Jump to content

My Golf Spy Ball Lab Report-QStar Tour


Recommended Posts

Our Sponsors

8 hours ago, Berg Ryman said:

Perhaps you are correct to those who don't think critically about these things and take them at face value as being there across the brand. Of course, the inverse could also be true. People could be more intrigued and awaiting the result of those premium balls now to either prove that the issues are at lower price points, or that the issues are across the brand, when most might have not been interested in the Z line at all.

Excellent post.

I'm not ditching my Z-Star XVs just yet.  But I am interested in seeing the test results.  

  • Like 2

What's in the bag:
Driver - :cobra-small: F8 - Aldila NV Blue 60 ( S )
3 Wood (16*) - :cobra-small: F8 - Aldila NV Blue 60 ( S )
2 Iron - :mizuno-small: FliHi (18*) - Recoil 760 ( S )
4i - GW - :wilson_staff_small: D7 Forged - Recoil 760 ( S )
SW - LW - :cobra-small: F8 - N.S. Pro Modus3 Tour105 ( S )
Putter - :ping-small: Craz-e
Bag - :1590477705_SunMountain: 2.5 (Black)
Ball -  :srixon-small: Z-Star XV
Instagram - @hardcorelooper
Twitter - @meovino
Facebook - mike.eovino
 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I don't think this is the case at all Coincidental note. I met with a company rep today that its  ball is one of the "Big Boys" He came into my office literally an hour or so after I read th

I know this is a favorite ball of many of our readers.  Share your thoughts below.  I'm sure there will be several, considering the outcome.  https://mygolfspy.com/ball-lab-srixon-q-star-tour-gol

Perhaps you are correct to those who don't think critically about these things and take them at face value as being there across the brand. Of course, the inverse could also be true. People could be m

Posted Images

I played the AD333(Q Star in USA) for the first time last year and was amazed by the performance from an ionomer cover, especially the consistency off irons and spin around the greens. The only issue I had was the slightly too firm feel off mid and long irons.

I then tried the Q Star Tour hoping for similar performance but with softer feel... I could not believe the difference. I had approach shots flying way offline in both directions, balls dropping out of the air suddenly, chipping felt like using a power ball and had no spin on them, putting was near impossible.

This all makes a lot more sense now. Thanks MGS. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, LLS said:

I played the AD333(Q Star in USA) for the first time last year and was amazed by the performance from an ionomer cover, especially the consistency off irons and spin around the greens. The only issue I had was the slightly too firm feel off mid and long irons.

I then tried the Q Star Tour hoping for similar performance but with softer feel... I could not believe the difference. I had approach shots flying way offline in both directions, balls dropping out of the air suddenly, chipping felt like using a power ball and had no spin on them, putting was near impossible.

This all makes a lot more sense now. Thanks MGS. 

The AD333 is the ball I go to at this time of year. In Ohio, you can lose a ball on every tee shot... in plain sight in the Fall. The AD333 works well for me for distance and feel. It's cheap enough not to worry about losing in the leaves and glare. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
IBCR wasn't an issue for other ball test because the range was so small by comparison. Remember, IBCR is short for "In-Ball Compression Range". As Tony noted, it's common to see a range of 2 or 3 compression points for a single premium ball, but with the Q-Star Tour he was seeing ranges as high as 9.5 on the single worst ball measured.
I didn't see anywhere that said if IBCR on its own caused any balls to be considered bad, but I'd imagine that another production related issue would have.
Here's the quote from the report that got my attention. In short, are these considered bad because the deviation is much worse than compared to the other balls tested so far.

"My intent isn’t to pile it on, so to speak, but I felt the detailed explanation was necessary for you to understand why we flagged 42 percent of the Srixon Q-Star Tour balls we tested as bad based on the IBCR."

Take Dead Aim

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Tsmithjr9 said:

After the MGS report, a dozen MTB-X is the first thing I'm buying when Ohio thaws in the spring. I need to try that ball. I think the Z-Stars are great, so that's my Pro V1 alternative right now. Hard to pass up when 2 dozen Z-stars are cheaper than 1 dozen Pro V1.

Take Dead Aim
 

You won’t regret it.  Great balls!  Tried them this year myself after reading such good reviews on the last round of tests and am hooked.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the testing results for Srixon Q Star Tour balls were that bad I have a bad feeling for my Inesis Tour 900 balls. They belong in the budget bracket too. I guess it is better to know than not to... Sigh... 

Driver: :titelist-small: TS2, 9,5°, Fujikura Ventus Blue 6S

Fairway::taylormade-small: M5 15°, Fujikura Ventus Red 7S

Hybrids: :titelist-small: 818 H1 (19°) Tensei CK White 90S, :titelist-small: 818 H1 (21°) Tensei CK White 90S

Irons: :srixon-small: Z565, 5-A, Nippon Modus 105S,

Wedges: :cleveland-small: RTX-3, 56°/11°, 62°/8°, Nippon Modus 115 Wedge

Putter: :cleveland-small: TFI 2135 8.0, 35''

Waiting for their chance to shine:

:srixon-small: Z U65, 3 iron (20°), Mitsubishi Tensei CK Pro White Hybrid 90S; 

:srixon-small: Z U65, 4 iron (23°); Nippon Modus 105S

:srixon-small: Z565 4 iron; Nippon Modus 105S

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Micah T said:

My point is: if you liked them and played well with them, does this change the fact you scored well? If you didn’t like them, now you feel justified: obviously no one is going to switch to a QST now, but if you bought them on deal, what now?

 

Data is always good, and I love reading these articles, but I’ll be damned if 20 out of 30 lowest all time rounds from the last 2 years aren’t all with chromesoft...

 

Does that mean the test is wrong? No, of course not. But it doesn’t invalidate anyone’s individual experience either.

 

Sent from my iPhone using MyGolfSpy

 

I understand your point, I do. 

My point is, MGS has just shown us, with data to prove it, that over a third of the balls in a dozen are likely to not be round, and to be inconsistent from a compression standpoint.  In all likelihood the round you're describing would be with one of the good ones from the batch.  Show me the mean and range across scores throughout the dozen, and this test would suggest the range would show an appreciable variance in scoring.

To continue with this worn out "indian vs arrow" analogy, it's still possible to hit the target with a crooked arrow, but its certainly harder than if you just had a straight arrow.  Golf has enough variables making it hard, introducing the potential to have a not-round ball is one variable I'm glad MGS is helping me avoid.

  • Like 3

Driver: :honma:TR20 460, Vizard 60g Stiff

FW: :tour-edge: CBX 119 3w, 15,  Project X Evenflow Blue 75g Stiff

Hybrids: :titelist-small: TS3 3 & 4H, Project X Evenflow Blue 85g Stiff

Driving Iron: :mizuno-small: MP-20 HMB 3i, UST Mamiya recoil ES 780 F3

Iron: :mizuno-small:JPX 919 Forged 4- GW, Project X 6.0

Wedges::vokey-small:SM7 54 S Grind, 58 M Grind

Putter: :EVNROLL: ER2B 

:SuperSpeed:

Tested the Honma TR20 460 driver

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just hope they don’t start hand selecting the good balls, packing them up and trying to sell them for $70+ a box... 😳 😂

  • Like 1
  • Haha 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, Getoffmylawn said:

My point is, MGS has just shown us, with data to prove it, that over a third of the balls in a dozen are likely to not be round, and to be inconsistent from a compression standpoint. 

The test methods and data Tony is gathering is pure awesomeness.  However, statistically he is looking at but a fraction of the production runs and we have no way of knowing whether this is an isolated case or systemic and reflective of thee normal build process.  That he is buying the various test ball randomly and through retail channels, without any opportunity for bias, is great - but it is still a very, very small sample.

  • Like 1

:ping-small: G410 Plus, 9 Degree Driver | Official 2019 MGS Tester

:ping-small: G400 SFT, 16 Degree 3w

:ping-small: G400 SFT, 19 Degree 5w

:ping-small: G410 Irons 4-UW 

:ping-small: Glide 2.0 56 Degree SW   (removed from double secret probation 😍)

:ping-small: B61 Putter

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, fixyurdivot said:

The test methods and data Tony is gathering is pure awesomeness.  However, statistically he is looking at but a fraction of the production runs and we have no way of knowing whether this is an isolated case or systemic and reflective of thee normal build process.  That he is buying the various test ball randomly and through retail channels, without any opportunity for bias, is great - but it is still a very, very small sample.

Sure, but certainly an indicator of a problem...it's extremely unlikely Tony got unlucky in the balls he picked up.  I suppose it's possible this is localized to one production run, but it's equally as likely (frankly, probably more so) that this is rooted in the overall build process.  In the end, what each of us chooses to do with this info is our own decision. 

  • Like 2

Driver: :honma:TR20 460, Vizard 60g Stiff

FW: :tour-edge: CBX 119 3w, 15,  Project X Evenflow Blue 75g Stiff

Hybrids: :titelist-small: TS3 3 & 4H, Project X Evenflow Blue 85g Stiff

Driving Iron: :mizuno-small: MP-20 HMB 3i, UST Mamiya recoil ES 780 F3

Iron: :mizuno-small:JPX 919 Forged 4- GW, Project X 6.0

Wedges::vokey-small:SM7 54 S Grind, 58 M Grind

Putter: :EVNROLL: ER2B 

:SuperSpeed:

Tested the Honma TR20 460 driver

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Golfspy_CG2 said:

forum readers which is really like 1% of the golf playing market. 

That much? That's pretty awesome! 😄

I nearly snagged a couple doz with the summer BOGO to see if I could benefit from the lower spin on the long game while still keeping some greenside action, but opted not to (mostly since QST for ~$16/doz vs ZStar XV for ~$20/doz seems like an unfair comparison. Of course I'll pay $4 for a ball I know works for me.)

Driver: :callaway-small: Epic Flash Subzero 9* loft with HZDRUS Smoke stiff
4-wood: :callaway-small: Mavrik Subzero (16.5*) with Aldila Rogue White 130 MSI X
2-hybrid: :taylormade-small: GAPR Lo with stock KBS Hybrid 80g stiff
3i-PW: :ping-small: i210 blue dot, Power Spec, with TT DG S300 hard stepped

50* :vokey-small: SM7 TT DG S200
54*, and 58*: :mizuno-small: blue ion S18 with TT wedge
Putter: :ping-small: Redwood Piper 0*; :taylormade-small:Spider Tour Black

Ball: :srixon-small: Z STAR XV (but I'm not just going to leave a perfectly good ProV1/x laying around...)
Bag: :ping-small: Hoofer (2018) in black/white/copper

Using :Arccos: to keep track of my shots
All clubs RH

Tested:
:wilson_staff_small: D7 Forged 3-PW, KBS Tour-V 110S - Official Review

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Getoffmylawn said:

Sure, but certainly an indicator of a problem...it's extremely unlikely Tony got unlucky in the balls he picked up.  I suppose it's possible this is localized to one production run, but it's equally as likely (frankly, probably more so) that this is rooted in the overall build process.  In the end, what each of us chooses to do with this info is our own decision. 

Oh Lord, this got me to thinking about Covid data and statistics 🤪

There are many, many examples of production runs gone bad (think recalls).  With the exception of the Kirkland (splitting ball) fiasco, I don't remember ever seeing other golf balls being recalled.  First, they are not controlled by secondary agencies or introduce public risk (though on any given day, I've witnessed things on golf courses that would suggest otherwise 🙂), and secondly, the vast majority of users would never notice the less than optimal condition.

We don't know how many different production runs have been done.  Is this factory only producing Srixon balls?  What if there are dozens of production runs/lots made; is it reasonable to presume all are good or bad?  To me, this merits a further deep dive into the weeds.  I would not be surprised if Srixon contacts Tony about this simply because of the potential negative impact to sales.  Presuming there are numerous production lots, a sampling of some of those would help the confidence level in determining isolated or systemic.

I'm sitting at the Ford dealer in Butte getting service for... your first two guesses don't count... so this defective part thing is fresh on my mind. 🤬

  • Like 2

:ping-small: G410 Plus, 9 Degree Driver | Official 2019 MGS Tester

:ping-small: G400 SFT, 16 Degree 3w

:ping-small: G400 SFT, 19 Degree 5w

:ping-small: G410 Irons 4-UW 

:ping-small: Glide 2.0 56 Degree SW   (removed from double secret probation 😍)

:ping-small: B61 Putter

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Micah T said:

Doesn’t look good for Srixon, but I still don’t know what these results mean for the person playing the Q-star. Another archer vs arrow debate I’m sure.


Sent from my iPhone using MyGolfSpy

I would be surprised that the ball manufacturers are NOT following the MGS Ball Testing.  With the history of the testing and response from Callaway (Chromesoft), and the manner in which information spreads across social media platforms... yea, very surprised.  

Perhaps more perplexing to me is that these types of inconsistencies are not found during production QC.  Do they not test? Do they not care? I mean it's not like the attributes Tony is testing are completely esoteric to what constitutes a good golf ball.  Moreover is that whatever attributes a ball has, that it is not consistent seems the bigger issue.  

The good news to us golfers is that MGS may drive these mfg.s to start caring more about product performance and consistency... yielding better value to the consumer 👍.  Go get em Tony!!

  • Like 4

:ping-small: G410 Plus, 9 Degree Driver | Official 2019 MGS Tester

:ping-small: G400 SFT, 16 Degree 3w

:ping-small: G400 SFT, 19 Degree 5w

:ping-small: G410 Irons 4-UW 

:ping-small: Glide 2.0 56 Degree SW   (removed from double secret probation 😍)

:ping-small: B61 Putter

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Getoffmylawn said:

I understand that, I'm simply saying I don't think it's accurate to call it "unfair" of Tony or MGS to not test Srixon's premium ball first.  They tested a premium ball from Titleist and Bridgestone because, as @Golfspy_CG2points out, those are the big volume balls...the Pro V1 and the Tour B XS "Tiger Ball".  If anyone walked away from those tests assuming the evaluations applied to all Titleist balls or all Bridgestone balls, then they drastically missed the point and are making some big inferences. Similarly, one shouldn't make blanket assumptions about all Srixon balls now.

MGS' decision to select and prioritize testing based on volume of sales is consistent with their intent to focus on the consumer and do what's most helpful to the consumer.  Put another way, fairness to the consumer before fairness to the OEM. (And again, I don't see how this is unfair.)

Another reason it was nice when they waited and released all the ball data at once like 2019. Then you could draw conclusions about brands and individual models. From what I gather MGS didn't do that this time around because a) testing was more extensive, and b) they'd like to monetize the project (subscription?) this time around? Please correct me if I'm wrong there.

Seeing one ball a week means we all need to be careful to reserve some judgements until we've seen more complete data...

  • Like 1
  • Callaway Rogue 10.5° 9.5°D & 3W
  • Mizuno JPX900 Forged 4-GW, S18 56.10, S18 60.06
  • Evnroll ER5B (replaced ER2)
  • and 14th club - Mizuno CLK 3H 19° OR MP-20 HMB 3i 19°
  • Snell MTB-X (replaced Black)
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an eye opener.  I had a pretty good impression of Srixon balls but now I’m going to need to reassess.  I had normally played Z stars, so it will be interesting to see those results.

Edited by Abendew

Talk about a hole in one.  - Happy Gilmore (1996)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve been playing the Q Tour for a while. I like them but now I have to question when I play bad it it the ball? Maybe a combo of bad play/bad ball. I’ll probably never know.
I’m sure Srixon will correct the issue quickly.



Sent from my iPhone using MyGolfSpy

  • Like 2

Rick

 

 

Left Hand, 

Driver; Ping G410 Plus

5 Wood; Cally Steelhead 

5 Hybrid; Cally Steelhead

Irons; Ping G410 5-SW & Mizno 919 Hot Metal 5-SW

Putter; Waaay too many to list

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Tsmithjr9 said:

Here's the quote from the report that got my attention. In short, are these considered bad because the deviation is much worse than compared to the other balls tested so far.

"My intent isn’t to pile it on, so to speak, but I felt the detailed explanation was necessary for you to understand why we flagged 42 percent of the Srixon Q-Star Tour balls we tested as bad based on the IBCR."

Take Dead Aim
 

Ah, I missed that when I went back through last night just skimming the report for info. Still, I wouldn't expect based on what was stated for there to be any IBCR related fallout with the other ball models tested. Maybe, it will be something that comes up again down the line.

  • Like 2

Driver: Mizuno ST190 9.5* Fujikura Atmos Blue 5S
Fairway Wood: Mizuno ST190 15* Fujikura Atmos Blue 6S
Hyrbrid: Mizuno CLK 19* Fujikura Speeder EVO HB
Irons: Nike Vapor Pro Combo (4-PW) Dynamic Gold Pro S300
Wedges: Bridgestone Tour B XW-1 50*, 54*, & 58* Nippon Modus 3 105
Putter: Scotty Cameron Futura 6m 33"
Ball: Bridgestone Tour B XS
Bag: 2017 Titleist Players 5 Stand Bag

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, greggarner said:

That much? That's pretty awesome! 😄

I nearly snagged a couple doz with the summer BOGO to see if I could benefit from the lower spin on the long game while still keeping some greenside action, but opted not to (mostly since QST for ~$16/doz vs ZStar XV for ~$20/doz seems like an unfair comparison. Of course I'll pay $4 for a ball I know works for me.)

LOL...And that's members of all forums like us and WRX and the smaller ones! 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

:titelist-small: TS1 Fubuki 45g R Flex

:ping-small:  G410 FW 5, 7 Alta CB R flex 

:ping-small: G410 Hybrid 26 degree Alta CB R Flex

:titelist-small: T100S/T200 Combo 5-7 T100S 8-P T200 TT Black Oynx R Flex

:titelist-small: SM7 54.08 F 58.12 K 

:scotty-small:  Phantom 5.5   35" 

:titelist-small: ProV1X Play number 12

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still no response from Srixon?  Do they not care that their mid level ball got such a bad review?  

I'd assume that from the number of balls that were bad that they essentially don't have any QC reviewing what comes out of Indonesia.

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, jjfcpa said:

Still no response from Srixon?  Do they not care that their mid level ball got such a bad review?  

I'd assume that from the number of balls that were bad that they essentially don't have any QC reviewing what comes out of Indonesia.

They're too busy chewing out the QC person. 

  • Like 1

Left Hand orientation

:ping-small: G410 SFT driver 

Cobra F Max 5 wood
:ping-small:  410  Hybrids 22*, 26*

Cobra Speed Zone 6-GP/Recoil ESX 460 F3 Shafts 

:titelist-small: SM7 54* Wedge

:ping-small: Glide 3.0  60* Wedge

:odyssey-small: O Works putter
:918457628_PrecisionPro:NX9-HD

:CaddyTek: - 4 Wheel 
:footjoy-small: - too many shoes to list and so many to buy

:1590477705_SunMountain: And  BAG Boy 

2020 Official Tester :SuperSpeed: Beginning Driver Speed  - 78

2019 Official Tester :ping-small:  410 Driver

2018 Official Tester :wilson-small: C300

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...