mizzoulefty11 Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 I was looking at some of my golf books at home and came across the Pelz Bibles I had purchased many years ago. These books were published over 10 years ago and I was curious if the golfing community still felt the Pelz books had stood the test of time. Has the Pelz philosophy been pushed to the sideline by guys like Dave Stockton or Stan Utley? Thanks. Jason What's in the bag. Driver - Adams Speedline Fast 10 3 Wood - Adams Insight XTD A3 Boxer Hybrid 2 - Adams Pro Gold Hybrid 3 - Adams a7 Irons 4-PW - Adams a7 GW - Adams Idea Pro SW and LW - Maxfli C3 Putter - YES Golf Marilyn mallett Ball - TBD - Holding auditions Eyewear - Sundog Focus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Saternus Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 I wouldn't say so. I think Pelz's methods have as much credibility today as they did then, and as much as Stockton or Pelz. Pelz is not the hot commodity of the moment like Stockton, but that doesn't mean his methods are good. I personally disagree with many of his thoughts on putting, but I do enjoy his short game book immensely, particularly all the drills and the "short game handicap" test. Follow me on Twitter: @MattSaternus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoverRick Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 I just wrote a post on another thread, 3 or 4 wedges, that is classic Pelz. Using different wedges and the clock method to control distances. I did not credit him but I do agree with him that the more you miss the green the more wedges you need. G430LST 10.5° on T P T POWER 18 Hi Driver G430MAX 3w on T P T POWER 18 Hi Fairway G425 3H on T P T POWER 18 Hi Hybrid G425 4H on TGH 80S i525 5-U on TGI 90S SM8 54 & 60 on Wedge DF2.1 on White ProV1 Precision Pro NX7 Pro All Iron grips are BestGrips Micro-Perforated Mid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.