Jump to content
TESTERS WANTED! ×

Golfspy Matt "Plays His Best" with PING


Matt Saternus

Recommended Posts

PART 1: The

PING Fitting Process

 

 

PING Fitting (4).jpg

 

 

 

 

 

Regular MGS reader have seen, over the past few months, full investigations into the fitting process at Wilson Golf, Titleist, Callaway, TaylorMade and Club Champion. As I sat back and thought about this, it occurred to me that there was a glaring omission: PING. How can you talk about custom fitting and leave out the company that brought custom fitting to the masses? Never one to ignore such an oversight, I contacted PING to discuss the idea of a story about their fitting process.

 

 

 

 

 

PING Fitting (8).jpg

 

 

 

 

 

My initial idea was to do something similar to what Dave and Tim did with Callaway and Titleist: go to their headquarters for a fitting and some spy work. My contact at PING said (I'm paraphrasing), “We could give you a VIP fitting, but that's something that 99.9% of the golfers out there will never get the chance to experience. Why not write about the fitting process that's available to each and every golfer interested in PING?” Much as I wanted to see the Ping Putter Vault, I agreed that this was the better story.

 

 

 

 

PING Fitting (10).jpg

 

 

 

 

 

The Friday of the BMW Championship, I went to Zigfield Troy, a driving range and par 3 golf course in the Chicago suburbs. I was introduced to Mark, the resident PGA Professional, who would be conducting my fitting. A PING fitting starts with the player interview. Mark asked me what types of scores I usually shoot, my ball flight, the types of clubs I play now, among other things (you can see the long version of the PING fitting questionnaire here: http://www.ping.com/...estionnaire.pdf).

 

 

 

 

 

PING Fitting (5).jpg

 

 

 

 

 

The second step is a Static Fitting. Mark asked my height (6'1”) and took my wrist-to-floor measurement (35”, I think). My static measurements put me into a club that is either standard length or ¼” over, and a green dot (2.25* upright). That gave us our starting point.

 

 

 

 

PING Fitting (6).jpg

 

 

 

 

 

The third step is the Dynamic Swing Test. Mark started me off with a G20 iron, standard length, green dot. I hit a few shots off the lie board and we concluded that it was too upright for me. PING estimates that about 30% of golfers fit into the clubs that their static measurements dictate, but obviously I was not part of that group. We stepped down to a blue dot (.75* upright) and found that it was still too upright. When we tested a black dot (standard lie), the lie tape told us that we had found the right fit. At this point, Mark and I discussed the repercussions of choosing a club that was even flatter or shading towards my static measurements and going with a blue dot. Mark told me that it came down to what side I feared more: if I was more afraid of a miss to the left, we could go flatter, or more upright if I feared the right side. Ultimately we decided to stick with what the lie tape said and go with the black dot.

 

 

 

 

 

PING Fitting (1).jpg

 

 

PING Fitting (2).jpg

 

 

 

 

 

The fourth step (and final, for today) step is the Ball Flight Analysis. To me (and I think club junkies will agree), this is the fun part: mixing and matching heads and shafts to find the best possible ball flight. To do this we employed Flight Scope and PING's nFLIGHT system. We started with the aforementioned G20 iron and PING's CFS shaft. The first thing that I noticed was that the G20 does not care if you hit it fat, thin, or flush, it's going to produce a high shot that goes a very consistent distance. While the ballflight was very good, my problem with this combination was that the shaft was a little too light. From earlier fittings, I have learned about the impact of shaft weight on the swing, and I know that I need a shaft in the 120 gram range. Mark noticed the inconsistency as well and switched me into a KBS Tour shaft, my normal iron shaft of choice. This created a marked improvement in the consistency of my swing. Though the numbers I produced with the G20 were good, the look and feel were quite different than what I'm used to. Mark switched the G20 head for the Anser, and I was instantly more comfortable. The numbers were every bit as good as the numbers I created with the G20, but in a club that gave me the look and feel that I prefer. After a very exhaustive process, the irons were set: Anser irons with KBS Tour

 

 

 

 

PING Fitting (3).jpg

 

 

 

 

 

From there, we moved to the driver. I currently play a 9.5* driver, so Mark started me out with the G20 driver, 9.5* in the TFC 169 Tour stiff shaft. What Mark and I both noticed immediately, both by seeing it with our eyes and from the nFLIGHT software, was that I was not spinning the ball enough. The spin deficit was so large that we changed both the head and shaft immediately: 10.5* with the TFC 169 non-Tour stiff. While this was a marked improvement, the spin was still a bit too low. Mark approached the next change cautiously, saying, “Well…we could try a 12* head.” Clearly Mark has fit many golfers who view low driver loft as a declaration of their manhood. I just smiled and told him, “I'll play anything that makes the ball go farther.” With the 12* head, my launch and spin numbers were consistently better and I picked up an average of 10 yards of carry. The best part of the driver fitting was the combination of seeing ballflight and getting launch monitor numbers. Most people are fit on launch monitors indoors, so they never get to see what ideal ballflight really looks like. Through the PING fitting, I was able to see the ballflight firsthand and have a monitor confirm that the ballflight that I just saw was ideal.

 

 

 

 

 

PING Fitting (7).jpg

 

PING Fitting (9).jpg

 

 

 

 

 

With the driver and irons set, we went about filling in the rest of the bag. There were both the Tour-S and Anser wedges for me to try, and I immediately fell for the Ansers. I've always really liked the weight of PING wedges, and when that was combined with the forged feel of the Ansers, I knew I had found a winner.

 

 

PING Fitting (12).jpg

 

 

PING Fitting (13).jpg

 

 

 

 

 

Finally, I was also fit into a G20 4 wood and a 20* G20 hybrid. Opting for the 4 wood instead of the 3 wood was another example of how important the fitting process is. Most golfers, myself included, instinctively grab a 3 wood as their longest off-the-deck club. I found, through the launch monitor fitting, that the 4 wood was not only easier to elevate, but it was actually longer than the 3 wood for me. The G20 hybrid was the final piece of the puzzle, and it was a natural fit to replace the 3 iron. The hybrid offered more distance and a more playable trajectory.

 

 

 

 

PING Fitting (11).jpg

 

 

 

 

 

Overall, my fitting with PING was not only fun but very informative. This was the first time I had been fit outdoors with a launch monitor, and I think it makes a huge difference. The confidence that I gained from this process was huge. I was also very impressed with PING's nFLIGHT software. It's extremely helpful for organizing the wealth of information that the launch monitor creates, making product recommendations, and helping the golfer to put together a set with appropriate distance gaps.

 

Over the next few weeks and months, I will be doing some in depth reviews of the new PING products that will be in my bag for the 2012 golf season. If everything goes well, I will even have some on-the-course experiences to write about. You can look for the next installment in about a week: a discussion of PING's new Anser Milled Putters and the iPING fitting software. Until then, please feel free to ask any questions about the PING fitting process or anything else that piqued your curiosity and I will do my best to give you the answers.

Follow me on Twitter: @MattSaternus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice review on many levels. Funny you mentioned about a 12* driver. I play an old G5 and that is what I use. I went to Ping HQ here in Canada and lucky for me it is right around the corner so to speak. That is what they felt would be best for me. Many would be very wise to get their driver checked as a lot of the OEM companies routinely have lower…/higher stamped lofts, than actual lofts. Plenty of people would be surprised at what they are really playing.

 

Anyone close to the Canadian border (East coast) or those that live in the Ontario area that play or have a goal of playing Ping and that would include anyone who purchased their Pings used should go to the Canadian (Oakville) Ping HQ. The fitting is free and I've been a few times and you will get the Tour treatment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice review Matt. Sounds like a very cool setup. The Lineup from Ping this year is STELLAR!! I have almost convinced myself to put the G20 into play... Just waiting for the I20 to show up....

Driver - Ping G430 Max 9° | Ventus Blue TR 
Hybrid - :srixon-small: ZX 16° & 18° | GD Tour IZ S

2 Iron - :srixon-small: ZU65 17° | AeroTech SteelFiber 110icw S

Irons -  :srixon-small: ZX7 MKII  4-Pw | TTDGTI S400, std length  1° flat
Wedges - :cleveland-small: RTX 6 Tour Rack 50° 54° 58° | TTDGTI S400, std length 1° flat

Putter -  L.A.B. Golf Link.1 | LA Golf P135 shaft | Garsen Quad Tour grip
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awesome fitting experience, I wish all companies would do that!!

Whats in the bag:

 

Titleist 910D2 10.5 Graphite Design Y7-S

Adams 1600 proto 14.5 Graphite Design AD DJ

Titleist 910F 17 Ust Tour Black

Titleist 910H 22 Diamana Kali

Adams Idea Pro A12 4-9 KBS C Taper

Titleist Vokey SM4 46 degree w/ DG Spinner

Mizuno MP R12 50-54-58 DG spinner

Ping Redwood ZB

Ball Nike 20XI-X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • SPY VIP

Fun experience. What are those shoes?

 

Muira and now PING! Someone send me to TN to see what Scratch and Don can build for me. I'll pay for my own tour department set, and do a write up. pleeeease?

 

Fairly certain Matt is wearing Kikkors.

MyGolfSpy is only major golf site that refuses advertising from large golf companies. With your support we can keep it that way. Donate Today
 


Subscribe to the MyGolfSpy Newsletter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fun experience. What are those shoes?

 

Muira and now PING! Someone send me to TN to see what Scratch and Don can build for me. I'll pay for my own tour department set, and do a write up. pleeeease?

 

They are Kikkors, as T correctly guessed. Sadly, after a full season, they are starting to lose their traction. This really isn't too sad, though...have you seen their 2012 line up!?!?! Also rocking a Bonobos polo, FWIW.

 

Thanks to everyone for all the nice comments. Hopefully the subsequent posts will prove helpful or at least interesting.

Follow me on Twitter: @MattSaternus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awesome fitting experience, I wish all companies would do that!!

 

Agreed. It's another instance of PING doing things differently than others, and, IMO, better than others. To my mind, if you're going to have people fitting golfers for your product, why not have a clear, step-by-step process that leads to consistently good results? Why not create easy-to-use, helpful software that makes sense of the launch monitor data? The cynical side of me says that companies don't do this because it does not directly benefit the bottom line. These are the things, however, that allow PING to enjoy a level of loyalty from their customers that few others OEMs enjoy.

Follow me on Twitter: @MattSaternus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PART 2A: iPING Putter Fitting

 

 

 

I'm going to break this update into two pieces: one about the iPING putter fitting and another about PING's Anser Milled putters.

 

In my initial article about the PING fitting process, I did not discuss the part of the fitting that might have the biggest impact on your scorecard: the putter fitting. While many golfers understand the value of being fit for the driver or their irons, putter fitting is still shrouded in mystery. With the introduction of the iPING app, PING seeks to remove the mystery from putter fitting.

 

By this point, most of you probably have some familiarity with the iPING app as a training aid (if not, check out MyGolfSpy's review here: http://www.mygolfspy.com/iping-putter-app-review ). What you may not be aware of is the fact that it has a putter fitting component. The fitting is every bit as easy to use as the practice mode: simply hit 5 putts. The iPING app will record your strokes and fit you into one of three profiles: strong arc, slight arc, or straight, referring to your stroke path. From there, it will recommend certain putter models in the PING line that will fit your stroke. You can also take the fitting a step further by adding some static measurements to receive length and lie angle recommendations.

 

My putter fitting was actually conducted by my local PING rep well in advance of my day at Zigfield Troy. He was in my shop and used me as a guinea pig to show the others in the shop how iPING works. After hitting my five putts, iPING told me that I was on the high end of the “Slight Arc” group. This was not a surprise, as I have been on SAM before and seen the same results. What was very surprising was the length and lie recommendations. The iPING app recommended a 35” putter, 2* upright. I found this hard to believe as I have always preferred a shorter putter (33”-33.5”) and a flatter lie angle (69*-70*).

 

Reluctantly, I ordered my Anser putter at the recommended specs…and I am glad that I did. The iPING-recommended specs put me in an address position that 3 out of 3 PGA Professionals believe to be more fundamentally sound, and I feel like I am putting a firmer, more confident stroke on the ball. Though I have had only once chance to bring the new putter to the course, the results were very promising: no three-putts, and excellent distance control on long lag putts.

 

For those of you looking to buy a new putter, whether it is a PING or not, I would strongly recommend downloading the iPING app and using the fitting tool. Considering that the cradle only costs $30, there is really no excuse to go to the golf shop and just buy the first putter that feels good. Get fit and play your best!

 

 

Follow me on Twitter: @MattSaternus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PART 2B: The PING Anser Milled Putter

 

Hello, my name is Matt, and I am a putter addict.

 

While I love all golf equipment, no other club holds quite the same appeal for me as the flatstick. I'm not sure if it's the level of customization and craftsmanship involved, the endless variety of styles, finishes, and materials, or the importance to your scorecard, but ever since I started playing I have been obsessed with putters. For me it started with Scotty Cameron, which, being new to the game, I thought was the pinnacle of putters. From there, I made the jump to custom putters by boutique brands like Bettinardi and Byron Morgan, and I never thought I would ever play a production putter again. At least, that's what I thought until I saw the Anser Milled putter by PING. It was the look that first caught my eye: a very understated, fully milled putter with a satin nickel finish topped off with a stepless shaft and a slick (metaphorically speaking) grey cord grip. It was the feel, however, that made me decide to put one in the bag: it's among the softest feeling putters I've ever used. The cherry on top was a custom blue and white PING WRX paintfill* that pays homage to my alma mater, Duke University.

 

PING offers an Anser Milled putter for every stroke: the Anser, Anser 1, Anser 2, and Anser 3 for the slight arc, Anser 4 & 6 for the strong arc, and the Anser 5 for the straight back straight through player. The Anser Milled series retails for $299, and is a must-try for anyone looking to put a premium putter in the bag.

 

Enjoy the pictures!

 

 

 

*Any PING club (putter, wedge, iron) can receive a custom PING WRX paintfill for $8.50. This can be done for an existing PING club or as part of a new custom order.

 

Ping Anser (1).JPG

Ping Anser (2).JPG

Ping Anser (3).JPG

Ping Anser (4).JPG

Ping Anser (5).JPG

Ping Anser (6).JPG

Ping Anser (7).JPG

Ping Anser (8).JPG

Follow me on Twitter: @MattSaternus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

knowing as much of a putter addict as you are, I'm VERY curious to see how long you game the anser for and how you feel about it after a few rounds.

 

It's funny: as much as I love putters, I am very loyal to gamers. The Bettinardi I've been using lasted two full seasons before the Anser took it's place. I will definitely keep you all posted on how it goes.

Follow me on Twitter: @MattSaternus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Anser saw it's first real round today and did admirably. Made a couple of birdies, a couple par saves, and all the easy stuff inside 5'. Still adjusting to the new set up and trying to figure out exactly what I'm trying to feel power the stroke. Thankfully this week has the promise of more golf, so I'll be able to figure that out.

Follow me on Twitter: @MattSaternus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt, very nice work. Do you know what kind of launch monitor Ping uses? Regarding your putter fitting, have you ever had a SAM fitting? You might really find that enlightening.

 

At this location, it was a FlightScope. I also know that some of the PING reps were using Foresight monitors this summer.

 

I have been on a SAM machine once, and I loved it. I could have spent all day messing around on it. Maybe I should try to convince the people at SAM that their machine needs a review. :lol:

Follow me on Twitter: @MattSaternus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Part 3:

Ping Anser Irons

 

Anser Irons (3).JPG

 

The next part of my PING bag arrived the other day: my PING Anser Irons.

 

The first thing I did when they arrived was to give them a quick spec check. Frequent MGS readers probably saw the lengthy discussion of build quality on Golfspy T's Miura blog post (part 1 and part 2), and so I was a bit nervous as to whether or not my (compulsively detailed) build requests had been met. Well, much to my delight, the irons were perfect: length, lie, loft, swingweight, grip size...PING nailed every detail.

 

I've only had one range session with these irons so far, but the early results are very impressive. For such a good looking club, there's plenty of forgiveness, but not at the cost of workability. These irons make it easy to hit the ball high, low, or shape it left and right. For those that haven't hit them, they're also a stark departure from the feel of a standard cast PING iron: very soft with plenty of feedback.

 

After more than 6 years of searching, I think I've finally found the irons that will permanently dethrone my trusty MX-23's. Keep your eyes on this thread as we move into 2012 for info on how these perform.

Anser Irons (1).JPG

Anser Irons (2).JPG

Anser Irons (4).JPG

Anser Irons (5).JPG

Anser Irons (6).JPG

Anser Irons (7).JPG

Follow me on Twitter: @MattSaternus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice sticks Matt. Like the grips a ton.

 

Thanks, the grips are...hmmm...I'd say they're "butter" but that's the opposite of what I mean. They're awesome, but they're hard and rough...so they're....huh...we golfers need a word for that.

 

One other thing that you can see in the address pics is how the set progressively changes shape. The long irons are more squared in the toe and leading edge, and the short irons are more rounded. It's a very gradual, natural change, but you can really see it when you jump between the 4I and the PW.

Follow me on Twitter: @MattSaternus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let the scoring begin!

 

May I ask how much for this set? Cost for the KBS upgrade?

 

I know a lot of people around that were also looking for a new set from PING, but where put down due to the higher price.

 

Those grips look familiar... I wonder who manufactures them for PING.

:cobra-small: SpeedZone 9* w/ Aldila Rogue Silver 60 S
:callaway-small: X2 Hot 3 Deep 14.5* w/ Aldila Tour Green 75 S
:taylormade-small: JetSpeed 5W 19* w/ Matrix Velox T 69 S OR :adams-small: Super LS 3H 19* w/ Kuro Kage Black 80 S
:mizuno-small: JPX919 Forged 4-PW w/ Modus3 105 S
:titelist-small: Vokey SM7 50/08F, 54/14F & 58/08M w/ Modus3 115 Wedge
:EVNROLL: ER1 34" w/ SuperStroke Fatso 2.0
MfleKCg.jpg Pro / 9dZCgaF.jpgH2NO Lite Cart Bag / :Clicgear: 3.0 / :918457628_PrecisionPro: NX7 Pro LRF

My reviews: MLA Putter // Titleist SM7 // PING i500 // PuttOUT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let the scoring begin!

 

May I ask how much for this set? Cost for the KBS upgrade?

 

I know a lot of people around that were also looking for a new set from PING, but where put down due to the higher price.

 

Those grips look familiar... I wonder who manufactures them for PING.

 

An 8 piece set is, I believe, $1350, but I don't think there is an upcharge for any shaft with the Ansers.

 

I believe PING's grips are made by Golf Pride, but I could be wrong.

Follow me on Twitter: @MattSaternus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got my first nine in with these irons yesterday (renegade Thanksgiving golf) and they are firmly in the bag. Hard to tell with the wind and cold, but I suspect I may have gained half a club due to slightly stronger ballflight. These are plenty forgiving and the turf interaction feels great to me - you can go down and get a nice divot, but it doesn't stick in and dig.

 

My father-in-law was also enamored with the clubs (he played out of my bag) and might be getting a set of his own.

Follow me on Twitter: @MattSaternus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Part 4: PING

Anser Wedges

My PING bag continues to take shape with the recent arrival of the Anser wedges. I went with a 50, 56 (bent to 55), 60 set up, all with specs to match my Anser irons (KBS Tour shafts and full cord grips).

 

The wedges arrived just in time for my Christmas trip to Dallas where I was able to sneak 2 more rounds into 2011. While two rounds didn't provide a ton of testing, here's what I know so far:

 

I love the feel. It's a nice, soft, muted feel with enough feedback to know where the ball hit the face. They're the perfect companion to the Anser irons in this regard.

 

A little big of forgiveness in a wedge is a very nice thing. If you look at my old wedges, you'll see that I have a slight tendency to favor the toe side. The Anser wedge has a tungsten weight in the sole that keeps the sweet spot centered and seems to provide a little extra forgiveness on the toe side. I hit a few shots that I know were a little toe-y, but they still covered the distance.

 

These are probably the best wedges I've ever used for anything from a half to a full swing. The trajectory is superb and there's plenty of spin to stop a ball, even on the "maintenance-free" (read "hard as h***") greens that we played. The soles are on the thick side with plenty of bounce (10 to 12 degrees), so I felt like I was able to go at the ball without fear of digging. I also loved the turf interaction on a good hard swing.

 

The one area where these wedges come up a bit short is in versatility. The thick sole and high bounce is great for full swings, but on little chips, off tight lies, or when you want to open up the face, it just gets in the way (the last picture shows a comparison between the 60* Anser and my 60* Scratch 8620). PING only offers one sole configuration per loft, so you are not able to choose a lower bounce or a thin sole model.

 

I can say with confidence that the 50 and 55 are in the bag to stay: they are probably my favorite gap and sand wedges ever. The 60 will require more testing to see if it can offer the versatility that I need, but I won't be able to determine that until the snow melts.

 

One other note: 2 more rounds with the Anser irons only confirms that shelving the MX-23's was the right choice. I absolutely love everything about them, and they nearly provided me with my first ace! Hopefully I will find that rare bird this season.

Anser Wedges (6).JPG

Anser Wedges (7).JPG

Anser Wedges (8).JPG

Anser Wedges (9).JPG

Anser Wedges (10).JPG

Anser Wedges (12).JPG

Anser Wedges (14).JPG

Follow me on Twitter: @MattSaternus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Part 5:

PING G20 Woods and Hybrid

 

 

Well, loyal readers, we have finally reached the conclusion. I recently received the final pieces of my PING bag: a G20 driver, G20 4W, and G20 20* hybrid. As you may recall from my fitting, all are set up with stock stiff shafts and full cord PING grips.

 

Since we are still coming out of winter here in Chicago, I haven't had a chance to get any of these outside, but I can tell you a little bit about what I've seen on the launch monitor.

 

The surprise favorite in this group is actually the G20 hybrid. I know that plenty of people hate the way it looks, but damned if it doesn't do what it's supposed to. It's not the longest hybrid out there, but it goes the same distance just about every time you swing it. To me, that's a much bigger deal. It's also not nearly as hook-prone as some would think. I have been fighting a hook lately, but the G20 tends to hold its line quite well compared to other hybrids.

 

The 4W and G20 driver have performed well on the monitor, though the real test will be getting them on grass. I've never hit a fairway wood consistently well, and I'm eager to see if the added loft will help this problem. The driver looks and feels great, and I will be very interested to see if the boost in loft (12* from 9.5*) adds to my carry distances the way I'm hoping it will.

 

Finally, I want to thank the people at PING and Zigfield Troy for the fitting, the clubs, and the education. I can't wait to get this whole set together on grass and Play My Best.

Ping Woods (1).JPG

Ping Woods (2).JPG

Ping Woods (4).JPG

Ping Woods (5).JPG

Ping Woods (6).JPG

Ping Woods (7).JPG

Ping Woods (8).JPG

Ping Woods (9).JPG

Ping Woods (10).JPG

Ping Woods (12).JPG

Ping Woods (13).JPG

Ping Woods (14).JPG

Ping Woods (15).JPG

Follow me on Twitter: @MattSaternus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • SPY VIP

The surprise favorite in this group is actually the G20 hybrid. I know that plenty of people hate the way it looks, but damned if it doesn't do what it's supposed to. It's not the longest hybrid out there, but it goes the same distance just about every time you swing it. To me, that's a much bigger deal. It's also not nearly as hook-prone as some would think. I have been fighting a hook lately, but the G20 tends to hold its line quite well compared to other hybrids.

 

 

I had a similar experience with the K15 hybrid. It certainly isn't the prettiest hybrid on the market, but it always went straight, and maintained distance very well on mis-hits.

MyGolfSpy is only major golf site that refuses advertising from large golf companies. With your support we can keep it that way. Donate Today
 


Subscribe to the MyGolfSpy Newsletter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get along with the rest of the G series but your spot on with the hybrids Matt. Hideous looking but dead straight ball flight with good, but not great, distance every time. I do have to be careful not to overcook the shot as that can lead to hooks but other then that I have no complaints. Well none other then I wish they could be stealthed out like the i20.

I laught at your claims to fight a zombie apocalypse when most of you can't stand up to a Spider

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...