Quigleyd 329 #121 Posted February 13 15 hours ago, PCAL said: You can sync the SX400 to your home wifi. Anytime you keep score or track your shots, come home and hit sync on the SX400. It will upload the information to SkyGolf and you can look at the data in SkyGolf360 or download their app to view it on your phone or tablet. When you sync it will also update the software and golf courses that have been updated by the SkyGolf mappers. This can also be done via the computer with cable, it is easier and quicker if you can connect to wifi. Thanks other than the initial set up. I have not had it back in the house. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AceOD 0 #122 Posted February 13 Was wondering if anyone can tell me about how the screen looks? How is the clarity (resolution) compared to say a smartphone? I am considering either the 400 or the 500 (if I choose a GPS) and wanted to know since I can't see one in person anywhere around me. The 500 has a much higher resolution screen which I wanted to see if it mattered or not. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnSmalls 3,615 #123 Posted February 13 28 minutes ago, AceOD said: Was wondering if anyone can tell me about how the screen looks? How is the clarity (resolution) compared to say a smartphone? I am considering either the 400 or the 500 (if I choose a GPS) and wanted to know since I can't see one in person anywhere around me. The 500 has a much higher resolution screen which I wanted to see if it mattered or not. Go back to page 5 and you'll see two different on course photos of the screen. Is it the clearest screen compared to the newest phones? No. Is it better than the first few generations of smartphones? Absolutely. I find it to be more than adequate. Without knowing the specs, I would venture to say the screen would rival midrange phones. The overall design of the graphics are basic almost vector-like. I find that makes the information very clear, discernible and scalable without distortion. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AceOD 0 #124 Posted February 13 2 hours ago, JohnSmalls said: Go back to page 5 and you'll see two different on course photos of the screen. Is it the clearest screen compared to the newest phones? No. Is it better than the first few generations of smartphones? Absolutely. I find it to be more than adequate. Without knowing the specs, I would venture to say the screen would rival midrange phones. The overall design of the graphics are basic almost vector-like. I find that makes the information very clear, discernible and scalable without distortion. Make sense... so you can't really tell if the resolution is low or not. The 400 only has a resolution of 540 by 1080, so not high res at all. The 500 is 1920 x 1080 so much higher. That just seems like a large difference for only $100 bucks more. Thanks for clarifying. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PCAL 6 #125 Posted February 13 25 minutes ago, AceOD said: Make sense... so you can't really tell if the resolution is low or not. The 400 only has a resolution of 540 by 1080, so not high res at all. The 500 is 1920 x 1080 so much higher. That just seems like a large difference for only $100 bucks more. Thanks for clarifying. On the side of the SX400 are two buttons to raise or lower the screen brightness, it defaults in the middle. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AceOD 0 #126 Posted February 13 2 minutes ago, PCAL said: On the side of the SX400 are two buttons to raise or lower the screen brightness, it defaults in the middle. Not talking about brightness, just actual screen resolution. Like the 400 has a Pixel per inch # of like 300 which is close to second gen iphone. The 500 has a screen with a resolution closer to a midrange smartphone today, around 440. I just don't know how that would look as I haven't seen the device in person. Hopefully that makes sense. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Digforged 0 #127 Posted February 13 1 hour ago, AceOD said: Not talking about brightness, just actual screen resolution. Like the 400 has a Pixel per inch # of like 300 which is close to second gen iphone. The 500 has a screen with a resolution closer to a midrange smartphone today, around 440. I just don't know how that would look as I haven't seen the device in person. Hopefully that makes sense. Where do these numbers come from? They don’t match the spec sheet. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AceOD 0 #128 Posted February 14 3 hours ago, Digforged said: Where do these numbers come from? They don’t match the spec sheet. the resolutions are from the specs on the website, the PPI is from math and internet verification (HERE) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Digforged 0 #129 Posted February 14 7 minutes ago, AceOD said: the resolutions are from the specs on the website, the PPI is from math and internet verification (HERE) Then wouldn’t the sx500 exceed the iPhone 11 for screen resolution? Or am I still missing the point? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AceOD 0 #130 Posted February 14 1 hour ago, Digforged said: Then wouldn’t the sx500 exceed the iPhone 11 for screen resolution? Or am I still missing the point? I get that with the 500, but this thread is about the 400.... really looking for feedback on that considering how bad the screen is spec wise. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TR1PTIK 1,685 #131 Posted February 14 2 hours ago, AceOD said: I get that with the 500, but this thread is about the 400.... really looking for feedback on that considering how bad the screen is spec wise. It's easy to get caught up in resolution, ppi, and display technologies. Ultimately, it all boils down to usage. In this case, the SX400 is more than adequate for its intended purpose. Part of the reason for the higher resolution on the SX500 (I suspect) is because it has the ability to take and display images and video (I think) taken on the course. As @JohnSmalls stated above, the graphics used for displaying the hole and providing distances are likely vector images otherwise they'd have serious trouble with scaling across numerous devices and have to duplicate efforts. To summarize, the screen looks great and is not something I'd be concerned with whatsoever. Unless taking pictures and videos on the course - sans smartphone - is important to you, save the extra $$$ and get the SX400. The size of the device is much more practical as well IMO. 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TR1PTIK 1,685 #132 Posted February 14 So I've attempted to use shot tracking on a couple rounds now, but have struggled with missed shots (because I didn't tag them). Anyone figure out how to add shots? I did at least figure out how to delete shots after the device auto-advanced to the next hole before I was done. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PCAL 6 #133 Posted February 14 14 hours ago, TR1PTIK said: So I've attempted to use shot tracking on a couple rounds now, but have struggled with missed shots (because I didn't tag them). Anyone figure out how to add shots? I did at least figure out how to delete shots after the device auto-advanced to the next hole before I was done. When you finish the round connect the SX400 to your home wifi and hit sync. This will upload your scoring and shot tracking data to SkyGolf360. To access SkyGolf360 you can download the app on your phone or go to www.skygolf.com. In the app, log in and on the home page is your most recent rounds. Click on the round and it will take you to your scorecard page. On the hole image click on edit/zoom, it expands the hole with tracked shots, then hold down your finger in the spot you missed to capture. It will pull up a grid of clubs and select the club you used, proceed to the next hole and repeat. Using your computer, go to www.skygolf.com, log in and click on my360profile at the top next to your name. Same as the app, it shows your recent rounds, click on the round to edit. Same process except you use your mouse to add shots missed. If you have time on the golf course, the same screen you learned to delete a shot, you can add one. Hold down your finger in the spot you missed to capture and add the shot. 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AceOD 0 #134 Posted February 19 Bought the sx400, opened it up today and the screen protector provided was dirty and not aligned... can’t make it work. Any idea how to get another one? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TR1PTIK 1,685 #135 Posted February 19 12 hours ago, AceOD said: Bought the sx400, opened it up today and the screen protector provided was dirty and not aligned... can’t make it work. Any idea how to get another one? The "screen protector" you're referring to is only meant to reduce the likelihood of damage during shipping and handling so you're unlikely to get another one from Sky Caddie. You can typically find similar films in the electronics department at Walmart that are cut-to-fit. It won't help you too much if you drop the device on concrete or asphalt (depending on how it lands), but it will save the screen from light scuffs and abrasions from being in your pocket or golf bag. For reference though, I peeled that thing off as soon as I got the SX400 and have had zero issues. EDIT: Just for good measure, I checked the Sky Golf store and see that they do have some sort of screen protector on the horizon, but no idea if it will be any better than what I just mentioned. I'd recommend checking this link periodically for any updates: https://shop.skygolf.com/c-61-lens-covers.aspx 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TR1PTIK 1,685 #136 Posted February 21 Played earlier today and compared the SX400 against Arccos, 18 Birdies, and SkyDroid for a few holes. Honestly, all were within 1-2 yards of each other to the center of the green. The SX400 is a little more friendly thanks to their hole maps vs. the other apps which rely on satellite imagery. It makes it much easier to distinguish between the various types of grass when hitting to the fairway or green. I'd like to share a bit more about the comparison, but I'm going to save it for my official review which will be dropping soon. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gregh729 64 #137 Posted Monday at 04:44 PM Finally got out again this weekend. As some of the others have said, it is very easy to use. I played a course I play alot that has multiple blind shots. My friends who have lasers have a tough time on this course because of the limited line of sight. My buddy used his laser and I used the Sky Caddie. Fun comparisons. Obviously, from the middle of the fairway with a clear view of the flag, both had similar readings. Where it got fun was from the rough (or trees) behind mounds/hills. The Sky Caddie showed good line and target while my buddy had to walk to the top of the hill to get clear line of sight. Hopefully the pics I'm attaching show this. I will try to pair up the SkyCaddie screen with the actual look The stats and scorecard are very easy to use. Very easy to input 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gregh729 64 #138 Posted Monday at 05:34 PM (edited) deleted duplicate post Edited Monday at 05:39 PM by gregh729 double post Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gregh729 64 #139 Posted Monday at 05:37 PM (edited) another one. Edited Monday at 05:40 PM by gregh729 dup Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnSmalls 3,615 #140 Posted Thursday at 07:26 PM Spent this past weekend playing 27 holes without the Skycaddie. The first 18 were on a course that I have never played with a lot of blind shots and strategically placed trouble in which I took many "vacations". The last 9 were on my home track. Even playing on a familiar course walking off distances, I still found myself in a bit of trouble without having the Skycaddie. We are coming down to the final stretch, are there any scenarios or questions that you guys have that we haven't covered? 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
