invee123

You read my mind, twilight rates w/ cart only ended up being $55 a person and I was still able to get the whole 18 in!

Date 04/16/2023 Course Name Colorado National GC Gross Score 85 Course Handicap 22 Gross Strokes over/under par 13 Net Score to Par -9 Net Score 63 Net Birdies or better 12 Longest Drive 311 Finally got a hold of the driver this week and playing out of the fairway makes golf much easier

How are you guys copying the table to post scores? I have a round from yesterday that I would like to post! *Edit: Figured it out and posted thanks to @richk9holes

Today's round gave me an idea of how it feels to play most par-4 shots out of the fairway vs in the trees or dropping from a slice OB. I played my best round yet (+13) and had the stats to back it up. Really really need to work on 60 yards and in shots as I'm definitely losing strokes not being able to get up and down. Played at Colorado National in Erie, CO and it was my first time playing. This course is LONG. Played from the gold tees coming in at ~6800 yards (I usually play in the ~6100 range with my buddies) but something with the driver was clicking as I was carrying most of my drives 280 yards into the fairway. Also only lost 1 ball in the whole round which is also a personal best on 18. I really feel like if I can dial the up and down shots and leave myself 15 feet or closer for birdie putts, I could see that score dropping even more! 8 Fairways, 7 Greens, 33 putts, +13 *Also, I need to start taking pictures at the rounds I play, some of these courses are crazy pretty.

I'm stoked to keep an eye on this thread (my wallet may not be though)! I've seen a decent amount of coverage on their in-depth club fittings and customization and I am excited to see what the spies come up with versus their current set!

Updated this post with the second day of playing the same 9. I will happily accept some solicited advice on how to confidently turn my pull into a push draw (helpful videos always welcome)

Played the front-9 at Heather Ridge GC in Aurora, CO. I felt pretty good going into it but oh man was I wrong... You would have thought the fairways were made of water with the way I was smacking balls into lakes! On the bright side, I didn't hit a single double bogey - only 3 triples, 3 singles, and 3 pars LOL. With the stats I had you would think it was a much better 9 but sometimes that's the way golf goes. Playing the same 9 again this afternoon so I'll update this post with the same front-9 score again and see how different they are. First front-9 4 Fairways, 4 Greens, 21 putts, +12 ------------------------------------------------------------ Well that didn't go much better... I have been feeling way to uncomfortable over the ball lately. I am working on going I>O with my swing path while I'm figuring out the draw my miss is becoming a pull-draw and resulting in going way left, so that's is creating a doubt when I line up to the ball. Second front-9 3 Fairways, 2 Greens, 20 putts, +12

I was looking to see if I could get a Broke 90 badge and a hole-in-one badge if possible. Thanks!

Introduction Allow me to introduce myself and my history with the game of golf. My name is Grant Marsh, and I reside in the beautiful state of Colorado. I enjoy playing at a multitude of courses including many municipal courses as well as premium offerings. However, my favorite golf course is the Fossil Trace GC in Golden, CO. Interestingly, it is also where I landed my first and only hole in one, making it an especially memorable course for me. Although I started playing golf as recently as September 2021, my goal is to achieve a single digit handicap by the end of this season. Currently, I am a casual golfer who occasionally takes on an 18-hole course alone to see how low I can score. Nevertheless, I prefer playing with friends of varying skill levels and enjoying a nice day in the sun. Here are some general statistics from the rounds of golf that I play to give readers an idea of what an average round looks like for me: I hit about 43% of fairways and 33% of greens, and my average putt count is 2.06 per hole. Unfortunately, my approach shots are my weakest point on the course, which makes par 3s some of the worst holes I play. When it comes to scoring, I struggle with major blow-up holes. While 79% of the holes I play are bogey or better, if I'm not achieving that mark, it's rare that I manage to save a double. Overall, the biggest challenge in my golf game is maintaining consistency while staying confident with my equipment. That's why I'm excited to test whether the OnCore X2 ball can help me achieve my goals. I intend to provide a relatable experience for fellow mid-handicappers looking to move up by putting the OnCore X2 ball through rigorous testing. Using my Swing Caddie SC300 launch monitor, I will gather data to confirm or deny the claims by OnCore regarding low spin and high distance claims off the tee, claims regarding high spin around greens, and comparing the ball's performance against big players like Pro V1x, Chrome Soft X, TP5x, and Vice Pro Plus. I will provide subjective (sound and feel) and objective (wear, spin, ball speed, and distance) metrics to compare and contrast the balls. Ultimately, my goal is to determine whether the OnCore X2 ball can match the TP5x's performance, my current ball, while providing a better feel around the greens. My ideal ball should sound slightly clicky off the face and feel firm yet springy at high swing speeds. With a price of $50 a dozen, I expect the OnCore X2 ball to perform comparably to other balls in the same category regarding spin and ball speed. Unboxing and First Impressions: 9/10 As I eagerly arrived home from a long day of work, I was met with a package that contained a set of 3 one-dozen boxes of OnCore Vero X2 golf balls. My excitement was instense as I tore open the cardboard and cut through the tape to get to these golf balls. Before diving into the full review, I conducted some first impression tests, comparing them to my current gamers, including the TP5x and Pro V1x balls. Upon initial inspection, I must admit that the yellow packaging left me with mixed feelings. While the text and marketing materials conveyed the ball's impressive technology and performance-enhancing features, the brighter yellow colors and the fonts gave the impression that the ball was geared towards a senior audience with lower swing speeds and a need for lower compression numbers, similar to a marketing campaign from XXIO. However, my parents raised me to never judge a book by it's cover, so I remained optimistic to see what performance figures these balls could produce. One of my biggest gripes with the ball was the alignment aid. The almost misplaced X on the line proved to be slightly distracting and was a topic of discussion among my fellow testers. However, I acknowledge that this is more of an aesthetic issue and does not affect the ball's performance. One element of the ball that impressed me was the comforting pitch it produced when dropped on a solid surface, flooring, or when hit at the simulator. As a mid-handicapper, I place a lot of importance on the sound of a golf ball, and the OnCore Vero X2 did not disappoint in that regard. After playing with the OnCore Vero X2, I must say that my initial impressions did not do the ball justice. While I had reservations about the ball's aesthetics, its performance on the golf course made up for it. The ball's advanced design and unique features allowed for a seamless and responsive experience, inspiring confidence and trust in its abilities. Overall, my first impressions of the OnCore Vero X2 were mixed, but mostly positive. While there were some aesthetic issues with the packaging and alignment aid, the ball's impressive performance and advanced design make it a solid contender for any golf enthusiast looking to take their game to the next level. I look forward to getting a lot more rounds and simulator sessions in with these balls to really determine their overall performance and how those metric compare to their peers that I currently play. For this section, I am happy to see that OnCore provided for the testers and I am intrigued by the design decisions the company has made, so I give it a 9 out of 10. Aesthetics: 6/10 As I had alluded to in my introduction, yellow just is not my color - it doesn’t seem to go well with my eyes. In terms of sound and feel, the ball exudes a satisfying firmness that surpasses the TP5x and aligns closely with the Pro V1x. One aspect of the ball's aesthetics that has drawn criticism from my fellow golfers is the alignment line. Having played numerous rounds with this ball, I can confidently say that I'm not particularly fond of the large, curvy X right in the middle of the line. However, it's not all negative when it comes to the aesthetics. Compared to more traditional-looking Titleist, Vice, or TaylorMade golf balls, I found it much easier to identify my ball from a distance due to its unique appearance. OnCore deserves credit for deviating from the standard black fonts commonly seen on golf balls. Well done, guys. Taking everything into consideration, I would rate the overall aesthetics of this golf ball a 6 out of 10. While there is room for improvement, it certainly stands out in terms of visual distinctiveness. The Numbers: 17/20 (50* Wedge numbers) Initially, I didn't pay close attention to the numbers during the early stages of testing, as my main focus was on gauging the ball's feel off the club face and its performance in the air. However, as I continued testing, I couldn't help but notice that the OnCore X2 didn't seem to promote my draw as much as the Titleist Pro V1x (one of my current go-to balls). I was intrigued to dig deeper and uncover the reasons behind this observation. Let's take a closer look at the numbers obtained during the latter part of my testing. When it came to my wedge shots with the OnCore X2 and my other two primary balls, I observed a relatively lower launch trajectory and the highest ball speed among the competitors (keep in mind that these numbers are based on my 11-handicap level). I didn't encounter any significant sidespin issues with clubs below the pitching wedge, mainly because I don't attempt to shape shots with these shorter clubs. However, it wasn't surprising to see slightly lower spin numbers, as I did experience some rollout on the greens during rounds in Colorado, where every RPM can make a difference. (7-iron numbers) Moving on to my 7-iron numbers with the OnCore X2 and the other balls, I started to notice a significant challenge I faced with my mid-to-long iron play: launch angle. Personally, I struggle to achieve the desired loft with any club, and I couldn't justify sacrificing that aspect for a slight gain in ball speed (which I didn't observe with the OnCore X2 during my 7-iron testing). This is where the Pro V1x truly excelled for me, as it consistently produced the spin and launch angle that I was looking for. Overall, OnCore's claims about reduced sidespin and increased distance held true in my testing. I firmly believe that the numbers on this ball will greatly benefit players aiming for straight shots with high club head speeds. However, it doesn't tick all the boxes for me in terms of workability, which is why I would give it a rating of 17 out of 20. On The Course: 14/20 During my time on the course, the performance of the Vero X2 matched my expectations based on its compression numbers and my personal playstyle. Off the tee, I experienced some of my best and most accurate drives, with impressive straightness. When it came to iron shots, I noticed decent launch angles and flight characteristics similar to its competitors. The ball allowed for shot shaping, and I didn't encounter any significant inconsistencies in distance control. Moving on to putting, despite my personal dislike for the alignment aid, I found the Vero X2 to be consistently reliable in terms of contact, feel, and roll. Unlike the peculiar sound described in Rick Shiels' video about PXG's new golf ball, I'm pleased to report that the Vero X2 did not exhibit any unusual quirks on the greens. As someone who doesn't compete at a highly competitive level, my overall impression of the Vero X2 is that it performs well both in comparison to its competitors and on its own merits. It offers slightly lower-than-expected spin but delivers greater-than-expected distances in real-world situations. If this type of ball aligns with your preferences, you'll find comfort in choosing the X2 over the Pro V1x and TP5x when you head out to your local course. However, my personal preference for a golf ball differ at the moment, which is why I would rate the Vero X2 a 14 out of 20. The Good, The Bad, The Inbetween: 16/20 Throughout my extensive rounds with the OnCore Vero X2 ball across various courses, ranging from country clubs to municipal courses in different locations like Florida and Colorado, I've had a wide range of experiences, with my worst round being +29 and my best at +6. After all those rounds, I can confidently affirm, without a hint of uncertainty, that the OnCore Vero X2 ball, when played by an 11-handicap golfer in their mid-twenties like myself, is just alright. Now, I know that might sound like a vague response, but bear with me as I elaborate. The ball excelled in certain areas such as ball speed, minimal sidespin off the tee, and noticeable aesthetics. However, it didn't meet all my expectations for a premium golf ball, especially in the very areas where it showcased strengths. As a young and capable golfer who strives for shot shaping and consistent misses, I couldn't quite find the level of comfort and performance I was seeking with the Vero X2. One crucial aspect that sets OnCore apart from companies like TaylorMade and Titleist is the palpable sense of a smaller, focused vision within the OnCore brand. In the past, I've encountered customer support issues with Titleist and Callaway, including long wait times and underwhelming service. In contrast, OnCore impressed me when the test balls arrived late by promptly sending all testers an additional dozen balls as a gesture of goodwill. Now, readers might perceive this as an attempt to earn favorable reviews, but I genuinely believe they would extend the same level of care to anyone purchasing their balls. Overall, considering these various aspects, I would rate the miscellaneous category a 16 out of 20 for the team at OnCore. Play it or Trade it?: 10/20 The ball was good, don’t get me wrong. I enjoyed my time playing with it and I think I was really starting to come around to some of its design quirks and its differing flight characteristics. However, all good things must come to an end. This is by far the hardest section for me to rate, because I really am in between on if this golf ball is the best or worst option for me when compared to the field. However, I will be deciding to Trade it for the TaylorMade TP5x. While this decision is not permanent, I cherish the increased launch of the TP5x over the ball speed gains of the OnCore Vero X2. Also, I have recently became a fan of taylormade products and I prefer the aesthetic and pricing deals that have been going on for their golf balls. My biggest deterrent towards the X2 is the price, as I would be much more apt to buy them if they were priced with the Vice balls or even just undercutting the Titleist, Callaway, and Taylormades of the world. Despite my decision to trade the OnCore Vero X2, I want to emphasize that I harbor no negative feelings toward my time spent playing with these balls. Therefore, I rate this section an even 10 out of 20. TL;DR Conclusion The OnCore Vero X2 is in fact a golf ball. Even more importantly, it is a very good golf ball for people who swing the club fast and want the ball to go as fast and straight as possible. It is a great ball for people who want a Pro V1x competitor but don’t want to fork over $55 a dozen and deal with a HUGE golf brand for customer service needs. It is not the best ball for those who seek the best that shot shaping has to offer, or are searching for the absolute most consistent flight from their ball. There is a reason that Titleist holds the crown for the best golf ball. I hope that those of you readers out there reading my review will give the OnCore Vero X2 a chance. The company has been great and I really do believe there is a place in the market for their product. If you find yourself drawn to the observations I alluded to in my review - go out and get a dozen and let me know how you play! **Also, I didn’t get the chance to compare these with the Vice Pro Plus very much, so expect some follow-up testing on those balls as I am one of those average golfers who actually has to buy their gear unlike the guys who just played the PGA Championship. Final Score: 72 (EVEN PAR) /100

Maybe had one of the most impactful days for my golf game yesterday. I've swung a golf club in some capacity (whether it be the range or playing a round) every day for the last 2 weeks and my body was starting to feel it. Yesterday I had a recovery day where I focused on stretching and enjoying the sunny and 80* Colorado weather. Today, I feel loose and ready to go out and probably swing a club again every day for the next two weeks! Moral of the story is taking a relaxation day has been largely beneficial to me and I couldn't help but recommend it to all of the other golf junkies out there.

My brother got fit for a set of 0311 Gen5 irons and a driver not too long ago and is a huge fan! Definitely takes a minute to get the yardages dialed since they are a little stronger lofted and more forgiving. I've gotten the change to swing those alongside my p770s and they ROCKET off the face!

It's honestly amazing. One of the nicest courses I've played and expecially when you can get winter/twilight rates ($70 with cart and balls) it's a tough deal to beat

It would be nice to have an iOS app, I wonder what funding goes into MGS and how much they would spend to have one developed after their new website remodel?

I would've been all fired up after that it's already hard enough playing in that humid of an environment. The round that I played yesterday the tractors were going around punching the fairways and they were turning on sprinklers as we went through. That was fine but all of that noise gets a little annoying on a premium course.

It's crazy how little they're bothered by it, much less so than the geese that are also there. I play with some below-average golfers that struggle to get their driver in the air and I worried for the deer every time we tee'd off and they were infront of us. Luckily those ended up being the holes they hit well on... must be a pressure situation thing.

Didn't play too well at Arrowhead GC in Littleton, Co. Course handicap for me was a 21 but definitely found myself with a couple blow-up holes. Ended up shooting a 99 (Had a knee knocker to break 100 on 18) and walked away happy that I got to play in sunny and 75. Did get to see a ton of deer roaming the fairways though! There was also the issue of the bunkers probably playing as ground under repair with no rakes and plenty of deer residue/footprints (they are going to re-sand them this week). I had 6 sand shots in total that had no shot of getting close to the pin, and 2 of those sand shots resulted in a skulled ball OB. 4 fairways, 2 greens, 35 putts, +29

I play pretty traditional with taking my glove off around the greens - I tend to wear a tighter glove so it feels more like an extension of my hand. Sometimes I'll even take it off for a pitch/chip shot around the green. However, if I leave my glove on for a putt you better believe it's going to be both rushed and end up nowhere near the hole...

I read a response off of that one yesterday but couldn't find it again today - thanks!

I agree with the skill of the LIV guys that are playing but no one really expected a performance from one of them a the level Brooks it at... and those who did were probably expecting for that performance from DJ or Smith. But I guess he did just win LIV Orlando so he's coming in with some swagger

Watching this Sam Bennett might be the most entertaining story other than Brooks performance. The top-2 leaders both not being on the tour should open a lot of eyes

I enjoy getting to the course about an hour early and hitting about 30 balls at the range, some wedges around the greens, and rolling some putts. The issue is when I'm carpooling with the slowest foursome on the planet (both on and off the course) and I can barely get a bucket after checking in let alone hit a ball... Things like diet, sleep, and what I bring with me aren't a huge focus but I do want to get an orange ball stick to warm up with - seems pretty nice to have.

I play pretty traditional with taking my glove off around the greens - I tend to wear a tighter glove so it feels more like an extension of my hand. Sometimes I'll even take it off for a pitch/chip shot around the green. However, if I leave my glove on for a putt you better believe it's going to be both rushed and end up nowhere near the hole... Realized I read the topic completely wrong LOL. A glove usually lasts me about 10-15 rounds. I could be waiting longer but I don't currently buy the most expensive gloves and prefer the feel of a glove with 2 rounds MUCH more than a glove with 20

Ton of wedge work yesterday working on 10-30 yard approach shots. I feel like after watching that Tiger and Scotty video posted by TM youtube channel I've got something to actually work on.

Played 9 at the local executive (par 31) and shot a 37. Really need to work on getting back on GIR as I've got my distance down but I just can't seem to figure out alignment. Rookie stuff 2/3 Fairways, 2/9 greens, 18 putts, 37 (+6)

Has anyone used the Callaway Pre-Owned site? I'd been getting a ton of ads and picked up a few clubs (2 jaws wedges, a UW and a rogue 3w) all in like-new condition and they've all come in the original packaging!! Absolutely killer deals for those who want modern equipment at crazy discounts and with warranties.