What suits your eye at address?

[GolfSpy Dave]

Pinseeker and Confidence. I know they aren't great companies but why try those out when you love the look of the wedges you have?

Have not hit either one and it sounds like I shouldn't so thanks for that.

[DJNiich]

Have not hit either one and it sounds like I shouldn't so thanks for that.

Ya. Won them in scramble tourneys. No control over them just big and heavy.

[jamo]

Ya. Won them in scramble tourneys. No control over them just big and heavy.

 

So you don't like them? I sort of like the heavier wedges that I have tried, but short shots are very hard.

[Addicted2Golf]

Here's one for wedges ... which one looks better to you at address?

 

The top one and before you say anything... it was before I scrolled down and read that it was a Vokey.

 

I prefer a less rounded look at address for my wedges. That is particularly true of the leading edge.

[Addicted2Golf]

Ya. Won them in scramble tourneys. No control over them just big and heavy.

 

Meh. I gamed Pinseeker irons for a short while when I got back into golf seven years ago. OK, for beginners but not great stuff otherwise.

[NGage]

 

Here's one for wedges ... which one looks better to you at address?

 

See....I look at those and see no incredibly discernible differences. Yes, maybe there are some small things...but just not enough for me to care. I'm gonna play either one of those if they feel good and perform as I want.

[lmh3]

Have many visual conditions that clubs need to meet for me to put them in the bag:

 

Driver: No alignment mark on the crown, I want the club to have a clean look. An open club face is also a must, at least one degree, but two is ideal. Lastly, a deeper face is a requirement for me as well.

 

Fairways: Same as the driver, although a slightly shallower face is not a deal breaker.

 

Hybrid: Minimal to no offset, no alignment mark on the top. I'm not crazy about the two tone color scheme on the Peanut that I am testing, but since they are two shades of grey, it isn't so bad.

 

Irons: Minimal offset, thin top line and a don't like the heel to hosel transition on the pitching wedge in Titleist or Mizuno iron sets (not sure why, but they bug me out).

 

Wedges: I prefer the shape of the Vokey wedges, but I am not too particular with these clubs, I can work with almost anything.

 

Putter: Heel shafted is a must.

[golfermax78]

I'm a fan of the one on the right (pretty sure it's a titleist, but who knows) I'm not a fan of hybrids that have an overly bulgy, round face. I just feel like if i miss it at all the ball will be 50 yards right or left

[scharff01]

In both cases I prefer the ones on the right as well.

[Moecat]

Thought I would keep this thread going.

 

Which putter suits your eye better at address? (next post: 2 drivers)

 

[GolfSpy Dave]

Silver head.

[Moecat]

Here are two different drivers ... which appeals to you more at address?

 

[Super Tuna]

The one on the left both times

[Matt Saternus]

The black putter - offset seems less

 

The non-Titleist is the one I prefer of the two drivers.

[The GreekGrind]

RAZR X Tour

 

Diablo Forged

[Matt Saternus]

The Razr X Tour is a very decent looking club. The Diablo Forged is ok, but not as nice, IMO.

[The GreekGrind]

The Razr X Tour is a very decent looking club. The Diablo Forged is ok, but not as nice, IMO.

I agree with you about the RAZR X Tour irons. I think people will be very impressed with them, and their looks, especially people who like clubs with very little offset. The RAZR X Tour irons actually have almost as little offset as the RAZR X Forged irons.

 

I myself don't mind offset at all. And the Diablo Forged, while they definitely have some, don't have as much as the X22s or X24s (which had a lot), and have less than the older FT irons.

 

I'm really pleased with Callaways current iron offerings. I know reasonable people will disagree, but I really like how they play, feel, and look.