Jump to content

Cut vs Callaway Ball Lab


PMookie
 Share

Recommended Posts

I’m thoroughly confused on the ratings now… Callaway Chrome Soft X LS received a 72, Cut just got an 84. Zero percent of the Callaway balls were flagged as “bad”, 11% of Cut’s were flagged as bad. There was a 3% change in Callaway’s True Price, and a 13% change in the Cut True Price.

I am completely lost as to why Cut received a 12 point higher rating….. Is it just because it’s a “cheap” ball to start with??? I am lost. A373F929-D4DC-469D-B626-7492DC80F0AF.jpeg.7bc30e6a81c7609e0a9068fd485c77f2.jpegDF41FA98-54F5-48F1-82BB-94ECA0149EF5.jpeg.014eeb2ebb7446dd86c086058eb272b0.jpegF5B43182-4ED6-42CD-8126-576FC73129B9.jpeg.e5cb42eb47a6305be8a442eab14ead1e.jpeg44736168-29D2-45A9-BFB4-5415EB788DBD.jpeg.452ce209a7010d73bd99d27a2b5d785a.jpegD443D0AF-F514-48B6-B5E9-08E30C664F82.jpeg.b883575a2a3a1cb8727ea68312a293c0.jpeg0F5FEA74-B2FF-4844-9D9C-966400B2D01D.jpeg.7ad5b2a1afff50c3c2e00ffa305f9ecd.jpeg

Driver: :cobra-small: King F9 Speedback, Xphlexxx Busa 2 Liquid, XX stiff, 45”

Fwy:  :callaway-small: Super Hybrid 17*, Aldila RIP Alpha 105 S, tipped 1”

Hybrid: :callaway-small: X2 Hot Pro, 20*, Graphite Design Tour AD-DI 105X

Irons: :honma:TR20 Tour P 4-10, :Nippon: Modus 130 stiff, +1”

Wedges: Vega VW-06 50*/54*/58*, Dynamic Gold S400

Putter:  :edel-golf-1: EAS 1.0

All clubs have :Arccos:  In the Winn Dri-Tac 2.0 Oversize grips

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah was wondering the same too, I found that the 73 was a little low on the rating, don't know the rating system they are using but I would assume that a 50$ ball that don't have any major defect this time would have gotten a rating around 80 or so. Still wouldn't game the ball since I tend to buy used ball and last batch of chrome was awful. 

Would love to see the rating system explained in detail to reach that number, maybe it's legit, maybe it's bias toward callaway, we can't know until we see the math in general behind the rating. Maybe the rating is related to the price, who knows. 

after further review on the stat, seems to be a compression consistency problem. it score fair for the chrome vs good for the cut.

image.png.34b528c122a59217f2571a7b5a0a4462.png

I used paintbrush quickly added line around 97.5 and 102.5 to see how many would fall within the parameter.

Chrome have 1 way off, 4 others that could be considered problematic.

Cut have 3 that could be considered problematic.

if you use the median, cut have 10-11 that touch the median, chrome have 13-14 that touch the median...

Looking at the 2 graph for compression, cut seems better by a small margin... For 3 pts compression, chrome look a little better than cut cause Cut DC got 2 way off out there. Just looking at those stats, both are quite similar, one is worth 50$for a dozen, other is 30$

 

image.png.12f01dcfc17cc8ffef4dafb05929847c.png

The more I think, the more the rating is including the price of the ball in the calculation. You would expect more from 50$ / dozen ball for sure

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, pouetvl said:

The more I think, the more the rating is including the price of the ball in the calculation. You would expect more from 50$ / dozen ball for sure

That would make sense, given the original calculation being "True Price" and how much you'd have to spend to get a good dozen. If the score is more of a 'value' score, then I'd like to see that more clearly articulated. That being said, I'd have to wonder about the CLEAR balls. If they were anything other than absolutely perfect, would they get absolutely slammed on their value score?

  • Love 2

Driver: :titelist-small: TSi3 with Tensei AV Raw White 65S
4-wood: :callaway-small: Mavrik Subzero (16.5*) with Aldila Rogue White 130 MSI X
2i: :srixon-small: ZX with SteelFiber i95cw Stiff
Wet/Soft: 3i-PW
:wilson_staff_small: D7 Forged, KBS Tour-V 110S
Hard/Fast: 4i-7i :srixon-small: ZX7, 8i-PW Z-Forged, Modus3 Tour 120 S

52*, 58* :cleveland-small: RTX ZipCore Modus3 Tour 115
Putter: :ping-small: Redwood Piper; :cleveland-small: HB Soft Premier 11s

Ball: :srixon-small: Z STAR/XV (but I'm not just going to leave a perfectly good ProV1 laying around...)
Bag: :ping-small: Hoofer (2018) in black/white/copper

Using :Arccos: to keep track of my shots
:SuperSpeed:

All clubs RH

Tested:
:wilson_staff_small: D7 Forged 3i-PW, KBS Tour-V 110S - Official Review

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to post this from the comments, directly from Tony.

"

Putting a total score on golf ball quality (or performance for that matter), is not a particularly natural thing to do…making it simple (out of 100) trickier still.

It simple for the casual observer, but if you’re serious about understanding how it comes together, it’s best to think of the elements (good ball% and the 3 consistency metrics) as separate things.

Good ball % makes up roughly 45% of the score. The rest is split almost evenly between the 3 consistency metrics. I say almost because compression is weighted a bit more because it’s effectively 2 separate metrics (consistency across the 3 points measured on each ball + consistency across the sample as a whole).

There is a bit of a curve (related to math, not price) as we want the best scores to be in the 90s.. Excellent ratings (the highest value) are theoretically possible, but highly unlikely we’ll see many. Excellent means 2 standard deviations above the database mean for a given metric – it’s an incredibly high standard.

So let’s talk about 2 specific examples.

First, the Cut DC. In terms of bad ball % it’s exactly average. Not awesome, not bad. Just average. Where math is concerned, most things fall within the average range.

Ratings for both compression and Weight each fell within the good range. (albeit just barely). It’s not excellent but it’s roughly a handful of points better than average.

Given that our system is dynamic (averages and subsequent ratings are updated each time a new ball is added), ratings for the Cut DC could drop a bit as balls are added. Likewise, the Pro V1 is just below the “good” threshold for Diameter, so it’s rating could improve as balls are added.

Looking at how the math comes together, the DC takes a hit for the 4 bad balls in the sample, but in terms of general consistency across the sample, it gets a boost for being better than the database average for compression and weight.

So what I would say is that the Cut DC balls are mostly alike, but you’re going to get a really bad ball once or twice per box.

Looking at it from the other side, a few questioned the ratings on the CSX LS because the good ball % was 97%. Basically, that means there was, individually, only a single disqualifying defect, but that metric doesn’t speak to consistency across the sample.

It got most of available good ball points, however, it was no better than average for 2 of our consistency metrics, and took a hit for falling into the “Fair” range (below average) for weight consistency..

With CSX LS, I’d say you’re not going to encounter many really bad ones, but the ‘good’ ones aren’t going to be a similar as some of balls we test.

  • Like 7

 :mizuno-small: ST180, 10.5, Kuro Kage Silver TINI Dual Core 60-S 

:callaway-small: Epic Flash Sub Zero, 15*, Kuro Kage Silver TINI Dual Core 60-S 

:755178188_TourEdge: CBX119 18* Hybrid, Projext X Evenflow Blue, 6.0

:ping-small: G710, 4-UW, Blue Dot, Nippon Modus 105-S

:honma: TW-W4, 56*, Nippon Modus 125

:mizuno-small: T20, 61*, Nippon Modus 125

🤮⛳   Flo-C

:titelist-small: Pro V1X, 2021 Model, #33

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Berg Ryman said:

I'm going to post this from the comments, directly from Tony.

"

Putting a total score on golf ball quality (or performance for that matter), is not a particularly natural thing to do…making it simple (out of 100) trickier still.

It simple for the casual observer, but if you’re serious about understanding how it comes together, it’s best to think of the elements (good ball% and the 3 consistency metrics) as separate things.

Good ball % makes up roughly 45% of the score. The rest is split almost evenly between the 3 consistency metrics. I say almost because compression is weighted a bit more because it’s effectively 2 separate metrics (consistency across the 3 points measured on each ball + consistency across the sample as a whole).

There is a bit of a curve (related to math, not price) as we want the best scores to be in the 90s.. Excellent ratings (the highest value) are theoretically possible, but highly unlikely we’ll see many. Excellent means 2 standard deviations above the database mean for a given metric – it’s an incredibly high standard.

So let’s talk about 2 specific examples.

First, the Cut DC. In terms of bad ball % it’s exactly average. Not awesome, not bad. Just average. Where math is concerned, most things fall within the average range.

Ratings for both compression and Weight each fell within the good range. (albeit just barely). It’s not excellent but it’s roughly a handful of points better than average.

Given that our system is dynamic (averages and subsequent ratings are updated each time a new ball is added), ratings for the Cut DC could drop a bit as balls are added. Likewise, the Pro V1 is just below the “good” threshold for Diameter, so it’s rating could improve as balls are added.

Looking at how the math comes together, the DC takes a hit for the 4 bad balls in the sample, but in terms of general consistency across the sample, it gets a boost for being better than the database average for compression and weight.

So what I would say is that the Cut DC balls are mostly alike, but you’re going to get a really bad ball once or twice per box.

Looking at it from the other side, a few questioned the ratings on the CSX LS because the good ball % was 97%. Basically, that means there was, individually, only a single disqualifying defect, but that metric doesn’t speak to consistency across the sample.

It got most of available good ball points, however, it was no better than average for 2 of our consistency metrics, and took a hit for falling into the “Fair” range (below average) for weight consistency..

With CSX LS, I’d say you’re not going to encounter many really bad ones, but the ‘good’ ones aren’t going to be a similar as some of balls we test.

Thanks! That helps. The sad part is if clarification has to continually come after the fact, a better description at the outset could help.

4 hours ago, pouetvl said:

yeah was wondering the same too, I found that the 73 was a little low on the rating, don't know the rating system they are using but I would assume that a 50$ ball that don't have any major defect this time would have gotten a rating around 80 or so. Still wouldn't game the ball since I tend to buy used ball and last batch of chrome was awful. 

Would love to see the rating system explained in detail to reach that number, maybe it's legit, maybe it's bias toward callaway, we can't know until we see the math in general behind the rating. Maybe the rating is related to the price, who knows. 

after further review on the stat, seems to be a compression consistency problem. it score fair for the chrome vs good for the cut.

image.png.34b528c122a59217f2571a7b5a0a4462.png

I used paintbrush quickly added line around 97.5 and 102.5 to see how many would fall within the parameter.

Chrome have 1 way off, 4 others that could be considered problematic.

Cut have 3 that could be considered problematic.

if you use the median, cut have 10-11 that touch the median, chrome have 13-14 that touch the median...

Looking at the 2 graph for compression, cut seems better by a small margin... For 3 pts compression, chrome look a little better than cut cause Cut DC got 2 way off out there. Just looking at those stats, both are quite similar, one is worth 50$for a dozen, other is 30$

 

image.png.12f01dcfc17cc8ffef4dafb05929847c.png

The more I think, the more the rating is including the price of the ball in the calculation. You would expect more from 50$ / dozen ball for sure

Awesome analysis, and seems to be dead-on what Tony says in Berg’s post. Thanks!!!

  • Like 1

Driver: :cobra-small: King F9 Speedback, Xphlexxx Busa 2 Liquid, XX stiff, 45”

Fwy:  :callaway-small: Super Hybrid 17*, Aldila RIP Alpha 105 S, tipped 1”

Hybrid: :callaway-small: X2 Hot Pro, 20*, Graphite Design Tour AD-DI 105X

Irons: :honma:TR20 Tour P 4-10, :Nippon: Modus 130 stiff, +1”

Wedges: Vega VW-06 50*/54*/58*, Dynamic Gold S400

Putter:  :edel-golf-1: EAS 1.0

All clubs have :Arccos:  In the Winn Dri-Tac 2.0 Oversize grips

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that make sense, I had a similar conclusion when I spent more time comparing the two ball, not sure if I want more consistent ball with really few bad one or less consistent with no bad ball or so. Cause as a user, I have no way to single out those bad ball. Of course I'm gonna end up playing something else than those two balls but eventually it might come down to those stats.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, pouetvl said:

that make sense, I had a similar conclusion when I spent more time comparing the two ball, not sure if I want more consistent ball with really few bad one or less consistent with no bad ball or so. Cause as a user, I have no way to single out those bad ball. Of course I'm gonna end up playing something else than those two balls but eventually it might come down to those stats.

 

A quandary for sure!

Driver: :cobra-small: King F9 Speedback, Xphlexxx Busa 2 Liquid, XX stiff, 45”

Fwy:  :callaway-small: Super Hybrid 17*, Aldila RIP Alpha 105 S, tipped 1”

Hybrid: :callaway-small: X2 Hot Pro, 20*, Graphite Design Tour AD-DI 105X

Irons: :honma:TR20 Tour P 4-10, :Nippon: Modus 130 stiff, +1”

Wedges: Vega VW-06 50*/54*/58*, Dynamic Gold S400

Putter:  :edel-golf-1: EAS 1.0

All clubs have :Arccos:  In the Winn Dri-Tac 2.0 Oversize grips

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Berg Ryman said:

I'm going to post this from the comments, directly from Tony.

"

Putting a total score on golf ball quality (or performance for that matter), is not a particularly natural thing to do…making it simple (out of 100) trickier still.

It simple for the casual observer, but if you’re serious about understanding how it comes together, it’s best to think of the elements (good ball% and the 3 consistency metrics) as separate things.

Good ball % makes up roughly 45% of the score. The rest is split almost evenly between the 3 consistency metrics. I say almost because compression is weighted a bit more because it’s effectively 2 separate metrics (consistency across the 3 points measured on each ball + consistency across the sample as a whole).

There is a bit of a curve (related to math, not price) as we want the best scores to be in the 90s.. Excellent ratings (the highest value) are theoretically possible, but highly unlikely we’ll see many. Excellent means 2 standard deviations above the database mean for a given metric – it’s an incredibly high standard.

So let’s talk about 2 specific examples.

First, the Cut DC. In terms of bad ball % it’s exactly average. Not awesome, not bad. Just average. Where math is concerned, most things fall within the average range.

Ratings for both compression and Weight each fell within the good range. (albeit just barely). It’s not excellent but it’s roughly a handful of points better than average.

Given that our system is dynamic (averages and subsequent ratings are updated each time a new ball is added), ratings for the Cut DC could drop a bit as balls are added. Likewise, the Pro V1 is just below the “good” threshold for Diameter, so it’s rating could improve as balls are added.

Looking at how the math comes together, the DC takes a hit for the 4 bad balls in the sample, but in terms of general consistency across the sample, it gets a boost for being better than the database average for compression and weight.

So what I would say is that the Cut DC balls are mostly alike, but you’re going to get a really bad ball once or twice per box.

Looking at it from the other side, a few questioned the ratings on the CSX LS because the good ball % was 97%. Basically, that means there was, individually, only a single disqualifying defect, but that metric doesn’t speak to consistency across the sample.

It got most of available good ball points, however, it was no better than average for 2 of our consistency metrics, and took a hit for falling into the “Fair” range (below average) for weight consistency..

With CSX LS, I’d say you’re not going to encounter many really bad ones, but the ‘good’ ones aren’t going to be a similar as some of balls we test.

Thanks for posting that because I was confused too

  • Like 1

:cobra-small: King F7+ UST Mamiya Chrome Elements 6F4 Shaft

:cobra-small: King F7 3W UST Mamiya Chrome Elements 7F4 Shaft

:cobra-small: King F7 5W UST Mamiya Chrome Elements 7F4 Shaft

:cobra-small: King F7 4 Hybrid Graphite Designs Tour AD-HY 95 Shaft

:cobra-small: King F7 5-PW UST Mamiya Recoil 95 Shafts

:cobra-small: King PuR Wedges 50*,54*,58* UST Mamiya Recoil 95 Shafts

:odyssey-small: Metal X Milled #7 with SuperStroke 3.0 grip

Arccos Generation 1 Sensors on all clubs

Snell MTB



Twitter: @timldotson
Instagram: timldotson
Facebook: TimDotson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good discussion here - but it makes me wonder. Are name brand loyalists (TM, Titleist, etc.) interested in trying some of the DTC balls after these Ball Lab reports? Snell was top last year but is looking fairly even with Vice but now Cut DC is making a push.

I think DTC brands have a place in the market but the extra $15-$20 for name brand premium balls seem to actually be getting you a better product. How much better is tough to quantify but the Ball Lab is a step in the right direction . Thanks MGS for Ball Lab!

  • Like 2

 :taylormade-small: M6 12* Oban Kiyoshi Purple 65g stiff

:titelist-small: TS2 16.5* HL Oban Kiyoshi Purple 75g stiff

:ping-small:  G410 Hybrid 19* Tour stiff 

:ping-small: i210 KBS tour stiff 4-GW

:cleveland-small: 54* RTX Zipcore

:ping-small: 58* glide 3.0

:taylormade-small:  TP Black Copper Juno 34in

Oncore elixr or Snell MTBx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After seeing both reviews I am a bit confused as well, but my confusion ends when I go to purchase as I wont be ordering either.  I would rather spend the extra money and get a better quality more consistent product.  Until one of the less expensive brands rates similar to Titleist etc. I am not interested.  

I rarely use more than two balls a round, so my thinking is for an extra $2 why would I not get a better ball?  You have a driver that might cost $500, a $50 plus greens fee and tons of money spent on other equipment, lessons, range balls etc. why get chintzy with the ball when it's the least expensive thing you pay for?  

Hell, people will ****** about a $4 ball and spend $12 on a cocktail in the bar.  I also just bought a bunch of Pro V logo overruns, great ball for the same price as the Callaway.  

  • Like 1
  • Love 1

Ping G400

Ping G410 3,5,7

Titleist T300

Vokey 54, 58M

Odyssey #1 black
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, TBS said:

Good discussion here - but it makes me wonder. Are name brand loyalists (TM, Titleist, etc.) interested in trying some of the DTC balls after these Ball Lab reports? Snell was top last year but is looking fairly even with Vice but now Cut DC is making a push.

I think DTC brands have a place in the market but the extra $15-$20 for name brand premium balls seem to actually be getting you a better product. How much better is tough to quantify but the Ball Lab is a step in the right direction . Thanks MGS for Ball Lab!

I will say this that Cut, as well as Vice make some decent balls with the price point of cut being much better.  The biggest issue i see with these balls is they lack the durability of the Titleist ProV1, Prov1x and -ProV1x.  That being said buying a Cut Blue at $19.99 a dozen or a ProV1 at $49.99 a dozen do you really expect the same durability?  If you are looking for a pretty good golf ball at an affordable price then Cut is a great option, the cover is pretty soft and will groove up but i have not seen a significant drop off in distance and or feel.  If all things were equal meaning price points, i would play a ProV1 series ball all day, but reality is they are not equal.  

  • Like 2

Michael Miami, FL
9.3 USGA index
Cobra Amp Cell D Driver stiff shaft 9.5 degree
Callaway 13 degree Diablo 3 wood stiff shaft
Tour Edge Exotics #3 19 degree rescue

E21 Rescue #4 23 degree rescue
TaylorMade M2 6 iron Stiff true temper shaft(4 iron)

Adams XTD A Tour Irons with S300 True Temper shafts 5- GW
Wilson Staff SW 56 degree
GEL Ruby 33 in cut down with Washington Capitals oversize grip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, TBS said:

Good discussion here - but it makes me wonder. Are name brand loyalists (TM, Titleist, etc.) interested in trying some of the DTC balls after these Ball Lab reports? Snell was top last year but is looking fairly even with Vice but now Cut DC is making a push.

I think DTC brands have a place in the market but the extra $15-$20 for name brand premium balls seem to actually be getting you a better product. How much better is tough to quantify but the Ball Lab is a step in the right direction . Thanks MGS for Ball Lab!

I've played the Vice ball's several times... My biggest think is the shipping or ordering online.  I mean I can't be the only one to just pick up a dozen balls at the course or DSG just becuase you wanted to try something out for a few rounds... I just did that with the CS x LS.  And got to say, I was very impressed, might be a little too low spin for me.  When I played with them I was having more trouble getting the ball to stop once the greens firmed up. 

  • Like 2

:cobra-small:  Speedzone White 10.5*

:callaway-small:Mavrik 4W - 16.5*

:titelist-small: 818 H1 19* Hybrid 😍

:Sub70: 939X 22* Hybrid

:Sub70: 699 Pro Black 5-AW

:cleveland-small: RTX Zipcore 54* and 58*

:taylormade-small: Spider Tour Black on Black on Black

Ball: Whatever I find in the woods 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, twyatt700 said:

I've played the Vice ball's several times... My biggest think is the shipping or ordering online.  I mean I can't be the only one to just pick up a dozen balls at the course or DSG just becuase you wanted to try something out for a few rounds... I just did that with the CS x LS.  And got to say, I was very impressed, might be a little too low spin for me.  When I played with them I was having more trouble getting the ball to stop once the greens firmed up. 

This may not have anything to do with the quality of the ball, but from a marketing perspective, that added friction could definitely make someone less likely to even try the product, let alone drop in excess of $100 for a multi-dozen 'value pack.' I appreciate the balls like OnCore and Cut that will send you a single sleeve to try for like $3 shipping, but there's definitely still friction compared to impulse buying a ball from a green grass shop.

(And to argue the other side, if a single dozen of Vice is $34 and a single dozen of a green grass ball like Titleist or Cally is $45-50, that's a pretty significant premium to pay for the convenience.)

  • Like 2

Driver: :titelist-small: TSi3 with Tensei AV Raw White 65S
4-wood: :callaway-small: Mavrik Subzero (16.5*) with Aldila Rogue White 130 MSI X
2i: :srixon-small: ZX with SteelFiber i95cw Stiff
Wet/Soft: 3i-PW
:wilson_staff_small: D7 Forged, KBS Tour-V 110S
Hard/Fast: 4i-7i :srixon-small: ZX7, 8i-PW Z-Forged, Modus3 Tour 120 S

52*, 58* :cleveland-small: RTX ZipCore Modus3 Tour 115
Putter: :ping-small: Redwood Piper; :cleveland-small: HB Soft Premier 11s

Ball: :srixon-small: Z STAR/XV (but I'm not just going to leave a perfectly good ProV1 laying around...)
Bag: :ping-small: Hoofer (2018) in black/white/copper

Using :Arccos: to keep track of my shots
:SuperSpeed:

All clubs RH

Tested:
:wilson_staff_small: D7 Forged 3i-PW, KBS Tour-V 110S - Official Review

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Ball Lab has spoken.....my fav ball is the Maxfli Tour CG, scoring 91 and costs 2 dozen for $55 or $60 keeps them in my bag.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Driver: PXG 0211 w/Evenflo Riptide CB Regular shaft 

Fairways:  Cobra King F8 3-4W(16*) & 5-6W(20*) w/Mitsubishi ck Blue regular shaft 

Hybrid: Cobra F8 3 Hybrid(19*) w/Recoil ES regular shaft 

Irons: Wilson D7 5-PW w/Recoil 460 Regular graphite shafts 

Wedges: Cleveland RTX Zipcore(50*/54*/58*) w/True Temper Spinner Wedge steel shaft  

Putter: 33" Evnroll ER2 w/Evnroll Gravity Grip 

Bag: Vice cart bag(Black).  

Pushcart:  Caddytek 3.0 from Costco

Ball: Maxfli Tour CG & Titleist Pro V1x.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fortunately I loose very few balls. It's plain old worth to me to play the Pro VIx.  I do the by three get one special every year at New Years and am done with it.  Since this year's ball is a new iteration I waited a bit (still had two dozen left over from last year) and did the virtual ball fitting which said...... wait for it - Pro VIx - so I have 4 dozen of the new ones in the queue - still have a dozen and a half of the old ones, too.

 

I will skimp on lots of stuff but not the golf ball that I play.  

  • Like 3
  • Love 1

Taylor Made Sim2  10.5 (Opened 1 click) Ventus Blue 5  R flex

Ping G410 5-9 wood  Alta 65 R flex

Wilson D7 forged 6-GW -  Mamiya recoil 460 R flex

Edison Wedges 54 and 59 KBS Tour Graphite 80's

EVNRoll ER 5

Titleist Pro VIx optic yellow with revkev stamped on them

Tour Exotics 3 wood is in the bag because we are allowed 14 clubs.  It's a great club for pulling balls out of the water or from bushes - you never want to put your hand into anything in Florida unless you are absolutely certain that it's safe.  There are rare wind conditions when I might hit it off the tee on a few holes that I play.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried the Cut balls and didn't care for the feel. I hate paying $50 for balls, but really feel like PV1 are the best for my game. Thus, I am the ultimate ball-hawk. I think if you necessarily care, and just want a new, clean ball, for a cheaper price, Cut could be for you.

As an aside, I really like their hats!

  • Like 1

10.5 Epic Flash

TM 3 Wood

Titleist 20* 5 Wood

Apex Pro Irons

58 TM and 60 Callaway degree wedges

Odyssey Sabertooth Putter

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, revkev said:

Fortunately I loose very few balls. It's plain old worth to me to play the Pro VIx.  I do the by three get one special every year at New Years and am done with it.  Since this year's ball is a new iteration I waited a bit (still had two dozen left over from last year) and did the virtual ball fitting which said...... wait for it - Pro VIx - so I have 4 dozen of the new ones in the queue - still have a dozen and a half of the old ones, too.

 

I will skimp on lots of stuff but not the golf ball that I play.  

Ditto!

Driver: :cobra-small: King F9 Speedback, Xphlexxx Busa 2 Liquid, XX stiff, 45”

Fwy:  :callaway-small: Super Hybrid 17*, Aldila RIP Alpha 105 S, tipped 1”

Hybrid: :callaway-small: X2 Hot Pro, 20*, Graphite Design Tour AD-DI 105X

Irons: :honma:TR20 Tour P 4-10, :Nippon: Modus 130 stiff, +1”

Wedges: Vega VW-06 50*/54*/58*, Dynamic Gold S400

Putter:  :edel-golf-1: EAS 1.0

All clubs have :Arccos:  In the Winn Dri-Tac 2.0 Oversize grips

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, greggarner said:

This may not have anything to do with the quality of the ball, but from a marketing perspective, that added friction could definitely make someone less likely to even try the product, let alone drop in excess of $100 for a multi-dozen 'value pack.' I appreciate the balls like OnCore and Cut that will send you a single sleeve to try for like $3 shipping, but there's definitely still friction compared to impulse buying a ball from a green grass shop.

(And to argue the other side, if a single dozen of Vice is $34 and a single dozen of a green grass ball like Titleist or Cally is $45-50, that's a pretty significant premium to pay for the convenience.)

Lets be clear... not a lot of thought goes into my spending habits.... its a real issue 😂

  • Haha 5

:cobra-small:  Speedzone White 10.5*

:callaway-small:Mavrik 4W - 16.5*

:titelist-small: 818 H1 19* Hybrid 😍

:Sub70: 939X 22* Hybrid

:Sub70: 699 Pro Black 5-AW

:cleveland-small: RTX Zipcore 54* and 58*

:taylormade-small: Spider Tour Black on Black on Black

Ball: Whatever I find in the woods 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, twyatt700 said:

Lets be clear... not a lot of thought goes into my spending habits.... its a real issue 😂

HA! I'm the exact opposite. I'll put something in my shopping cart and then just sit on it for weeks/months. I had figured out how to get a new set of irons for net-out-of-pocket $85 and I still needed a month to pull the trigger. My wife gets mad at me about it because I'll just keep bringing it up. "I dunno. Do you think I should buy them?" "Oh my lord, Greg, buy the #@$^# clubs. I told you that 2 weeks ago."

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Driver: :titelist-small: TSi3 with Tensei AV Raw White 65S
4-wood: :callaway-small: Mavrik Subzero (16.5*) with Aldila Rogue White 130 MSI X
2i: :srixon-small: ZX with SteelFiber i95cw Stiff
Wet/Soft: 3i-PW
:wilson_staff_small: D7 Forged, KBS Tour-V 110S
Hard/Fast: 4i-7i :srixon-small: ZX7, 8i-PW Z-Forged, Modus3 Tour 120 S

52*, 58* :cleveland-small: RTX ZipCore Modus3 Tour 115
Putter: :ping-small: Redwood Piper; :cleveland-small: HB Soft Premier 11s

Ball: :srixon-small: Z STAR/XV (but I'm not just going to leave a perfectly good ProV1 laying around...)
Bag: :ping-small: Hoofer (2018) in black/white/copper

Using :Arccos: to keep track of my shots
:SuperSpeed:

All clubs RH

Tested:
:wilson_staff_small: D7 Forged 3i-PW, KBS Tour-V 110S - Official Review

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, greggarner said:

HA! I'm the exact opposite. I'll put something in my shopping cart and then just sit on it for weeks/months. I had figured out how to get a new set of irons for net-out-of-pocket $85 and I still needed a month to pull the trigger. My wife gets mad at me about it because I'll just keep bringing it up. "I dunno. Do you think I should buy them?" "Oh my lord, Greg, buy the #@$^# clubs. I told you that 2 weeks ago."

HAHAHA, yep literally the opposite... I make the impulse decision then spend two weeks researching to validate my decision 😂  I'm guess you;re going to retire before me lol

  • Haha 3

:cobra-small:  Speedzone White 10.5*

:callaway-small:Mavrik 4W - 16.5*

:titelist-small: 818 H1 19* Hybrid 😍

:Sub70: 939X 22* Hybrid

:Sub70: 699 Pro Black 5-AW

:cleveland-small: RTX Zipcore 54* and 58*

:taylormade-small: Spider Tour Black on Black on Black

Ball: Whatever I find in the woods 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...