Sluggo42 Posted May 20, 2018 Share Posted May 20, 2018 Is it kind of like drag racing, ? when it's fairly easy to go from a 20 second car to a 12 second car. But it brutally expensive to go from a 10 second car to a 7 second car TSr2 on tensi blue stiff Speedzone 3-wood on Tensi blue S Epic Max 5 and 7 woods on HZRDUS Reg flex Paradym 9 wood on HZRDUS reg flex P770 / P790 combo set on Ventus R-6 shafts 6-AW T22 Denim Copper 54°, 58° on Kinetic X Trajectory ER3 or, E.A.S. #4 (“Fang” or “Adele”) ProV1x, or, Maxfli Tour X .Org 14 cart bag Adidas Tour 360 , or Sketcher shoes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaskanski Posted May 20, 2018 Share Posted May 20, 2018 I assume you're talking about handicaps? In which case I'd say that going from 5 to scratch is probably harder - in that you need to be a lot more consistent for a lot more of your time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIG STU Posted May 20, 2018 Share Posted May 20, 2018 I assume you're talking about handicaps? In which case I'd say that going from 5 to scratch is probably harder - in that you need to be a lot more consistent for a lot more of your time. Yep you nailed it Driver ---- Callaway Big Bertha Alpha Speeder 565 R flex- - 7W TM V-Steel UST Pro Force Gold 65R---- Irons 5 thru PW 1980 Macgregor VIP Hogan Apex steel shafts--- SW -- Cleveland 588 56* S-400 Sensicore --- LW Vokey 58* SM5 L grind--- Putter 1997 Scotty Cameron Santa Fe Fluted Bulls Eye shaft--- Bag TM Flex Lite Stand---- Yeah I know only 11 clubs G Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NM01 Posted May 20, 2018 Share Posted May 20, 2018 The lower the hdcp the harder to go lower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GolfJunkie302 Posted May 20, 2018 Share Posted May 20, 2018 Probably 5-0. At some point, you have to bottom out. The closer you get to that point, the harder it is to get there. This is a quick sketch of what I imagine the graph would look like: Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk 2017 M1 460, Project X HZRDUS Black 6.0 JPX EZ 3 wood Fly-Z 4H MP-60, 3i-PW, True Temper Dynamic Gold S5 54° & 58°, True Temper Dynamic Gold California Monterey Pro V1x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
00sportsman Posted May 20, 2018 Share Posted May 20, 2018 I would definitely agree going from a 20 to a 5 would be easier. Sent from my XT1585 using MyGolfSpy mobile app I always try to remember that I'm not good enough to get mad! My Bag: G400 Max G30 3W King S9-1 5W Aeroburner 3 Rescue/Hybrid G400 5-UW RTX4 52* and 56* 2Bar Mallet Traverse II Cart Bag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forzabucks Posted May 20, 2018 Share Posted May 20, 2018 Well I guess this makes me feel better about one day hitting 5. Driver: Great Big Bertha Irons: PXG 0311 Gen 2 Wedges: PXG, Callaway Mack Daddy 3 Putter: ER3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tony@CIC Posted May 20, 2018 Share Posted May 20, 2018 Well I guess this makes me feel better about one day hitting 5. I'd love to be at 10 let alone 5 Sent from my iPad using MyGolfSpy Left Hand orientation SIM 2 D Max with Fujikura Air Speeder Shaft Cobra Radspeed 3W/RIptide Shaft 410 Hybrids 22*, 26* Cobra Speed Zone 6-GP/Recoil ESX 460 F3 Shafts SM7 54* Wedge Glide 3.0 60* Wedge O Works putter V3 NX9-HD - 4 Wheel EZGO TXT 48v cart - too many shoes to list and so many to buy And BAG Boy Golf Balls: Vice Pro Plus 2020 Official Tester Beginning Driver Speed - 78 2019 Official Tester 410 Driver 2018 Official Tester C300 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charli Posted May 20, 2018 Share Posted May 20, 2018 If both players have the same dedication it's like trying to lose weight when your 350 pounds. It's very easy to shed pounds at that weight with very little effort Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkev Posted May 20, 2018 Share Posted May 20, 2018 It would be very difficult to do either but around 15 percent obtain a five and fewer than 1 percent a zero so I'm thinking 5 to zero. Best I could ever do was 5 to .8 Not great. Sent from my iPhone using MyGolfSpy Driver: Taylor Made Stealth 2 10.5 Diamana S plus 60 R flex - 44.25 Fairways: Ping G410 5, 7, 9 wood Alta CB red 65 R flex Hybrid: Ping G410 26 degree Alta CB Red 70 R flex Irons: Ping G430 7-PW, 45, 50 Alta CB black 65 soft R flex Wedges: Ping 195 S54, E58 Wedges and irons are - 1/2” and one degree flat Putter: Sacks Parente Duke 32.5” Ball: Titleist Pro VI or Callaway Chrome Soft X ls While not at the same time I was fit for every club in my bag as well as the Pro VI ball. I use the chrome soft x ls on my league course. It has much softer softer greens than the club that I belong to. I’m on a mission to shoot my age - lifetime lowest round is 66 and I’m currently 67. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GolfJunkie302 Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 . Your graph shows it's essentially the same, when in reality the time involved on reaching scratch (except in very rare cases) would be much longer - and thus the bottom half of your curve should be much more drawn out from left to right. Like I said, it's just a rough sketch with a stylus. But I still disagree. Here is a revised version. Same graph, I just added marks for time. To make it easy, each mark denotes one year, even though that probably isn't super accurate. As you can see on the graph, it would take one year to get from 20 to 5, and four years to get from 5 to 0. It makes sense to me, but I could be doing it wrong... Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk 2017 M1 460, Project X HZRDUS Black 6.0 JPX EZ 3 wood Fly-Z 4H MP-60, 3i-PW, True Temper Dynamic Gold S5 54° & 58°, True Temper Dynamic Gold California Monterey Pro V1x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GolfJunkie302 Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 . But that even lessens the accuracy of your graph, in comparison to the OP, because they didn't mention a time frame. ... And in the greater scheme of stats, there are few if any golfers during a 5 year period that go from never having played to a 20 to a 5, and the ones that go from 20 to scratch during that period are probably 1-in-10,000,000 ... Lesson being, when you draw graphs you have to show it relative to the bigger picture, and graphs ain't easy, and you're showing that there are just as many scratch golfers within 5 years as there are new golfers with 20s. just sayin' So something more like this, and this isn't even good. ... > It must not be evident that I was using a stylus on a square drawing surface. This may come as a surprise, but it's kind of hard to get it perfect. As for my timeline, that obviously only begins at a 20 handicap. It clearly doesn't take into account anything before that point. It could take a golfer four years to get to a 20 handicap, then five after that to get to scratch. That's nine years total. But like I said, that isn't quite accurate. It would probably take longer. Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk 2017 M1 460, Project X HZRDUS Black 6.0 JPX EZ 3 wood Fly-Z 4H MP-60, 3i-PW, True Temper Dynamic Gold S5 54° & 58°, True Temper Dynamic Gold California Monterey Pro V1x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkev Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 It must not be evident that I was using a stylus on a square drawing surface. This may come as a surprise, but it's kind of hard to get it perfect. As for my timeline, that obviously only begins at a 20 handicap. It clearly doesn't take into account anything before that point. It could take a golfer four years to get to a 20 handicap, then five after that to get to scratch. That's nine years total. But like I said, that isn't quite accurate. It would probably take longer. Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk Like never 99 percent of people who play golf never see scratch. 85 percent never see 5. Sent from my iPhone using MyGolfSpy Driver: Taylor Made Stealth 2 10.5 Diamana S plus 60 R flex - 44.25 Fairways: Ping G410 5, 7, 9 wood Alta CB red 65 R flex Hybrid: Ping G410 26 degree Alta CB Red 70 R flex Irons: Ping G430 7-PW, 45, 50 Alta CB black 65 soft R flex Wedges: Ping 195 S54, E58 Wedges and irons are - 1/2” and one degree flat Putter: Sacks Parente Duke 32.5” Ball: Titleist Pro VI or Callaway Chrome Soft X ls While not at the same time I was fit for every club in my bag as well as the Pro VI ball. I use the chrome soft x ls on my league course. It has much softer softer greens than the club that I belong to. I’m on a mission to shoot my age - lifetime lowest round is 66 and I’m currently 67. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peanut05 Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 I'd have to say going from 5 to 0 is definitely harder. I've been trying to get there for the past several years. I got all the way down to a 2, and now back up to a 5-6. I'm hoping one day I'll get there, but my patience is wearing thin. In my bag: Callaway Epic Subzero with Aldila Rogue Max 75 Stiff shaft Callaway Rogue Subzero with Project X Evenflow 6.0 75g stiff shaft Callaway Rogue 3 Hybrid with Aldila Synergy 60 HYB stiff shaft Callaway Apex irons (4-PW) with True Temper XP 95 stiff shafts Callaway MD3 wedges (50/54/58) SeeMore Original FGP Bridgestone Tour B RX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GolfJunkie302 Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 Like never 99 percent of people who play golf never see scratch. 85 percent never see 5. Sent from my iPhone using MyGolfSpy Are we talking about a hack who just wants to have fun with his buds, or are we talking about somebody who's devoting time and money into reaching scratch? My graph depicts the latter. It was simply to show that it takes longer to go from 5-0 than it does 20-5. If you guys want, I can go back and delete my graphs so we aren't spreading misinformation on here. Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk 2017 M1 460, Project X HZRDUS Black 6.0 JPX EZ 3 wood Fly-Z 4H MP-60, 3i-PW, True Temper Dynamic Gold S5 54° & 58°, True Temper Dynamic Gold California Monterey Pro V1x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GregB135 Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 The biggest factor with establishing, maintaining, and lowering a handicap is time. While the handicap index, and trend can help provide an estimate, it takes at least 20 recorded rounds to establish the handicap. A beginning golfer, with moderate athleticism, and a little bit of practice, by the time the finally establish their handicap will likely be in the 20-25 range. From there it is a matter of dedication to practice, and how often they play and record scores to affect the handicap. That same golfer with a lesson or two, one practice session, and one round per week could likely see their handicap move into the mid-teens over their next 20-25 rounds. Moving the handicap lower than that, takes recording consistently lower and lower scores, and lots of time. Overall, for the majority of us that can't dedicate hours every day to practice, and maintaining a consistent play schedule, much harder to go from 5 to scratch, than from 20 to 5. As stated several times, the vast majority of golfers won't ever get below about 10. Driver: 311XF Gen5, Tensei CK Pro Orange, S flex Fariway: 311XF Gen6 3-Wood, Tensei Blue 55g R flex Hybrid: 211, 3H Project X Evenflow H, 80g, 5.5 TSR2 4H, Tensei Blue R (Forum Tester) Irons: T200 2023, Tensei Blue R (Forum Tester), 5-GW Wedges: CBX2 Zipcore 52*, 56* Project X Catalyst Spinner Graphite Shaft Putter: ER2 Murdered Out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sluggo42 Posted May 21, 2018 Author Share Posted May 21, 2018 Here's my thought... It kind of goes back to whether any individual “has itâ€, or doesn't. I don't see anyone ever getting to a 5 without having “itâ€, or basically the root skills and athleticism needed. So as rev points out, the vast majority of players will never get to a 5, but semi decent players can get in the 15-20 range with a relative devotion to the game- say once or twice a week, and some form of practice. But I doubt they get much lower as their skill level bottoms out. But those who do get to a 5, obviously have pretty good skills. If that person devotes a reasonable amount of time to the right type of practice and training, along with some serious mental training, like course management and green reading skills, they have a higher chance of getting there. But again- it's just how I see it... TSr2 on tensi blue stiff Speedzone 3-wood on Tensi blue S Epic Max 5 and 7 woods on HZRDUS Reg flex Paradym 9 wood on HZRDUS reg flex P770 / P790 combo set on Ventus R-6 shafts 6-AW T22 Denim Copper 54°, 58° on Kinetic X Trajectory ER3 or, E.A.S. #4 (“Fang” or “Adele”) ProV1x, or, Maxfli Tour X .Org 14 cart bag Adidas Tour 360 , or Sketcher shoes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAGolfore Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 I agree with most here. Harder to go from 5-0. The strokes are harder to find and it's about playing good golf consistently. Sent from my iPhone using MyGolfSpy Driver: Callaway Rogue 9* FW: Sub 70 Pro 4 wood Hybrid: Sub 70 949 Hybrid 19* Irons: Sub 70 659 CB 4 - 6 Black 639 MB 7 - PW Wedges: Sub 70 JB - 50* 54* & 60* Putter: Odyssey White Hot #2 Ball: Titleist Pro-V1x Handicap index: +3.9 Instagram: joshandersongolf Twitter: @jacustomgolf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDGolfHacker Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 I dropped all the way down to a 7.8 but with even with playing more, haven't been down that low since. Throw some kids in the mix and now I'm floating between a 16-18HC. It was easy to go from a high handicap to single digits, but it seems like more effort and work to go from single to scratch in my experience. MDGolfHacker What's In This Lefty's Bag? Driver: TSR2 11° Project X HZRDUS Black 4G 60g 5.5 Flex Fairway Woods: F8 3W Project X Even Flow Blue 75g shaft Fairway Woods: Hybrid: TSR2 18° Graphite Design Tour AD DI-85 Shaft Irons: 2021 T200's 4-GW AMT RED shafts Regular Flex Wedge: Tour Satin RTX 4 Wedges in 52° and 56° 2 Dot Putter: Gray Matter TDP 2.2 32.75" Bag: Three 5 Ball: PRO V1x / Z*Star RangeFinder: Titan Elite Social Media: Facebook: MD Golfhacker Twitter: @mdgolfhacker Instagram: mdgolfhacker Current MyGolfSpy Review - Precision Pro Titan Elite Rangefinder: https://forum.mygolfspy.com/topic/64979-testers-announced-precision-pro-titan-elite/?do=findComment&comment=1082733 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poprocksncoke Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 Had a friend that took up golf, within a year he worked his way down to an 8 handicap. A couple years past and he couldn't go any lower, he got frustrated and just quit the game completely. SLDR 10.5 Fujikura Ventus Velocore+ Red 6S R11s Rip Phenom Apex Pro 16 Rivl 52 Black Rivl 58 Black EV 5.3 Duo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NM01 Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 Like never 99 percent of people who play golf never see scratch. 85 percent never see 5. Sent from my iPhone using MyGolfSpy Most don't break 100. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zylem Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 Woo hoo get to actually use some statistics stuff here. I would say it more difficult to get to zero. This is due to diminishing returns. You will never progress faster and easier than you do when you first start something. That's because you really only have one way to go, up. At some point, no matter you natural ability, you will hit the point of diminishing returns. Meaning X amount of time spent nets you less progress. Just a guess on my part but I would say the point that diminishing returns starts to hinder golfers around an 18 handicap. (Just guessing here based on that average USGA handicap statistic) Another interesting piece to this puzzle that statistics plays a part in is the difficulty to remove one stroke increases as they average moves lower. This it because the weight of each stroke is higher the fewer there are. It's easier to shave 3 strokes off a 100 than it is off of a 75. Sent from my Pixel using MyGolfSpy mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PMookie Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 I was at a 5 and went back to a 7 in a year. 5 to zero has to be harder. Few chances for bad rounds.... The amount of time I'd have to devote to the game to have gotten 5 more strokes doesn't seem possible with a real life Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro Driver: Ping G430 Max 9*, Ping Tour 70X Fairway: Ping G425 15*, Ping Tour 70X Hybrid: Ping G425 22*, Ping Tour 80X Irons: Ping i230 4-GW, TT DG X100 Wedges: SMS 50D/54V/58DModus 130 stiff, +1” Putter: EAS 1.0 Ball: Titleist 2023 AVX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sluggo42 Posted May 21, 2018 Author Share Posted May 21, 2018 I do not consider golf a sport , or even a pursuit which requires especially good athleticism. Size, strength, speed, excellent hand-eye coordination certainly don't harm a persons chances of shooting low golf scores, but the "athletic factors" are not a requirement like they are for baseball, basketball etc... I've observed plenty of people without any noticeable athletic skills turn themselves into players who can shoot par 72. They did it through learning and practicing swing technique. I've also observed exceptionally gifted athletes, including some who played other sports professionally, that chose to never learn correct golf technique. Despite their extraordinary speed, strength, coordination, and other athletic traits, this type player often struggle to break 90. I thin one of the great aspects of golf is that just about anyone, if they learn and practice good sound fundamental technique, can strike consistently good shots and shoot low scores. I would disagree heartily with this statement. I don't feel that athleticism is limited to size and strength and the lot. A basketball player is one type of athlete. But most basketball players can't play other sports- other than the rare power forward who plays tight end in football. But they sure can't play baseball or hockey for example. A baseball player generally is to small to play basketball or football, so does that mean they aren't athletes? Golf is another type of athleticism which requires insane hand eye coordination, along with superior body control. Just because they aren't rippled with muscles doesn't mean they aren't extremely athletic. Plus they play for 4-5 hours per day, as well as a few hours it warmup and dialing themselves in. And I can't say I've ever seen a scratch shooter who was an uncoordinated goof. Again, just my opinion... TSr2 on tensi blue stiff Speedzone 3-wood on Tensi blue S Epic Max 5 and 7 woods on HZRDUS Reg flex Paradym 9 wood on HZRDUS reg flex P770 / P790 combo set on Ventus R-6 shafts 6-AW T22 Denim Copper 54°, 58° on Kinetic X Trajectory ER3 or, E.A.S. #4 (“Fang” or “Adele”) ProV1x, or, Maxfli Tour X .Org 14 cart bag Adidas Tour 360 , or Sketcher shoes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silver & black Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 It is harder to go from 5 to scratch, no doubt at all. I was down to 8.6 a year ago. I ended that year at a 9.7. I'm sure I'm at least a 10 or 11 right now... maybe more. I just can't play or practice enough, and I don't have the extra money to take lessons anymore. I still enjoy playing, But I may never be a single digit again. Ya know what..... I don't care! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenny B Posted May 22, 2018 Share Posted May 22, 2018 Like I said, it's just a rough sketch with a stylus. But I still disagree. Here is a revised version. Same graph, I just added marks for time. To make it easy, each mark denotes one year, even though that probably isn't super accurate. As you can see on the graph, it would take one year to get from 20 to 5, and four years to get from 5 to 0. It makes sense to me, but I could be doing it wrong...Project%20-%20Drawing%201262124523.png Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk The time line is different for different people. Most people will never get there; some could make it to scratch in a few years, maybe even a year or two with dedicated coaching and training. However, if you extend the graph out enough years, the curve starts to go back up. Wherever you bottom out, the curve goes back up as you age. I know. “We don’t stop playing the game because we get old; we get old because we stop playing the game.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tony@CIC Posted May 22, 2018 Share Posted May 22, 2018 5 to scratch is not even on my horizon. If I can play in the mid 80's I'd be thrilled. I also want to be out having fun with the other guys/gals vs. e work it would take to get to single digits. Sent from my iPad using MyGolfSpy Left Hand orientation SIM 2 D Max with Fujikura Air Speeder Shaft Cobra Radspeed 3W/RIptide Shaft 410 Hybrids 22*, 26* Cobra Speed Zone 6-GP/Recoil ESX 460 F3 Shafts SM7 54* Wedge Glide 3.0 60* Wedge O Works putter V3 NX9-HD - 4 Wheel EZGO TXT 48v cart - too many shoes to list and so many to buy And BAG Boy Golf Balls: Vice Pro Plus 2020 Official Tester Beginning Driver Speed - 78 2019 Official Tester 410 Driver 2018 Official Tester C300 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robertson153 Posted May 22, 2018 Share Posted May 22, 2018 I don't know any statistics here, but here's my story. I started golf around 2 years ago. Started around a high 18 to low 19, beginning of last spring it was down to a 16, at the end of last season it was around a 13. Fast forward to this year (2 solid months into this season) I'm at an even 10. By the end of this season (sometime in October) I expect to be around a 8. I'm self taught so I don't expect to get any lower without lessons and continually playing year round. Will I ever get to scratch? I highly doubt it. Time, money, and life in general will hinder my efforts. That doesn't mean I won't try. So to the OP, 20 to 5 is extremely hard for the average guy, 5 to 0 is all but impossible. I think the number is somewhere around 1.5% of golfers are scratch. For those of you that made graphs, you're both wrong. For 98.5% of us, it will NEVER happen. Sent from my iPhone using MyGolfSpy CobraConnectChallenge3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FarFromScratch389 Posted May 22, 2018 Share Posted May 22, 2018 Got lessons to kick-start my golf career last August. My early-August rounds were in the 110 range. After just hitting the range hard after 4 hours of lessons last summer I started this march in the low-100s and am now consistently shooting in the mid-90s. I'm 27 and can hit it very long. I'm hoping my progression goes like this: By end of this summer: Breaking 90 routinely By this time next year: Shootign mid-80s routinely By end of summer 2019: Handicap around 10 By end of summer 2020 (I'll be 29): Handicap around 5. I don't think it's feasible to think I can go from a 20hdcp to a 5 in one yeary---I think that the 2+ years until the end of the 2020 summer is realistic. Lets say I accomplish that---I'd say it would probably take 3 more years to get that hdcp down to 0, hopefully golfing a bit more in the process. ST 180 Driver & 3W JPX 900 Forged 4i-GW Mizuno MP 2i S22 Wedges Lab Golf Mezz.1 #TrustTheProcess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PING Apologist #9 Posted May 22, 2018 Share Posted May 22, 2018 My 2-cents... I was immersed in competitive target shooting for years in the CMP (Civilian Marksmanship Program) using a service rifle (AR-15) across the National Match Course format (200, 300 & 600-yds w/open sights). As a former Marine, the AR-15/M-16 platform was VERY familiar to me and after only a year of shooting this format, I went right up into expert classification (89-93.99%). My primary goal in this sport was to not only become "distinguished", but also move classification up to at least Master (94-96.99%) or even to the elite High Master level (97% & above). To move up to Master, all I needed to do was be in the 10-ring by more than 94% of the time. My averages at the time were in the 91-93% range and I basically just needed to hit 3 or 4 more 10's or X's per match to move up, so easy right??? WRONG! I shot for over 12-years. I lived that sport from top-to-bottom, had the best equipment & ammunition available, became a coach, line judge, Match Director and even held board positions (V.P.) at my club. Despite all this, I was unable to obtain either of my goals. Those higher levels are for the elite of the elite and even sometimes even with all the practice and training you can possibly sink into something that difficult, there are just some of us who wind up hitting some sort of weird barrier with our mental game, lack of sheer ability or talent. The golf "Holy Grail" of 5-to-scratch has got to be similarly hard to obtain in my opinion. Judging on how hard it is for my formerly "athletic" self to just get below 100, I know it is. In my DLX Cart Bag: Driver: G410 SFT, set to 9.5*, Mitsubishi Tensei CK Orange 60, stiff (MGS Official 2019 Tester) 3W: G-Series SF TEC, set to 16*, Aldila Tour Blue ATX, 65g, stiff 5W: G400 SFT, set to 19*, Aldila Tour Blue ATX, 65g, stiff 7W: G410 SFT, set to 22*. Alta CB 65 Red, stiff Irons: GMax, Green Dot, 5-PW, Project X Graphite Blue 6.0, 80-90g , stiff Wedges: Glide 2.0 Stealth, 50* SS, 54* ES & 60*/8 Forged MGS Special from the Wedge Wizard, Green Dot, Alta CB graphite, 84g, stiff Putter: Vault 2.0 B60 Copper, 33", black dot w/GP SNSR grip (PING Sigma 2 Fetch under "see-trials") Ball: MTB BLACK (MGS Official 2018 Tester for the MTB RED) Shoes: Classics Tour w/Black Widow Softspikes Disabled Marine Veteran. Semper Fi! #No apologies, just Play Your Best #Powertotheplayers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.