jstone
-
Posts
5 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
FAQ
Tests
Classifieds
Store
Group Buys
Posts posted by jstone
-
-
Yes, sorry was holding in Orlando and lost sight of this. I would still like to joinI sent him the link just waiting for him to respond. Also still missing [mention=68200]jstone[/mention]if he is still interested
Sent from my SM-G981V using Tapatalk
- GolfSpy_APH and GolfSpy_BNG
-
2
-
Interested. Let me know when & where to sign up.
- GolfSpy_APH and fixyurdivot
-
2
-
Maxfli balls rule. And they're "whiter" than Titleist. That's one thing about top dog Titleist that irks me to no end, their white is very weak & almost muted compared to the rest of the market. Possibly one of the darkest whites out there. Maxfli all day any day.
- GolfSpy TCB and fozcycle
-
2
-
I received my 49° Edison wedge about a month ago. Came from the Cleveland RTX-3 48° and was looking for a more consistent distance with the gap wedge. The Cleveland was good but on mishits I lost too much distance. I went to the range with both the Cleveland and Edison and they were about the same distance on full shots, although I felt like the Edison was sending it further on mishits (which is what I was after). Also, the Cleveland would balloon like crazy and the Edison produced a much a lower trajectory (another trait I was after). Overall, I am enjoying the club but still need more on the course hits to get a better feeling for it.
Shot Scope vs Arccos
in Golf Technology
Posted
Shot Scope. Main reason is there is no subscription fee. I just bought the X5 watch, tagging is far better than previous generations but it still has some flaws. Some features of the watch are buried in the UI, which can be frustrating since you don't want to be messing with the watch while playing. The developers do listen to the community and continually push updates to fix bugs. Overall, I'm happy with shot scope but I've never used Arccos for comparison.