GolfSpy TCB Posted September 19, 2022 Share Posted September 19, 2022 https://mygolfspy.com/2022-most-wanted-wedge/ Whether it has been several years since you replaced your wedges, or you are just curious to see how your recently purchased wedges stack up - check out the link above for the MYGOLFSPY Most Wanted Wedge testing 2022! GolfSpy_APH 1 Quote Titleist TSR3 9* (A2 setting) Driver - Graphite Design Tour AD UB-5 R1 Titleist TSR2+ 3 Wood - Graphite Design Tour AD UB-5 R1 Srixon ZX 5W Callaway Paradym 4-PW Titleist Vokey SM9 50-08, 54-10 & 58-08 Scotty Cameron Super Select Newport 2.5 2023 Titleist ProV1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GolfSpy TCB Posted September 20, 2022 Author Share Posted September 20, 2022 While my SM9's performed in the top 5 in most testing categories... the Taylormade Milled Grind 3 was far and away rated best in all categories except consistency, and didn't perform well in the wet test... though compared to the Glide 4, nothing really did. However, the testing results are strong enough for me to consider giving them a tryout against what I consider the best wedges I have ever played. What are your thoughts about the results, and if you are playing the MG3, how have they performed for you? Quote Titleist TSR3 9* (A2 setting) Driver - Graphite Design Tour AD UB-5 R1 Titleist TSR2+ 3 Wood - Graphite Design Tour AD UB-5 R1 Srixon ZX 5W Callaway Paradym 4-PW Titleist Vokey SM9 50-08, 54-10 & 58-08 Scotty Cameron Super Select Newport 2.5 2023 Titleist ProV1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryan.mzzz Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 so i’m intrigued by the edison forged wedges, and am ‘this close’ to pulling the trigger on giving them a try. however, tony c was pretty categorical in denouncing the wet vs dry performance of small manufacturer wedges in the latest NPG youtube show, and while he mentioned the dry/wet numbers of many of the small manufacturers, he didn’t mention the edison dry/wet numbers. any chance I could get those numbers? I currently have vokey sm7’s in p/g and md forged in s/l, and i was about to get sm8’s for s/l to round out my set, but I like the edisons sales pitch. i live in south florida though, so conditions change quickly. Thanks if anyone is able to share those numbers. Quote D ______ Ping G400 F{3|15} ______ Cobra King F9 X{3|19} ______ Ping G425 Hybrid I{5|24} {6|27} {7|31} {8|35} {9|40} Callaway Apex CF16 W{45|50} _____ Vokey SM8 W{54|58} _____ Vokey SM9 P ____________ L.A.B. DF 2.1 w/ Stability Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cnosil Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 18 minutes ago, ryan.mzzz said: any chance I could get those numbers? The most wanted article points you to the data: https://mygolfspy.com/wedge-data/ ryan.mzzz 1 Quote Driver: G400 Max 9* w/ KBS Tour Driven Fairway: TS3 15* w/Project X Hzardous Smoke Hybrids: 915H 21* w/KBS Tour Graphite Hybrid Prototype 915H 24* w/KBS Tour Graphite Hybrid Prototype Irons: TR20V 6-11 w/Vizard TR20-85 Graphite Wedge: 54/12D, 60/8M w/:Accra iWedge 90 Graphite Putter: Sacks Parente MC 3 Stripe Backup Putters: Milled Collection RSX 2, mFGP2, Futura 5W, TM-180 Member: MGS Hitsquad since 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryan.mzzz Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 38 minutes ago, cnosil said: The most wanted article points you to the data: https://mygolfspy.com/wedge-data/ thanks for pointing me to this page. Quote D ______ Ping G400 F{3|15} ______ Cobra King F9 X{3|19} ______ Ping G425 Hybrid I{5|24} {6|27} {7|31} {8|35} {9|40} Callaway Apex CF16 W{45|50} _____ Vokey SM8 W{54|58} _____ Vokey SM9 P ____________ L.A.B. DF 2.1 w/ Stability Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgergolf Posted September 28, 2022 Share Posted September 28, 2022 Would be interested to see the difference between the Milled Grind 3 tested and the HI-toe version, possibly looking at adding a 60 and with the glide 4.0's currently wouldn't mind trying something else. GolfSpy TCB 1 Quote Driver - G425 LST, ALTA CB SLATE 55 STIF TSR3, ACCRA TZ6 60g M4 3 WOOD - G425 SFT, TOUR 75 STIFF 3 HYBRID - G425, HZRDUS SMOKE BLACK 80 RDX HYBRID 4 HYBRID - G425, HZRDUS SMOKE BLACK 80 RDX HYBRID IRONS 5-PW - T150, KBS TOUR 110 WEDGES - GLIDE 4.0, KBS HI-REV 2 , 50degree/54degree/58degree PUTTER - Special Select Newport 2.5 BALL - -ProV1 RANGEFINDER - Z82 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamB1967 Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 On 9/20/2022 at 2:49 AM, Golfspy_TCB said: While my SM9's performed in the top 5 in most testing categories... the Taylormade Milled Grind 3 was far and away rated best in all categories except consistency, and didn't perform well in the wet test... though compared to the Glide 4, nothing really did. However, the testing results are strong enough for me to consider giving them a tryout against what I consider the best wedges I have ever played. What are your thoughts about the results, and if you are playing the MG3, how have they performed for you? I impulse bought MG3 50* and 54* to sit alongside a SM7 58* that I won on a corporate day. Ended up replacing the 58* with MG3 as well. Absolutely love them, I would sleep with my 50* if my wife would let me. I just find it so controllable for full / 3 quarter and half shots as well as run outs around the green. I personally like the look of the raw face though I am not good enough (yet) to say if it really does improve spin characteristics in the wet. I do wonder whether the Most Wanted test was using a 'clean' MG3 out the wrapper or one that has rusted up. The rust out may have given the Glide more a run for it's money on the wet test...?? GolfSpy TCB 1 Quote Brief version, to be updated later Driver - Srixon Z785 with Miyazaki Mahana 5 Stiff 3 Wood - Ping G425 Hybrid / Driving Iron (they swap, regularly!) - Ping G425 3H 19 degrees /Ping G410 Crossover 3 iron 20 degrees Irons (4-PW) - Ping i210 Wedges - TaylorMade MG3 - 50, 54, 58 Putter - Scotty Cameron Phantom X7 or Newport 2 Studio Select (with custom R/W/B infill) when I am feeling retro and can steal it back from my son Shoes - Nike Jordan 1G (only listed because my boy says it will make me look cooler) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cnosil Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 2 hours ago, GrahamB1967 said: I do wonder whether the Most Wanted test was using a 'clean' MG3 out the wrapper or one that has rusted up. The rust out may have given the Glide more a run for it's money on the wet test...?? They start with a new wedge out if the wrapper. Due to being exposed to air and water, there is very light spotty rust by the end of the test; which takes about a month perform. Rust does not impact spin; rust is generally desired to reduce glare. See the below video where rust and spin are discussed: GolfSpy TCB and Josh Ross 2 Quote Driver: G400 Max 9* w/ KBS Tour Driven Fairway: TS3 15* w/Project X Hzardous Smoke Hybrids: 915H 21* w/KBS Tour Graphite Hybrid Prototype 915H 24* w/KBS Tour Graphite Hybrid Prototype Irons: TR20V 6-11 w/Vizard TR20-85 Graphite Wedge: 54/12D, 60/8M w/:Accra iWedge 90 Graphite Putter: Sacks Parente MC 3 Stripe Backup Putters: Milled Collection RSX 2, mFGP2, Futura 5W, TM-180 Member: MGS Hitsquad since 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Ross Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 Very interesting data, love these tests and seeing all the numbers. GolfSpy TCB 1 Quote In my Lux XV Cart Bag: Driver: RADSPEED XB PTC 10.5° Fujikura Speeder Evolution 661 VII Stiff Utility: Apex UW 17° and 19° Project X HZRDUS Smoke Black RDX 70 6.0 4 Hybrid: KING LTDx 21° KBS PGI 85 Stiff Irons: ZX5/ZX7 Project X LZ 6.0 Wedges: 2.0 49°, 53°, 57° Project X LZ 6.0 Putter: L.A.B. DF3 34"/67° Ball: Tour (Thanks MGS for allowing me to test these!) Check out my Official MGS Reviews Below! LX5 Watch - Link Here! Tour and TourX Golf Balls - Link Here! Approach S70 Watch - Link Here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamB1967 Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 25 minutes ago, cnosil said: They start with a new wedge out if the wrapper. Due to being exposed to air and water, there is very light spotty rust by the end of the test; which takes about a month perform. Rust does not impact spin; rust is generally desired to reduce glare. See the below video where rust and spin are discussed: TaylorMade disagree when looking at dry vs wet (where Glide performed best) 'Initial testing showed that in dry conditions raw marginally impacted spin and launch, and, ultimately, the results were very similar when pitted against a chrome-plated wedge. However, when testers added water to the equation, the variance in performance was staggering. With chrome wedges, the data showed an approximate 50% reduction in spin on wet shots. With raw, there was only about a 25% reduction – showcasing a significant improvement. In addition, testing showed that chrome-plated wedge shots could experience a 6°-8° increase in launch going from dry to wet, while a raw face would only result in a 2°-3° increase.' https://www.taylormadegolf.com/clubhouse/158640-raw-face-wedges-why-they-work-and-tips-for-adding-rust.html?lang=en_US Quote Brief version, to be updated later Driver - Srixon Z785 with Miyazaki Mahana 5 Stiff 3 Wood - Ping G425 Hybrid / Driving Iron (they swap, regularly!) - Ping G425 3H 19 degrees /Ping G410 Crossover 3 iron 20 degrees Irons (4-PW) - Ping i210 Wedges - TaylorMade MG3 - 50, 54, 58 Putter - Scotty Cameron Phantom X7 or Newport 2 Studio Select (with custom R/W/B infill) when I am feeling retro and can steal it back from my son Shoes - Nike Jordan 1G (only listed because my boy says it will make me look cooler) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cnosil Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 4 minutes ago, GrahamB1967 said: TaylorMade disagree when looking at dry vs wet (where Glide performed best) 'Initial testing showed that in dry conditions raw marginally impacted spin and launch, and, ultimately, the results were very similar when pitted against a chrome-plated wedge. However, when testers added water to the equation, the variance in performance was staggering. With chrome wedges, the data showed an approximate 50% reduction in spin on wet shots. With raw, there was only about a 25% reduction – showcasing a significant improvement. In addition, testing showed that chrome-plated wedge shots could experience a 6°-8° increase in launch going from dry to wet, while a raw face would only result in a 2°-3° increase.' https://www.taylormadegolf.com/clubhouse/158640-raw-face-wedges-why-they-work-and-tips-for-adding-rust.html?lang=en_US Raw doesn’t mean rust. One of the conclusions for Raw wedges performing better is that they don’t have the plating which impacts the sharpness of grooves. The things you added from the article are not about rust but the raw non chromed finish. In that article they primarily discuss RAW not rust. The main reason for this performance improvement is the inherent roughness of raw steel compared to chrome, which helps preserve friction between the clubface and the ball. Engineers also discovered the maintained integrity of groove geometry. What does that mean in terms we can all understand? Even though plated finishes are very thin (only several microns - getting techy on you again - with a micron measuring 0.001mm), the addition of the plating still dilutes the shape of the grooves in a wedge. With raw wedges, how the grooves are machined is exactly how they finish. Designed with precise intent and unencumbered by an outside element that could change the resulting geometry. they do talk a little about rust and that it may provide a slight performance improvement. RAW Face Technology does the bulk of the heavy lifting, as each wedge is designed to deliver optimal performance right out of the box, but rust is like the cherry on top. It doesn’t make or break the performance but acts as an added bonus. As the face oxidizes over time, there is the chance of slight performance improvements due to the maintained surface roughness. Searches of the internet and a reviews of other articles confirms that raw wedges may get better wet/dry performance but it isn’t the rust that provides the benefit. Quote Driver: G400 Max 9* w/ KBS Tour Driven Fairway: TS3 15* w/Project X Hzardous Smoke Hybrids: 915H 21* w/KBS Tour Graphite Hybrid Prototype 915H 24* w/KBS Tour Graphite Hybrid Prototype Irons: TR20V 6-11 w/Vizard TR20-85 Graphite Wedge: 54/12D, 60/8M w/:Accra iWedge 90 Graphite Putter: Sacks Parente MC 3 Stripe Backup Putters: Milled Collection RSX 2, mFGP2, Futura 5W, TM-180 Member: MGS Hitsquad since 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GolfSpy TCB Posted October 6, 2022 Author Share Posted October 6, 2022 1 hour ago, GrahamB1967 said: TaylorMade disagree when looking at dry vs wet cnosil 1 Quote Titleist TSR3 9* (A2 setting) Driver - Graphite Design Tour AD UB-5 R1 Titleist TSR2+ 3 Wood - Graphite Design Tour AD UB-5 R1 Srixon ZX 5W Callaway Paradym 4-PW Titleist Vokey SM9 50-08, 54-10 & 58-08 Scotty Cameron Super Select Newport 2.5 2023 Titleist ProV1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cnosil Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 1 hour ago, Golfspy_TCB said: It’s not just an MGS opinion, it is the general answer across the industry as can be observed with a simple google search. I’d consider it one of those golf myths that keeps getting spread. GolfSpy TCB 1 Quote Driver: G400 Max 9* w/ KBS Tour Driven Fairway: TS3 15* w/Project X Hzardous Smoke Hybrids: 915H 21* w/KBS Tour Graphite Hybrid Prototype 915H 24* w/KBS Tour Graphite Hybrid Prototype Irons: TR20V 6-11 w/Vizard TR20-85 Graphite Wedge: 54/12D, 60/8M w/:Accra iWedge 90 Graphite Putter: Sacks Parente MC 3 Stripe Backup Putters: Milled Collection RSX 2, mFGP2, Futura 5W, TM-180 Member: MGS Hitsquad since 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamB1967 Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 1 hour ago, cnosil said: Raw doesn’t mean rust. One of the conclusions for Raw wedges performing better is that they don’t have the plating which impacts the sharpness of grooves. The things you added from the article are not about rust but the raw non chromed finish. In that article they primarily discuss RAW not rust. The main reason for this performance improvement is the inherent roughness of raw steel compared to chrome, which helps preserve friction between the clubface and the ball. Engineers also discovered the maintained integrity of groove geometry. What does that mean in terms we can all understand? Even though plated finishes are very thin (only several microns - getting techy on you again - with a micron measuring 0.001mm), the addition of the plating still dilutes the shape of the grooves in a wedge. With raw wedges, how the grooves are machined is exactly how they finish. Designed with precise intent and unencumbered by an outside element that could change the resulting geometry. they do talk a little about rust and that it may provide a slight performance improvement. RAW Face Technology does the bulk of the heavy lifting, as each wedge is designed to deliver optimal performance right out of the box, but rust is like the cherry on top. It doesn’t make or break the performance but acts as an added bonus. As the face oxidizes over time, there is the chance of slight performance improvements due to the maintained surface roughness. Searches of the internet and a reviews of other articles confirms that raw wedges may get better wet/dry performance but it isn’t the rust that provides the benefit. So not all raw faces rust (if you let them)? We may be at crossed purposes here. The premise is not that raw / rusted wedges spin more, it is that the spin drop off when the ball and / or face is wet is less than with a chromed face. My gaming irons are actually PING i210s which share the groove technology of the earlier Glide wedges. The work PING have been doing to disperse water at impact is impressive, my only point was that, if we accept a the basic premise / research that raw / rusted do have an impact of spin drop off, then the benchmark that the Glide provides for face / ball interaction in the wet might be better compared to raw wedges (not just the MG3s) once the 'cherry is on top' and the raw steel is in the optimum condition to manage the moisture. Rust is, after all, oxidization of the surface that will changes the composition and texture of the face. Quote Brief version, to be updated later Driver - Srixon Z785 with Miyazaki Mahana 5 Stiff 3 Wood - Ping G425 Hybrid / Driving Iron (they swap, regularly!) - Ping G425 3H 19 degrees /Ping G410 Crossover 3 iron 20 degrees Irons (4-PW) - Ping i210 Wedges - TaylorMade MG3 - 50, 54, 58 Putter - Scotty Cameron Phantom X7 or Newport 2 Studio Select (with custom R/W/B infill) when I am feeling retro and can steal it back from my son Shoes - Nike Jordan 1G (only listed because my boy says it will make me look cooler) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cnosil Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 57 minutes ago, GrahamB1967 said: So not all raw faces rust (if you let them)? We may be at crossed purposes here. The premise is not that raw / rusted wedges spin more, it is that the spin drop off when the ball and / or face is wet is less than with a chromed face. My gaming irons are actually PING i210s which share the groove technology of the earlier Glide wedges. The work PING have been doing to disperse water at impact is impressive, my only point was that, if we accept a the basic premise / research that raw / rusted do have an impact of spin drop off, then the benchmark that the Glide provides for face / ball interaction in the wet might be better compared to raw wedges (not just the MG3s) once the 'cherry is on top' and the raw steel is in the optimum condition to manage the moisture. Rust is, after all, oxidization of the surface that will changes the composition and texture of the face. Agree with what you say here; raw wedges tend to spin more than the chromed counterpart not due to rust but the actual surface of the wedge. This does show that ping has done amazing work with their plating and it’s impact on spin when wet. I was commenting on your original statement regarding amount of rust on the tested wedge and the rust may have given it some advantage. We have gotten to the point that the improved performANC’s was potentially due to face Milling and lack of plating. I can assure you there was minimal rust on the wedge; I am one of their most wanted testers. Quote Driver: G400 Max 9* w/ KBS Tour Driven Fairway: TS3 15* w/Project X Hzardous Smoke Hybrids: 915H 21* w/KBS Tour Graphite Hybrid Prototype 915H 24* w/KBS Tour Graphite Hybrid Prototype Irons: TR20V 6-11 w/Vizard TR20-85 Graphite Wedge: 54/12D, 60/8M w/:Accra iWedge 90 Graphite Putter: Sacks Parente MC 3 Stripe Backup Putters: Milled Collection RSX 2, mFGP2, Futura 5W, TM-180 Member: MGS Hitsquad since 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GolfSpy TCB Posted October 6, 2022 Author Share Posted October 6, 2022 3 hours ago, cnosil said: It’s not just an MGS opinion, it is the general answer across the industry as can be observed with a simple google search. I’d consider it one of those golf myths that keeps getting spread. My clip was promoting the mission statement of MGS. Just clarifying. OP noted that TaylorMade had different outcomes... but that is the whole point of independent testing such as MyGolfSpy. cnosil 1 Quote Titleist TSR3 9* (A2 setting) Driver - Graphite Design Tour AD UB-5 R1 Titleist TSR2+ 3 Wood - Graphite Design Tour AD UB-5 R1 Srixon ZX 5W Callaway Paradym 4-PW Titleist Vokey SM9 50-08, 54-10 & 58-08 Scotty Cameron Super Select Newport 2.5 2023 Titleist ProV1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueberry_Squishie Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 (edited) Might have been answered elsewhere but is there a reason Mizuno product wasn't in the test? I'm thinking of replacing wedges and it would be handy to know whether it would be useful to look around at other models. Edited October 6, 2022 by Blueberry_Squishie Quote Cobra F9 9.5° (Hzrdus Yellow X) Cobra Speedzone 15° (Tensei Blue X) Srixon H85 19° (Hzrdus Black 85 6.0) Mizuno MP20 MMC 4-PW (KBS $ Taper 120S) Mizuno T20 51°, 55°, 59° (KBS $ Taper 120S) Scotty Cameron Phantom X 5.5 34" Srixon ZStar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GolfSpy TCB Posted October 6, 2022 Author Share Posted October 6, 2022 6 minutes ago, Blueberry_Squishie said: Might have been answered elsewhere but is there a reason Mizuno product wasn't in the test? I'm thinking of replacing wedges and it would be handy to know whether it would be useful to look around at other models. Usually it has to do with one of two reasons... either there isn't a new model since the last test, or the OEM chose not to submit a club for the testing. In this case, the reason for no Mizuno in the test was answered in the blog comments: cnosil 1 Quote Titleist TSR3 9* (A2 setting) Driver - Graphite Design Tour AD UB-5 R1 Titleist TSR2+ 3 Wood - Graphite Design Tour AD UB-5 R1 Srixon ZX 5W Callaway Paradym 4-PW Titleist Vokey SM9 50-08, 54-10 & 58-08 Scotty Cameron Super Select Newport 2.5 2023 Titleist ProV1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueberry_Squishie Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 Thanks. Next question, they keep the testing procedures consistent year to year? (apart from the human element) Quote Cobra F9 9.5° (Hzrdus Yellow X) Cobra Speedzone 15° (Tensei Blue X) Srixon H85 19° (Hzrdus Black 85 6.0) Mizuno MP20 MMC 4-PW (KBS $ Taper 120S) Mizuno T20 51°, 55°, 59° (KBS $ Taper 120S) Scotty Cameron Phantom X 5.5 34" Srixon ZStar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cnosil Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 1 hour ago, Blueberry_Squishie said: Thanks. Next question, they keep the testing procedures consistent year to year? (apart from the human element) The protocols we follow are pretty consistent from year to year but does vary across the different clubs types. For example wedges may be 3 sets of 4, drivers may be 4 sets of 4, another club may be 3 sets of 4 and a set of 3. I believe that the formulas they use to process the data are updated/tweaked from year to year. Quote Driver: G400 Max 9* w/ KBS Tour Driven Fairway: TS3 15* w/Project X Hzardous Smoke Hybrids: 915H 21* w/KBS Tour Graphite Hybrid Prototype 915H 24* w/KBS Tour Graphite Hybrid Prototype Irons: TR20V 6-11 w/Vizard TR20-85 Graphite Wedge: 54/12D, 60/8M w/:Accra iWedge 90 Graphite Putter: Sacks Parente MC 3 Stripe Backup Putters: Milled Collection RSX 2, mFGP2, Futura 5W, TM-180 Member: MGS Hitsquad since 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamB1967 Posted October 7, 2022 Share Posted October 7, 2022 14 hours ago, cnosil said: Agree with what you say here; raw wedges tend to spin more than the chromed counterpart not due to rust but the actual surface of the wedge. This does show that ping has done amazing work with their plating and it’s impact on spin when wet. I was commenting on your original statement regarding amount of rust on the tested wedge and the rust may have given it some advantage. We have gotten to the point that the improved performANC’s was potentially due to face Milling and lack of plating. I can assure you there was minimal rust on the wedge; I am one of their most wanted testers. I had no intent to question the integrity of the test, perhaps all I was doing - with a flippant comment - was highlighting the difficulty that the huge number of options, proprietary technologies and ‘gimmicks’ in the equipment world create when making any comparisons. I’m still a bit old school at heart. I am of the generation where you went to a golf shop and came away with what they had in stock. Changing a shaft only ever happened after someone bent one when it had flown further than their ball in the wet (quite common with grips ‘back then’) and it landed awkwardly. Since my return to regular golf I have become a little fascinated / obsessed by what technology can now do and how it has changed the game. I sometimes have to remind myself that, in the end, it is the human being on the end of the club that still has the most influence on outcome! cnosil 1 Quote Brief version, to be updated later Driver - Srixon Z785 with Miyazaki Mahana 5 Stiff 3 Wood - Ping G425 Hybrid / Driving Iron (they swap, regularly!) - Ping G425 3H 19 degrees /Ping G410 Crossover 3 iron 20 degrees Irons (4-PW) - Ping i210 Wedges - TaylorMade MG3 - 50, 54, 58 Putter - Scotty Cameron Phantom X7 or Newport 2 Studio Select (with custom R/W/B infill) when I am feeling retro and can steal it back from my son Shoes - Nike Jordan 1G (only listed because my boy says it will make me look cooler) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.