Maltby MPF Scoring

[KurtActual]

Thanks @Popeye64
Pretty cool hands-on example of how MPF is a pretty good guide. The way you describe hitting the PTM is probably exactly what Maltby was hoping for.

Like I said in a previous post, I think the concept of playability diminishes the lower your handicap is.

[Popeye64]

Thanks [mention=75887]Popeye64[/mention]
Pretty cool hands-on example of how MPF is a pretty good guide. The way you describe hitting the PTM is probably exactly what Maltby was hoping for.
Like I said in a previous post, I think the concept of playability diminishes the lower your handicap is.

I think that is a big part of the reason why people can't grasp the MPF.
Too long a hosel is weight too high. Short blade length kills MOI and so on.
But seeing it visually between a high scoring club and a low club helps.
But the entire MPF is out the window for a golfer who pure strikes a club again and again.

Sent from my SM-G981U using Tapatalk

[AmishJason]

7 hours ago, Popeye64 said:

I think that is a big part of the reason why people can't grasp the MPF.
Too long a hosel is weight too high. Short blade length kills MOI and so on.
But seeing it visually between a high scoring club and a low club helps.
But the entire MPF is out the window for a golfer who pure strikes a club again and again.

Sent from my SM-G981U using Tapatalk
 

Your last two posts about the physical science shed some really good light on the MPF ratings.  I think some people are going to naturally balk and have a fit when they see things like known GI or SGI clubs listed as something other than that and some tour level irons listed as GI irons.

[AmishJason]

On 9/9/2020 at 10:25 AM, Hook DeLoft said:

i.e. the shaft ratings, what characteristics would make a shaft help correct a hook or slice? 

This a valid question that I'm going to bump.