CorentinV

Hi Leon, Thank you for your message. If we lose a sensor, we'll be not able to track shot on the specific club we lost it. The others will still work.

Tee to Green: Elevate Your Game with the Garmin S70 The world of golf technology is constantly evolving, and the Garmin S70 is a shining example of how advanced gadgets can enhance your performance on the course. After extensively using this watch, I’ve discovered its many strengths and a few weaknesses. Here’s a look at how the Garmin S70 can elevate your game from tee to green. Improving Tee Shot Accuracy and Distance While I can't claim the watch directly enhances my precision and distance, it certainly helps me find the fairway more often and avoid penalties. In fact, the watch provides crucial course information and simulates potential tee shot distances right on your wrist. When I’m about to tee off, I can estimate where my ball might land and choose the most reasonable club accordingly to avoid OOB or water hazards for. As a golfer with a 15-18 HCP, this has been a game-changer. Example: This weekend, on a particularly tricky dogleg par-4 at my home course, the Garmin S70 advised me to opt for a 3-wood instead of my driver as I had improved my average driving distance from 235y to 255y on average recently and usually tried to cut the corner with my driver. This strategic decision helped me land safely on the fairway, avoiding going too far and play a recovery shot. Assisting with Approach Shots and Greenside Play When it comes to approach shots and greenside play, the Garmin S70 is incredibly helpful. It accurately detects bunkers and provides precise distances to different parts of the green. The PinPointer featurecombined with the virtual caddie is particularly beneficial, helping me attack the green more effectively. In addition, the Garmin S70’s "PlaysLike" functionality, which accounts for elevation changes and weather conditions, is invaluable for making better decisions on the course. This feature helps in choosing the right club and adjusting for uphill or downhill shots, as well as wind conditions. Example: On the par 5 of Golf Orléans, the watch adjusted the yardage to consider a downhill approach and tailwind, suggesting my 7i instead of my classic 5w for 220y. This helped me land just after the river and nicely roll down the hill to end on the green. I would have come up too long, in the bush, without the adjustment. Improvements in Ball-Striking Consistency & Performance While it’s hard to measure the Garmin S70’s direct impact on my ball-striking consistency, I can confidently say that using the Garmin S70 has made me swing with more assurance. Knowing accurate distances and course information allows me to focus more on my performance and less on the potential risks. This is particularly evident in my short game, where precise distance measurements are crucial. Trusting the data from the Garmin S70 has led to more confident swings and better results around the green (50y-100y shots) to leave the ball within a few feet for easier putt. These better choices and confidence help me to take more “greens in regulation” resulting in more pars vs bogeys and the chance to add some birdies (not even eagle) on the score card. I can definitively say that I was able to lower my score by 3/5 shots using the Garmin S70 (or Arccos tracker) moving from a 20HCP (before tracking my shots) to a 16 HCP. Comparison with Other Devices When comparing the Garmin S70 with other devices like Arccos, there are both pros and cons: Having all the information you need on your wrist feels a huge plus. The combination of the S70 and CT10 sensors functions similarly to the Arccos system. The distance measurements and club recommendations are nearly identical, differing by only a yard or two, which is negligible for a golfer of my level. Garmin has no lack in features embedded in the watch vs Arccos. Arccos has a slight edge in design and usability, offering a satellite view of the course that helps identify nearby trees and obstacles. Unfortunately, this feature is missing in the Garmin S70, which can lead to unexpected challenges on the course. The Garmin Golf App is however the real pain vs Arccos. I’ll dedicate a complete post about it but after using Arccos App, it feels like a real regression to use the Garmin one… Usability is quite horrible, finding data is not easy… the user experience is not good at all. Garmin is not displaying your Gained Stroked but a comparison VS a similar HCP. Recommendation for Golfers Would I recommend the Garmin S70 to golfers looking to enhance their performance on the course? Absolutely. Especially for those who enjoy playing on various courses throughout the season, the Garmin S70 provides the confidence to tackle unfamiliar layouts and avoid major pitfalls. The device’s seamless integration into my routine, without interfering with my game, makes it an excellent choice. Final Thoughts The Garmin S70 precise GPS capabilities, advanced features, and ease of use make it a valuable tool for improving your game. Like Arccos system, the Garmin has been a transformative addition to my golfing arsenal but directly on my wrist. It has improved my accuracy off the tee, enhanced my approach shots and greenside play, and boosted my confidence across various aspects of my game. While practice and skill remain essential, the Garmin S70 provides the data and insights needed to make smarter decisions and play better golf. If you’re serious about elevating your game, the Garmin S70 is a worthy investment, but it’s important to weigh its pros and cons against other leading systems like Arccos.

Pretty annoying situation @revkev and unfortunately you are not alone… We have rain here in Quebec City for 2 days now so I had to cancel my tee time this morning but I decided to go to my winter indoor golf club to play 18-holes on Trackman. If my golf was pretty ok, I almost lost the CT10 sensors on my 8i, 7i and Driver. I had to screw them back in between each shot... At the time I didn't pay too much attention but reading your post, I tell myself that they could have fallen without realizing it... I’m playing tomorrow morning 6am sharp, I’ll be careful. BTW, I used to play with Arccos sensors, I already had to tighten them sometimes but nothing similar as today with the CT10. To be continued…

First Hypothesis: Does the Garmin S70 Body Battery Score Affect Golf Round Performance? This post will only cover Body Battery VS Golf Performance and expectations about that. This article is only my first hypothesis and not a definitive conclusion at all. I'll propose new analysis during the nexts weeks and more intensive tests of the watch. So, here is my initial answer after a golfing weekend in Bromont, QC, Canada. To introduce this analyse, here is a bit of context: My week was marked by three distinct golf rounds: 1. Golf 9Chatel (9 holes) - Time: End of the day after work - Body Battery: 17/100 - Course: Simple, short, and flat - Played alone 2. Chateau Bromont (18 holes) - Time: Early morning after a 2.5-hour drive - Body Battery: 39/100 - Course: Complex and hilly with challenging greens - Played with my beginner wife (helping her throughout) 3. Royal Bromont (18 holes) - Time: Early morning after a good night's rest - Body Battery: 60/100 - Course: Long with many water hazards, narrow fairways, and fast, deceptive greens - Played on foot with an experienced local player Body Battery vs. Course Difficulty Based solely on my Body Battery, my performance ranking should have been: 1. Royal Bromont 2. Chateau Bromont 3. Golf 9Chatel However, considering the difficulty of the courses, the ranking would be completely opposite. Body Battery vs. Performance Insights After playing these three courses, it was the second scenario that turned out to reflect the weekend reality. I performed better on the 9-hole course (+4) with a very low Body Battery than on the other two courses (+18 / +20). Several factors could explain this discrepancy: - Course Difficulty: The Course Rating/Slope between 9Chatel (32/110), Chateau Bromont (68/122), and Royal Bromont (70.4/130) are significantly different. - Course Length: The distances varied: 9Chatel (2508y), Chateau Bromont (5778y), and Royal Bromont (6145y). - Weather Conditions: Bromont had a temperature of 28ºC over the weekend compared to 22ºC at 9Chatel on Wednesday. Fatigue and lack of clarity were more noticeable on the course I walked at Royal Bromont. Body Battery vs. Sport Condition Mental Focus: Golf demands a high level of concentration and mental clarity. Performing better on a weekday evening after a stressful day, compared to a weekend round, might be explained by the need to unwind after work versus the pressure to excel on more prestigious courses. Playing relaxed, for fun, as an average player might yield better results than trying to perform at a high level with inconsistent technique. Physical Endurance: While the impact of the Body Battery on other aspects is less clear, there is a definite correlation between endurance and the Body Battery score. Although I played well on the 9-hole course on Wednesday, I would not have been able to maintain performance over an 18-hole round that evening. Consistency: For an 18 handicap golfer, consistency is challenging to evaluate, as it is the most variable factor at this level, whether the Body Battery is at 80/100 or 5/100. However, it is evident that when fatigued, finding a rhythm and being competitive is more difficult. Conclusion Based on this weekend's experience, my preliminary answer to the hypothesis that there is a correlation between the Body Battery score and golf performance is "NO, the Body Battery score might not be a definitive predictor of golf performance". However, this remains to be confirmed with future golf rounds because it stand to reason that maintaining a high Body Battery score through good sleep, stress management, and balanced physical activity should contribute to better overall performance on the golf course.

I did it with the App to compare with my previous tracking system. But you're right, the app is clunky.

May 29th, 2024: First In-Condition Test of the Garmin S70 + CT10 Sensors Earning a +43 pts during the night, I woke up with a Body Battery score of 56/100 which isn’t the most promising start to the day, but I soldiered on, working from behind my computer all morning. I squeezed in a quick 20min practice session at the range during lunch, which provided a much-needed break from the screen. It didn't really affect my BB score: -2 pts Later, I managed to book a 6:05 PM tee time at Golf 9Chatel. Thanks to traffic, I arrived just in time and started my round without any warm-up, with my BB score plummeting to 18/100. Not the most ideal conditions for a great round of golf, but here we go! The first three holes were rough, with three bogeys in a row. However, things took a turn for the better, and I found my groove. Birdie, Par, Birdie, Par, Par! I couldn’t believe it—I was sitting at +1 after eight holes, on track for my best nine-hole round ever. Then came the ninth hole. My mental game took a hit as I realized I was on the verge of my best score. Despite a solid 253-yard drive into the right rough, I botched my chip over the bunker, missed again, shirt chip and then three-putts for a triple bogey. I finished with a score of 40—my best yet, but still, the disappointment lingered. Reflecting on the round, I ended with a BB score of 7/100 (-11 pts). I didn't feel that my BB affected so mush my game however, I can’t help but wonder: with a better Body Battery, would I have been able to keep my cool and at least finish with a Par or Bogey? The mental pressure got the best of me this time. I'm finishing my day, writing this article with a 5/100 score... it's time to go to bed Despite the ups and downs, the Garmin S70 watch and CT10 sensors performed admirably. They provided accurate distances, helped me understand the course layout, and recorded my shots effectively. The data collected was mostly accurate, though some gimme putts didn’t get recorded. However, I found the post-round editing on the Garmin Golf app less intuitive compared to Arccos or Golfshot. I’ll delve deeper into this in a future post. Overall, it was a great first experience even if my mental game let me down at the end. Onward and upward!

I'm not sure it was 100% accurate as only wore it for a day. Yesterday my Body Battery drop from 100 to 14 after a day of work, 1.5h at the gym and 2h playing video games. This morning I got back to 50 only.

I can't join you this year as I joined too lately the forum, but count me in for next year! Have fun and enjoy these beautiful courses guys. ️

Hey MGS Community, I finally got my hands on the Garmin S70 and CT10 sensors, and I'm here to share my unboxing and setup experience. Here are my initial thoughts and impressions: Packaging: The package arrived well-protected in a bubble wrap envelope. Both the watch and sensor boxes were in perfect condition, with no apparent damage. Each box contains the equipment and user guides, presented in a simple yet effective manner. Sensor Installation Tool: Garmin includes a small black tool to help attach the sensors to the clubs easily. It's not a game-changer, but it saves your fingers from the strain of screwing in multiple sensors. Watch Aesthetics: The watch face is stunning and modern, with a clear display and excellent contrast, making it easy to read. The 42mm model fits perfectly on the wrist, feeling light and almost unnoticeable during wear. The rear sensor has been refined over the years, now slim and non-intrusive. Watch Band Quality: The plastic band of the watch feels somewhat low-quality. It has a very "sport watch" feel that struggles to compete with the premium feel of an Apple Watch. My Garmin Forerunner from five years ago had a better sport band too which feels more comfortable vs the S70. In addition, my first impression made me think that you can't change the band but after some research you can do it which is a good point. I'm afraid the white band will become dirty and lose its shine. However, the frame of the watch will remain white which limits the choice of band color from an aesthetic point of view. Sensor Quality: The plastic quality of the sensors isn't exceptional compared to Arccos sensors. They attach reasonably well but don't fit clubs perfectly. In addition there is no "face blocking", the sensor holds well but you can screw it endlessly which feels a bit weird to me. To finish, they're a bit too high and not wide enough to match the grip edges, even though I use undersized grips. No Dedicated Putter Sensor: The lack of a dedicated putter sensor affects the fitting experience (compare with Arccos sensors). The Garmin sensor feels quite ugly on my Scotty. This is one of the biggest issue for me. I hope it will not affect my perception while putting. Easy Watch Setup: Setting up the watch is straightforward but requires downloading several apps for a complete experience: Garmin Connect, Garmin IQ, and Garmin Golf. It will permit you to change your display, settings and add apps (like Spotify). The initial setup process is user-friendly, with clear instructions provided in the user guides. However, if you plan to go "all in" in the settings as soon as you receive the watch, you could spend quite a lot of time figuring out how to navigate between the 3 Garmin's apps and the watch. Pairing Instructions: At the opposite of the watch setup, the pairing instructions are somewhat cumbersome, with certain aspects feeling a bit uncertain. And as expected after reading the user guide, the pairing process was indeed tedious and complicated. This was exacerbated by the fact that I have 5 wedges (43º, 48º, 52º, 56º, and 60º), which the app does not account for. I had to pair my 60º as a lob wedge, 56º as a sand wedge, 52º as a gap wedge, 48º as a pitching wedge, and 43º as a 9-iron... (here starts the problem). After many minutes of tinkering, I managed to rename and re-categorize the clubs correctly via the app, but this required re-pairing everything. It was an unpleasant experience unfortunately. Watch Update Required: Not a big deal but the watch needs to be updated to complete the setup. Make sure your watch is fully charged and connected to Wi-Fi for a smooth update process. Initial Impressions: Despite some initial hurdles, the Garmin S70 and CT10 sensors offer a promising start with impressive features that I'll detailed on another post. The unboxing was exciting and like opening a Birthday / Christmas's gift, it's always a great experience. The watch's display is crisp and easy to read, and it fits comfortably on the wrist. The sensor installation tool is a handy addition, making it easier to attach the sensors to the clubs. However, the sensors are a bit disappointing vs Arccos sensors and the pairing process can be tedious, especially if you have a large number of clubs to pair. This could have an important weight in my decision of keeping the sensors in my bag after the review. We'll see... I'm now excited to test out the Garmin S70 + the CT10 sensors on the course and dig into all features like the combination of health and activity tracking, along with detailed golf performance data. FYI, my Body Battery is currently 68/100 after a computer work day. Unfortunately, the weather forecast for the week is not good here in Quebec but I already have 2 golf rounds schedule for Saturday (Golf Château Bromont) and Sunday (Golf Royal Bromont). I'll use the next days as preparation days going to the gym and working on my Body Battery score. I'll keep you updated!

Got it, I'll try to understand the benefit having all clubs with sensors vs only 3 (including the putter). Stay tuned

Hi @FallenSaber, Thank you for your message. I'll try to sort something answering your request. Could you be more specific about what you want to know? Is it regarding the performance of 3 vs 14-sensors? Thank you

Good morning everyone! Hope you all had a fantastic weekend. Just wanted to drop a quick recap of my golf activities: We clinched the 5th place in the team of 4 scramble tournament with a solid -5. Super proud of how the team performed! Played a couple of rounds on my own too; scored an 87 on Saturday and a 90 on Sunday. Some ups and downs but overall, a great learning experience. Exciting news—I’ve been selected to test the Garmin S70 along with the CT10 sensors! You can check out the announcement and follow my updates on the testing process here: Garmin S70 + CT10 Sensors Test. Looking forward to an exciting few weeks ahead with the new Garmin gear. Have a great week ahead, everyone!

Hi MGS Community! First off, I thrilled to have the opportunity to participate as a tester, thanks to MyGolfSpy and Garmin! I can't wait to dive in and share my experiences and data with all of you during this process. Introduction : Personal Background My name is Corentin, I’m 29. I currently play out of Québec City, having moved here from France in September 2022. Working from home as a Sales Manager in the Tech Industry and hitting the gym on non-golfing days, I strive for a balanced lifestyle that includes significant dedication to golf. I'm married, no children, and I cherish the flexibility to explore various golf courses as a nomad golfer. My wife joined me on this golf journey early May this year. Golfing Profile I'm a casual golfer with a competitive mindset. I started golfing seriously over a year ago and I'm dedicated to continuously improving my skills and understanding of the game. I'm currently an 18 handicap golfer and have been diligently working with a coach for the past few months to achieve my end-of-season goal of reaching a 10/12 handicap. I’m always seeking to get better and find a way to improve myself which make this testing opportunity a perfect match for me. My golf strengths are my short game and shots off the tee. My weakness is my accuracy with approach shots, I’m quite struggling with a push hook on some shots. My Swing tempo is pretty agressive with an average driver swing speed around 105 mph. My average ball flight is a draw with a high flight trajectory. Product Testing Strategy In the past, I’ve used Garmin products for running and, despite switching to an Apple Watch due to some issues with the Garmin's health metrics and Bluetooth stability making the phone connection quite laborious, I’ve always regarded Garmin as a top-tier tech brand in the sports industry. For this test, I’ve chosen the 42mm watch due to my stature (5.6 ft) and thinner wrists. I plan to rigorously test the S70 and CT10 sensors against my current setup with Arccos and Golfshot, looking for seamless integration and at least equivalent if not superior functionality. I intend to provide detailed data collected by the Garmin S70. I will evaluate everything from user interface and data accuracy to the practical benefits of the health tracking features. With a golf tour coming up with a friend around Montreal and Québec, where we’ll play about 10 rounds in 13 days, it’s the perfect scenario to test the Garmin S70 watch and Approach CT10 sensors. The review will include data from regular rounds, practice sessions, and from the mentioned golf tour. Expectations and Excitement I am particularly excited to see how the Garmin products can track not just my shots but also my health metrics like Body Battery, HRV, and Sleep Score. These features could provide profound insights into how physical and mental readiness impact my game. I’m intrigued to see how improvements in my Body Battery might correlate with performance on the course, potentially leading to better scores and more efficient practice sessions. I’ll also add a focus on how a golf session, on course or at the practice range, is affecting my Body Battery. Criteria for Retention For the Garmin S70 watch and CT10 sensors to earn a permanent spot in my bag, they must not only match but exceed the functionalities of my current devices. They need to offer comprehensive, actionable insights that genuinely enhance my strategic approach to golf, backed by reliable and user-friendly technology. The daily usage will be also an important criteria to replace my Apple Watch. The connection with my phone and the notifications should work perfectly to avoid any annoyance. First Impressions (7 out of 10) Packaging and Presentation The Garmin S70 and CT10 sensors arrived in a well-protected bubble wrap envelope, ensuring the boxes were in perfect condition with no apparent damage. The packaging is simple but effective, presenting the contents in a neat and organized manner. Each box includes the equipment and user guides, which are straightforward and easy to understand. Unboxing Opening the box, the first thing that stands out is the sleek, modern design of the Garmin S70 watch. The CT10 sensors are well-packaged, and Garmin provides a small black tool to help attach the sensors to the clubs easily. Setup Setting up the watch is relatively straightforward but requires downloading several apps (-1 pt) for a complete experience: Garmin Connect, Garmin IQ, and Garmin Golf. The initial setup process is user-friendly, with clear instructions provided in the user guides. Sensor Installation and Pairing Attaching the sensors to the clubs is easy with the provided tool. Each sensor should be securely screwed into the grip. The pairing instructions, however, are somewhat cumbersome (-1 pt). The process is tedious, especially if you have a large number of clubs to pair. For instance, I have five wedges (43º, 48º, 52º, 56º, and 60º), which the app does not account for. This required renaming and re-categorizing each club accurately, which took several attempts (-1 pt). Initial Impressions Despite some initial setup hurdles and no specific putter sensor, the Garmin S70 and CT10 sensors offer a promising start with promising features. Technological Advances Garmin claims several technological advances with the S70 and CT10, including enhanced health metrics like Body Battery, sleep tracking, and heart rate variability (HRV). The CT10 sensors provide comprehensive tracking of your golf game, offering detailed statistics and performance insights. These features aim to help golfers improve not only their game but also their overall health and fitness. Aesthetics (8 out of 10) General Shape / Size / Fit The Garmin S70 watch has a sleek, modern design. The 42mm model fits perfectly on my wrist, feeling light and comfortable (+1 extra pt). The display is crisp and clear, with excellent contrast that makes it easy to read in various lighting conditions. The rear sensor is slim and non-intrusive, adding to the overall comfort. Customization Customization options are somewhat limited but effective (-1 pt). The watch face can be customized via the Garmin IQ app, allowing you to choose from various designs and layouts. The CT10 sensors do not offer much in the way of customization (as expected) however their height and not wide enough design are quite an issue as they de interfere with your clubs' aesthetics (see comparison vs Arccos putter sensor above) (-1 pt). Durability or Build Quality The build quality of the watch is excellent, with a robust design that feels premium. The plastic band, however, feels a bit low-quality compared to other premium watches (-0.5 pt), such as the Apple Watch. The CT10 sensors are made from a durable plastic, but their quality does not feel as premium as the Arccos sensors. The sensors fit reasonably well but do not match the grips perfectly (-0.5 pt) Storage Cases The packaging does not include dedicated storage cases for the watch or sensors, but the provided boxes are sturdy enough for safe storage when not in use. Long-term Durability Prediction Given Garmin's reputation for high-quality, durable products, I expect the S70 watch and CT10 sensors to hold up well over time. The watch's design and materials suggest it will withstand regular use, while the sensors, despite their slightly less premium feel, should also prove durable with proper care. I still have concerns about the band aging but Garmin offers the possibility of changing it (around 50-75 USD) Conclusion (7.5 out of 10) Overall, the Garmin S70 and CT10 sensors make a strong first impression. The setup process, while somewhat cumbersome, is manageable, and the initial performance of the watch and sensors is promising. With robust features and a sleek design, the S70 and CT10 have the potential to significantly enhance my golf game and overall health tracking. Find more details and pictures about my unboxing experience in a detailed post here.

Hey everyone, Just wanted to share some exciting news in the Morning Thread (even if it’s more an evening news ) I've just received my new SM10 wedges! Just in time as I'm gearing up for a team of 4 scramble tournament tomorrow. I can't wait to see how these beauties perform on the course and hopefully help us snag some good scores. It's going to be a great test of their capabilities right out of the gate. Wish us luck!

Transitioning from traditional lessons to an online platform can definitely offer flexibility and potentially cost savings. However, it does require self-motivation and discipline to get the most out of it. Since you're used to structured lessons with a PGA pro, make sure any online service you choose offers a clear progression plan and the ability to communicate effectively with your online coach. I've a really positive experience with TheGolfRoom Everywhere, particularly with my coach Alex Shattuck. What stands out with their approach is the flexibility; there's no long-term commitment required—you can try it out just for a month to see if it suits your needs. Alex provides tailored feedback through the CoachNow app, where you can upload videos of your swings and receive detailed analyses and drills to work on. It's NOT a pre-recorded reply lesson, it's 100% custom for you! The guidance is practical, and Alex is excellent at ensuring you fully grasp and integrate each lesson before moving on. It's very much a personalized learning experience that adapts to your pace. If you're interested, I can definitely refer you to Alex.