heavy_hitter

Business analytics. The methodology and collection of the data is flawed. A person that reads MGS is not purchasing an off the rack Driver and shaft unless fitted for it.

LMAO.... THP? I haven't logged in to THP for years. I have no agenda. Just the testing is flawed. I actually enjoy the insights on a lot of what is published. That doesn't mean that your testing, especially the putter testing, isn't flawed because it is. Flawed is completely accurate. If you kept it to only the break down of High, Moderate, and Low Swing Speeds only, while still flawed, would be more common to agree with your assessments. However, naming one driver as the best is flawed as is your strokes gained category.

One post or a thousand doesn't matter. Flawed research because your data can't be replicated. You could take another 100 testers and get completely different results, that is why it is flawed. If you took a mechanical arm, the data can be replicated. However, the entire premise of coming up with a #1 is without a doubt flawed if you look at statistical and science research data. The biggest flaw in any test you have is putters. Honestly, that research is a complete joke.

The best of's are 100% flawed. There is no rhyme or reason to any of them.