Tsecor Posted July 10, 2021 Share Posted July 10, 2021 When choosing a ball for yourself, do you really put a lot of stock on the spin numbers for anything under 150 yards? i mean if a ball has 1000 more RPM's but is only airborne for 5 seconds, how many RPM's are really considered effective when the ball hits the green? revolutions measured by the minute for a flight that takes 5 seconds is so minimal when the ball hits the green, i am not sure why this is such a huge factor in ball selection..... angle of decent and height are far more important in holding greens. Why is spin such a huge factor in short game ball selection? Quote Golf is cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RickyBobby_PR Posted July 10, 2021 Share Posted July 10, 2021 I rarely put my game on a launch monitor so don’t know my numbers or what the impact between 1000 or 500 rpm is, but there’s multiple videos out there of people testing balls and comparing spin and the results. but there’s going to be a difference in how a ball flies and reacts with 1000 rpm difference whether it’s short game or full swing. Spin along with launch play a roll in land angle https://blog.trackmangolf.com/spin-rate/ TR1PTIK 1 Quote Driver: PXG 0811 X+ Proto w/UST Helium 5F4 Wood: TaylorMade M5 5W w/Accra TZ5 +1/2”, TaylorMade Sim 3W w/Aldila rogue white Hybrid: PXG Gen2 22* w/AD hybrid Irons: PXG Gen3 0311T w/Nippon modus 120 Wedges: TaylorMade MG2 50*, Tiger grind 56/60 Putter: Scotty Caemeron Super Rat1 Ball: Titleist Prov1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveP043 Posted July 10, 2021 Share Posted July 10, 2021 2 hours ago, Tsecor said: angle of decent and height are far more important in holding greens. The flight of the ball is significantly influenced by spin, more backspin will generally result in higher peak height, and steeper descent. So using a ball that spins more on shorter shots will increase green holding three different ways, more height, steeper descent, and more backspin at landing. HeathS16, Beakbryce, cnosil and 4 others 7 Quote Irons Titleist T200, AMT Red stiff Rogue SubZero, GD YS-Six X T22 54 and 58 wedges 7-wood 5-wood B60 G5i putter Right handed Reston, Virginia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moops Posted July 11, 2021 Share Posted July 11, 2021 Rpm is a measurement of rate of rotation. How long it’s in flight is only going to change how long it can affect the ball flight, not how much affect per second. the spin is a direct result of multiple factors, including loft at impact, compression, friction, etc. but all other things being equal, the cause of the spin differences from ball to ball are greatly coming from coefficient of friction differences between the ball and the club face. This implies a relationship between launch angle and the spinny-ness of a ball, too, as the friction will interact with the trigonometry relative to the normal vector between the ball and the club face at impact. so you have a different launch angle, different behavior in the air, and different behavior on landing. Seems pretty clear that spin is a big factor in the things you care about. TR1PTIK and Dave Tutelman 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GregGarner Posted July 12, 2021 Share Posted July 12, 2021 Pretty easy to test for yourself, but a quick example I had recently was testing out some TP5s and anything inside of 140 yards was ripping back. Swap over to TP5x and I get more of a hop-and-stop. I don't mind higher spin on longer irons (was able to stuff a 6i on a par 3 and a 5i approach on a par 4 using TP5) but for those to be gameable, I would need to figure out how to reduce spin on short irons and wedges. Interestingly, the TP5 is lower launch than the x, so I know it's not just a matter of a steep angle of descent causing it to rip back. TR1PTIK 1 Quote Driver: ZX5 LS MkII 9.5* (@ 9.0*) with 46.5" Ventus Blue 6X 3-wood: SIM 15* with Diamana Limited 75S 5-wood: RADspeed 18.5* with Motore X F3 60S 2i: ZX with SteelFiber i95 Stiff 4hy: TS3 23* with Tensei AV Blue 70 S 4i-7i ZX7, 8i-PW Z-Forged, Modus3 Tour 120 S 50*, 55* RTX 6 Modus3 Tour 125 60* RTX Full Face ZipCore DG Spinner S400 Putter: Toulon Chicago with a Quad Tour or HB SOFT Milled 10.5S with UST All-in Ball: Chrome Tour (but I might still have some Left Dashes hanging around) Bag: Ltd Edition Tartan, blue/green/yellow Using to keep track of my shots Tested: D7 Forged 3i-PW, KBS Tour-V 110S - Official Review Blind Ball Test (Ball #3 vs Ball #4) - Unofficial Review V3 GPS Watch + Tags - Official Review Vero X2 - Official Review The Stack System - Official Review Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRW Posted July 12, 2021 Share Posted July 12, 2021 On 7/10/2021 at 1:45 PM, DaveP043 said: The flight of the ball is significantly influenced by spin, more backspin will generally result in higher peak height, and steeper descent. So using a ball that spins more on shorter shots will increase green holding three different ways, more height, steeper descent, and more backspin at landing. That’s typically incorrect. Higher spin generally means lower launch and lower peak height. An exception would be comparing someone with more of a textbook/good swing versus someone who flips and presents too much loft at impact. thechrisgibbs 1 Quote Ogio Woode 8 Hybrid Stand Bag PXG 0811 X Gen4 @ 6* - Fujikura Motore X F3 7X PXG 0211 @ 13.5* - Fujikura Motore X F1 8X PXG 0311 XP Gen3 3i-PW - PX LZ 6.5 PXG 0311 Forged 54/60 - PX LZ 6.5 Scotty Cameron Special Select Newport 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsecor Posted July 12, 2021 Author Share Posted July 12, 2021 10 hours ago, greggarner said: Pretty easy to test for yourself, but a quick example I had recently was testing out some TP5s and anything inside of 140 yards was ripping back. Swap over to TP5x and I get more of a hop-and-stop. I don't mind higher spin on longer irons (was able to stuff a 6i on a par 3 and a 5i approach on a par 4 using TP5) but for those to be gameable, I would need to figure out how to reduce spin on short irons and wedges. Interestingly, the TP5 is lower launch than the x, so I know it's not just a matter of a steep angle of descent causing it to rip back. are these the 2019 or 2021 balls from all the testing I have seen the 2021 balls are very similar to one another and spin rates differences are minimal at best. Typically 300 rpms which equates to nothing in a 6 second flight. Quote Golf is cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GregGarner Posted July 12, 2021 Share Posted July 12, 2021 1 hour ago, Tsecor said: are these the 2019 or 2021 balls This is a good point. The TP5s I had were 2021 but the X's were 2019s. In the TXG test, the difference in spin between the 2019 TP5x and the 2021 TP5x was about 300 rpm but the TP5 spin stayed pretty similar between 2019 and 2021. So yes, the difference has narrowed between the two, but there's still a difference and the flight time doesn't really matter, since the readings are taken at impact and, if anything, spin will gradually decrease the longer the ball is in the air. If I took a rubber bouncy ball and tossed it on my hardwood floor, I could pretty well model the same effect where something I spin aggressively has more 'grab' and comes back at me vs something I just toss may even bounce forward. The rpm differential between the bouncy balls wouldn't be as high as with golf balls, but golf balls have slicker covers and aren't landing on wood (well. ideally...). But as a a player, if I were already playing in conditions where I was going to have less spin coming into a green (i.e. worn grooves on my wedges, downwind, shallow angle of attack, slower clubhead speed, etc) I may not be able to tell the difference in balls because I'm not ultimately generating much difference. This might not be the case for someone gaming fresh wedges, high clubhead speed, and a steep AoA as they'll naturally generate more spin of all balls and the ball construction matters more for them. Tsecor 1 Quote Driver: ZX5 LS MkII 9.5* (@ 9.0*) with 46.5" Ventus Blue 6X 3-wood: SIM 15* with Diamana Limited 75S 5-wood: RADspeed 18.5* with Motore X F3 60S 2i: ZX with SteelFiber i95 Stiff 4hy: TS3 23* with Tensei AV Blue 70 S 4i-7i ZX7, 8i-PW Z-Forged, Modus3 Tour 120 S 50*, 55* RTX 6 Modus3 Tour 125 60* RTX Full Face ZipCore DG Spinner S400 Putter: Toulon Chicago with a Quad Tour or HB SOFT Milled 10.5S with UST All-in Ball: Chrome Tour (but I might still have some Left Dashes hanging around) Bag: Ltd Edition Tartan, blue/green/yellow Using to keep track of my shots Tested: D7 Forged 3i-PW, KBS Tour-V 110S - Official Review Blind Ball Test (Ball #3 vs Ball #4) - Unofficial Review V3 GPS Watch + Tags - Official Review Vero X2 - Official Review The Stack System - Official Review Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsecor Posted July 12, 2021 Author Share Posted July 12, 2021 5 minutes ago, greggarner said: This is a good point. The TP5s I had were 2021 but the X's were 2019s. In the TXG test, the difference in spin between the 2019 TP5x and the 2021 TP5x was about 300 rpm but the TP5 spin stayed pretty similar between 2019 and 2021. So yes, the difference has narrowed between the two, but there's still a difference and the flight time doesn't really matter, since the readings are taken at impact and, if anything, spin will gradually decrease the longer the ball is in the air. If I took a rubber bouncy ball and tossed it on my hardwood floor, I could pretty well model the same effect where something I spin aggressively has more 'grab' and comes back at me vs something I just toss may even bounce forward. The rpm differential between the bouncy balls wouldn't be as high as with golf balls, but golf balls have slicker covers and aren't landing on wood (well. ideally...). But as a a player, if I were already playing in conditions where I was going to have less spin coming into a green (i.e. worn grooves on my wedges, downwind, shallow angle of attack, slower clubhead speed, etc) I may not be able to tell the difference in balls because I'm not ultimately generating much difference. This might not be the case for someone gaming fresh wedges, high clubhead speed, and a steep AoA as they'll naturally generate more spin of all balls and the ball construction matters more for them. The difference in spin between the 2019 X and the 2019 TP5 is almost 1000 on the 50 yard wedge...but i disagree with time in air because its been proven that each second the ball is in the air, it loses 3-4% of its spin.....so it would be helpful for these ball tests to possibly show spin degredation between models.....if its quantifiable....does an X model, lose less spin over a 6 second flight? its all very interesting. Quote Golf is cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
null Posted July 12, 2021 Share Posted July 12, 2021 36 minutes ago, Tsecor said: The difference in spin between the 2019 X and the 2019 TP5 is almost 1000 on the 50 yard wedge...but i disagree with time in air because its been proven that each second the ball is in the air, it loses 3-4% of its spin.....so it would be helpful for these ball tests to possibly show spin degredation between models.....if its quantifiable....does an X model, lose less spin over a 6 second flight? its all very interesting. For me it's about how the launch monitor numbers translate to the course. I prefer to do my ball testing on the course without a launch monitor. Does the ball perform on the course and allow me to hit the shots I want to hit is really all that matters. Launch monitors are a good starting point if you want to rule out some balls, but GC Quad does noting to tell you about aerodynamics. Tsecor, CRW, TR1PTIK and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsecor Posted July 16, 2021 Author Share Posted July 16, 2021 id love to see the ball test with cameras on a green to see how the 8 iron and wedge shots look for each brand. Quote Golf is cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MNUte Posted July 19, 2021 Share Posted July 19, 2021 It definitely means something, though that is different for each player. My focus is on consistency of result, regardless of what the result actually is. I almost never get backspin on my wedge shots, but I almost always get them to take one or two bounces and check up. If you know what is going to consistently happen, you can plan your game around it. So having consistent spin so you have consistent results is very important. Quote Rag tag bag, but it does the job. Taylormade R1 driver. Ping G400 3 wood. Cleveland Halo Launcher 3 hybrid. Cleveland CBX launcher irons (5-PW). Assorted wedges (48, 52, 58). Odyssey White Hot Pro 2.0 putter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GregGarner Posted July 20, 2021 Share Posted July 20, 2021 (edited) On 7/16/2021 at 9:40 AM, Tsecor said: id love to see the ball test with cameras on a green to see how the 8 iron and wedge shots look for each brand. I'm not saying you need to swallow the whole pill here, but I did think the videos were fun https://www.titleist.com/teamtitleist/b/tourblog/posts/when-should-you-replace-your-wedges Edited July 20, 2021 by greggarner typos TR1PTIK 1 Quote Driver: ZX5 LS MkII 9.5* (@ 9.0*) with 46.5" Ventus Blue 6X 3-wood: SIM 15* with Diamana Limited 75S 5-wood: RADspeed 18.5* with Motore X F3 60S 2i: ZX with SteelFiber i95 Stiff 4hy: TS3 23* with Tensei AV Blue 70 S 4i-7i ZX7, 8i-PW Z-Forged, Modus3 Tour 120 S 50*, 55* RTX 6 Modus3 Tour 125 60* RTX Full Face ZipCore DG Spinner S400 Putter: Toulon Chicago with a Quad Tour or HB SOFT Milled 10.5S with UST All-in Ball: Chrome Tour (but I might still have some Left Dashes hanging around) Bag: Ltd Edition Tartan, blue/green/yellow Using to keep track of my shots Tested: D7 Forged 3i-PW, KBS Tour-V 110S - Official Review Blind Ball Test (Ball #3 vs Ball #4) - Unofficial Review V3 GPS Watch + Tags - Official Review Vero X2 - Official Review The Stack System - Official Review Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheProfessor Posted August 4, 2021 Share Posted August 4, 2021 Spin absolutely matters for holding greens, though less so for the 150 yard shot. I'm not really sure about the focus on flight time, they don't all trend to a certain spin number, if the ball starts with more it will end with more. I'd much rather stop a ball with spin than trajectory from 50 yards, I don't want to play those shots up in the air unless the shot absolutely requires it. Quote 917 D3 9.5* Kiyoshi Black 65-05 917 F3 15* VA Drago 75-X 818 H2 19* Ventus Black 10-TX MP-20 MB 3-9 PX 6.5, T20 47* PX 6.5 SM7 54-10S/60-08M PX 6.5/6.0 Scotty Cameron Special Select Squareback 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noodle3872 Posted August 5, 2021 Share Posted August 5, 2021 I feel like Dave Pelz answered this question in his Short Game Bible. IIRC, steeper descent angle leads causes more energy loss at impact with the ground, the ball bounces more vertically and stops quicker. Londo 1 Quote Ping G430 Max 10K 10.5° driver - Diamana GT 60S Ping G430 Max 15° #3 fairway - Diamana TB 70S Ping G430 Max 21° #7 fairway - Diamana TB 80S Ping G430 Max 26° #5 hybrid - MMTh 90S Mizuno Pro 243 4-PW irons - MMT 105S Mizuno T24 Raw 48°-10S wedge - MMT 105S Mizuno T24 Raw 54°-10S and 60°-06X wedges - MMT Scoring Wedge 105S Ping PLD Ally Blue 4 Titleist Pro V1x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GregGarner Posted August 6, 2021 Share Posted August 6, 2021 On 8/4/2021 at 11:58 PM, noodle3872 said: I feel like Dave Pelz answered this question in his Short Game Bible. IIRC, steeper descent angle leads causes more energy loss at impact with the ground, the ball bounces more vertically and stops quicker. True when all spin is held constant, but what does it look like when the lower trajectory shot has more spin than the higher trajectory one? (Which is why you see Tour pros trying to get lower launch angles, sub-30 degrees on partial wedges.) Quote Driver: ZX5 LS MkII 9.5* (@ 9.0*) with 46.5" Ventus Blue 6X 3-wood: SIM 15* with Diamana Limited 75S 5-wood: RADspeed 18.5* with Motore X F3 60S 2i: ZX with SteelFiber i95 Stiff 4hy: TS3 23* with Tensei AV Blue 70 S 4i-7i ZX7, 8i-PW Z-Forged, Modus3 Tour 120 S 50*, 55* RTX 6 Modus3 Tour 125 60* RTX Full Face ZipCore DG Spinner S400 Putter: Toulon Chicago with a Quad Tour or HB SOFT Milled 10.5S with UST All-in Ball: Chrome Tour (but I might still have some Left Dashes hanging around) Bag: Ltd Edition Tartan, blue/green/yellow Using to keep track of my shots Tested: D7 Forged 3i-PW, KBS Tour-V 110S - Official Review Blind Ball Test (Ball #3 vs Ball #4) - Unofficial Review V3 GPS Watch + Tags - Official Review Vero X2 - Official Review The Stack System - Official Review Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.