Jump to content

pozzit

 
  • Content Count

    357
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

635 Excellent

About pozzit

  • Rank
     
  • Birthday 10/16/1986

Contact Methods

  • Twitter
    pzzit2
  • Instagram
    timpozzi

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Iowa
  • Handicap:
    5.9

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I believe the R-motion he is referring to is not the MLM that uses a sensor attached to your phone. The R-Motion is a small sensor you attach to the shaft that tries to calculate this information. I tried out R-Motion on mobile app about a year ago and through it gave me some good information it was very cumbersome. I was hoping to couple it with my Optishot 2 since R-motion displays face angle, path and attack angle. which is something Optishot is a bit questionable or non existent.
  2. This is a great opportunity and apparently the have enough stock to do this thats great. Good luck to the testers. I have some "grass" carpet that i use on occasion but I just dont spend the time when im home to practice i need to force myself to get to the course and focus. Good Luck all
  3. Wow a whole season that would be tough for me. There was plenty of course management but I feel like it was more strategy of planning for the course ahead of time to decide the clubs. I agree that having all 14 is less mentally taxing especially knowing that you have the ability to take 10-30 yards off any club if need be. I may keep it in my practice rotation once a month or so to keep honing those skills its like playing with my old set of blades just an extra layer of challenge to practice. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
  4. O yea the course is hugely important playing the back nine would have changed my selection for sure. @Buffly it is defiantly a game centered around course planning and partial shots it really forces you to dial distance control.
  5. Tuesday I got out to play 18 and played ok but as I was finishing i had some time and played an extra 9 and only took 4 clubs just to play quicker. Since they aerated the greens the day before i left the putter in the car. So my question to all of you would be what 4 clubs (not including putter) would you choose and why? My choices were (playing an old set of MP-33s so distances were at least a club short): Driver: Got to put the big dog in. I actually went back and forth between this or 4 wood to stay a little safe in the fairway and would have shifted the 8 to a 7 but the course is pretty open and i was striking it pretty well. 5 iron: The main reason I chose this were the fact that 1 of the par 3s is 182yrds downhill which lined up vary nicely with this club. 8 irons: I have noticed especially on the front nine i end up just inside 150yrds so having the 8 as a solid 145 club was preferred Pitching Wedge: I needed a wedge and this wedge is 48* it was a good middle ground for around the green End result I actually beat my first round 9 of a 43 and shot 41 while putting with a 5i..... are 14 clubs to many choices?
  6. Those are some interesting view points II dont know that I would have deduced those same points but I agree with 2 & 3, if you mean biased to specific geometry. If you mean biased in the fact that Maltby has high numbers I disagree, If a brand has a formula for what you think is best for the player why not maximize it?
  7. I completely agree but unless you decide you want to dive deep into how MPF is determined that is not clear to most users. Obviously there are other factors that MPF ignores such as sole width, blade length, shaft and others that play a big role as well but it just gets more and more complicated. Yes Yes and Yes. Part of my Golf Physics deep dive is to have some sort of understanding of the main factors and how they truly impact the golfer. I think this would go a long way in also helping MGS get irons in TrueGolfFit
  8. Alright well i guess the quote was officially 100+ points would be the point where it would be noticeable. http://ralphmaltby.com/forum/question/noticeability-of-mpf/ I think what would be best would be rather then a higher is more best scale it should be a matrix of hitting principles. Lets say if your a toe striker vs need to get the ball up or your a digger. this would be a way to help give golfers a better idea to relate it instead of simply a specific score.
  9. pozzit

    TXG 100K Giveaway

    For all who care to participate the Candidates have been posted on Youtube. Good luck to all those guys sees like we have a wide variety of personalities
  10. I am undecided on MPF. I really like the idea of being able to compare clubs based on the fundamental geometry but think there are some flaws with MPF making assumptions of what makes the best parameters are. The fundamentals are around helping golfers get the ball airborne like @Hook DeLoft mentions. Center of Mass is everything to MPF. Having a long blade with more weight on the toe side and low COG is optimal. Since the hosel is heavy and is not the club face it pulls a lot of weight away from the center of the face (where most believe is the center of mass) Use it as a basic guideline but comparing one of the most visually SGI irons the Wilson Launchpad irons are 518 MPF and MP-33 blade is 419 MPF both fall into the Better Players Only Category. Ralph Maltby also mentioned most wouldn't be able to distinguish a 100 MPF point difference.
  11. I actually really like graphs like this and noticed you van add in the new JPX line as well for comparison. Its interesting see that the JPX Tour & MP MCC are so close and the Forged and MP HMB are near identical. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
  12. If you have other HMB you could just measure it. Blade Length is from the toe to the center line of the shaft. A quick Googling found on mizuno site they give a graphic comparing the sizes of the MP-20 line https://mizunogolf.com/us/golf-clubs/mp-series/mp-20/ The HMB 6i comes out to 3.169in so indistinguishable (0.008") from TS-1 Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
  13. I know this is a bit late in the game but I found a cool tool to make simple free apps so I made a Speed Stick App if anyone wants to try and use it Speed Stick Tracker
  14. I know this is a little late for for tracking the SuperSpeed Tester Forum but I just came across this program that lets you make basic free apps from Google Docs. So I build myself and the community one. Swing Speed Tracker App (Should work on Android and Apple but not in App stores due to design of app) Feel free to test it out if you want. We may run into a limit depending on how many people join. Also if you want more information about this app service let me know.
  15. Thats awesome glad you picked it up. You should add a few pictures. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...