to be assembled to +1/2" from the Golfworks standard. The C300s are +1/2" from standard Golfworks lengths as well, so by opting to make the wedges a little longer they fit into the C300 lengths.
      Almost immediately I received a call from someone at Golfworks confirming I was requesting the clubs be built longer than their normal standard. I unfortunately missed this call and neglected to check my voicemail for more than a week. Whoops. Thankfully, within the next week someone else reached out to me and this time I caught the message.
      After calling to confirm the length, I also received a follow up email confirming my build specs. On this email I was able to request the grip be placed logo up and the shaft label to be placed logo down. Once the order was released to the club builders, it took only a day or two for it to ship Priority Mail, and then just another two days to receive the clubs.
      The clubs were securely packaged in transport and were received in perfect condition.
      Build Quality
      These seem to be built very well for the price. The heads look very finished. The black DBM finish Golfworks uses is very nice, and it is supposed to hold up much better than PVD. The grips were put on straight and the Crosslines feel as expected (the C300s come stock with Crosslines as well). Perhaps the only thing I could say is that the ferrules were not buffed to a perfectly smooth surface. Small gripe, I know.
      Size / Shape / Etc.
      I don't feel I am overly picky with wedges. The head shape seems traditional, not too big or small, and fits my eye fine. Black finish is matte and shouldn't cause any problems with glare.
      I opted for the wide sole 60-degree wedge as an "easy to swing" option from the sand or close to the green. You cannot really open the 60-degree up because of the wide sole. Until I can get out on the course and actually play, I don't know how this will affect my use of this club. I do think it will be very nice from thick rough as the wider sole should help keep the club face from being grabbed too much.
      The mid-sole 54-degree wedge has the perfect sole width for what I envision its use to be -- nearly full swing shots from the fairway. It feels more like my short irons than a "blade-y" wedge.
      I would probably opt for the mid-sole on the 60-degree wedge if I could go back in time.
      Feel / Playability
      I got a chance to hit a few range balls two weekends ago. I don't particularly care for hitting wedges from mats, but I probably hit 10 balls or so with each club. As you may be able to see in the pictures, I had a few poor strikes and a few good ones.
      The new grooves and milled face definitely shredded some cover off of the balls. I am still working on some swing changes, so there were some ugly hooks mixed in, but I was impressed with the ease of which the Hi-Revs launched and the stopping power. Using the 60-degree wedge I was able to get a ball to stay on the ice-covered 70-yard green, impressive to say the least.
      I was also able to hit the 54-degree wedge consistent in the 70-100 yard range, which is my expected use case.
      Because I ordered these +1/2", they come in a little heavier than standard specs. Based on my cheap Golfworks scale, they both are about at D6 swingweight. For comparison, my C300s are D2 across the set.
      I won't be able to play outdoors for another few weeks at the earliest, but I am excited to get these into real action.
      Final Thoughts (For now...)
      I think these are an excellent value for $62, especially given the more expensive shaft option. They do have cheaper "pak" options with this head in the $40 range as well. I doubt there is a ton of reason to spend more on a wedge. 
      Golfworks also routinely runs a free shipping promotion on orders greater than $60, so you can save a couple more dollars by waiting for that as well.
      My biggest concern at this point is whether the regular flex shafts were too soft of a choice, though I won't know for sure until I get out on the course.
    • By DPattGolf
      For those interested in the Players Distance category, Golfworks' Maltby line has just released their first option to the category in the TS-2 Forged. To me the design looks a bit similar to the Cobra Forged Tec Black with it's small cavity and with each head selling for $49.99 it seems like a potentially great lower priced option. Also of note, it sounds like a Blade version, like the P790, is in the works and hopefully will become available sometime this summer.
       
      Here is the overview of the TS-2 directly from Golfworks.com
       
      Overview
       
      The Maltby TS-2 forged irons were designed to enhance playability and distance typically not found in a true forged iron design. Utilizing the most advanced 5 step forging process available, the ST-2 irons feature a hollow 3 piece construction consisting of a thin, 2mm 1025C forged face and 1025C body with an internal tungsten weight positioned low and towards the toe for precise center of gravity locations throughout the set. The #4 iron thru #9 also feature an internal cavity behind the whole club face that is filled with dense polymer to enhance feel and boost the deflection of the thin carbon steel face at impact.
       
      Features:
      True Forged from 1025C Carbon Steel using the most advanced 5 step forging process available Hollow polymer injection filled 3 piece construction Forged titanium face and body with internal tungsten toe weighting to ensure the horizontal cg location is positioned in the center of the club face Injected Polymer produces exceptional sound and feel Thin, forged titanium face increases ball speeds for increased distance CNC milled face ensures face flatness for more consistency Multi-Groove technology places more CNC milled square grooves on the face for improved consistency, trajectory and spin Attractive and durable nickel chrome finish protects the club and enhances feel Progressive offsets to help square the face at impact in the long irons and improve alignment in the short irons. Progressive sole angle (bounce), modern tour leading edge grind and 4 way radius sole provides the optimum turf interaction from a variety of turf conditions. Modern lofts, combined with the optimal vertical cg locations, optimizes trajectory and distance. Universal hosel accepts both .370" parallel tip and .355" taper tip iron shafts. Recommended Ferrule - MA0300  

       
       
      I will also apologize now for the small images of the clubs.




    • By Jake from StateFarm
      Many of the bags here are sooooo nice.
      Here are a couple shots of mine
       
      Driver - Adams Super S driver with the stock Matrix S flex shaft
      Hybrids - 3, 4 TaylorMade RBZ
      Irons - 5-AW Mizuno JPX-825 Pros
      Wedges - 54, 58, 62 Maltby Tricept Wedges
      Putter - TaylorMade Ghost Manta C/S
      Bag - Mizuno Aerolite Stand Bag
      Prefered Ball - Bridgestone B330RXS Yellow
      Shoes - Adidas AdiZero Tour
      Cart - BagBoy Quad
       
       
       
       
    • By GolfSpy MBP
      Yesterday, along with my lovely wife and photographer the Mrs. MBP, we had the opportunity to check out the open house for the soon to open Modern Golf Vancouver.
       
      http://moderngolf.ca/
       
      Opening on February 11th you can see they still have yet to put together the glass and glam finishing touches we've come to associate their Toronto shop with, but what we did see really wow'd. This is a much needed facility for the lower mainland offering a true end to end fitting experience.
       
      Modern Golf will offer:
       
      Custom Club Fitting
      Custom Club Building
      Club Blueprinting/Specs
       
      The MBP is returning in a week to go through the entire spec lab/fitting experience, so keep an eye out for that write up.
       
      Until then, here's some pics of what we did get to see during our tour with Vancouver Manager Dean Walters & Toronto Partner Ian Fraser.
       
       
      Modern 59 Gear
       

       

       
       
      They knew Mrs. MBP was coming. Sadly cupcakes are not in their future plans...
       

       
       
      Spec & Blueprinting Lab
       

       

       
      I still haven't figured out this awkward moment...

       
       
      Shaft Wall!
       

       

       
      A $1200 what?

       
       
      The Fitting Room
       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       
      Oh look forum members KT-18 and Snoopy!

       
       
      Putting and Short Game Area
       

       
       
      This Area Confused Me, But Dean Referred to it as a Gym?
       

       

       

       
       
      And here's the rest of what to expect
       

       

       

       
       
      And yes it's Canada
       

       
       

  • Recent Topics

  • Latest from the Blog

  • Happy Birthday Today!

×
×
  • Create New...