Shot Scope vs. Arccos

[Paul Hedrick]

I was a tester in 2021 for the Arccos system.  It performed well for me after a learning curve on my part.  Yes, there were some missed shots, but those lessoned once I figured it out.  When the subscription period was over, I switched to Shot Scope.  The idea of purchasing it once, and not having a subscription, was appealing to me.  Shot Scoped performed well for me, again, after a learning curve on my part.  I came to a point though where it was pretty clear, after a period of time, that I needed to replace the sensors. About that time Shot Scope released a new wearable watch as well.  Reading the reviews, and everyone's experience with it, it did not sound like something I felt I would take a gamble on.  I made the decision to move back t Arccos.  At that time Arccos was having a great 'deal', which was less expensive than the 'deal' from Shot Scope.  Having used both systems, I cannot say I see a clear advantage to either of them, for my game.  I suppose I will keep an eye out on both, and their latest technology, to move forward.

[cnosil]

I guess it depends on what features you want from these devices.  I keep reading about wanting caddie features, weather reports, slope adjustments, step counters, score cards, and many other things.   

I simply want the system to track my shots and display the data to help me identify weaknesses.    This makes both systems about the same and I choose ShotScope due to the lack of subscription.   

[Mayor McCheese]

I’m right there with you - I went with Shot Scope simply because I’d rather spend my money on rounds of golf than a subscription fee.