Jump to content
GolfSpy MPR

NPG Episode 42: Should The Golf Ball Be Rolled Back?

Recommended Posts

Our Sponsors

2 minutes ago, RickyBobby_PR said:

Is distance really limited by the rules? 

Bryson added distance by improving speed and optimizing launch conditions to match the speed under the current rules. DJ and other pros have picked up speed thru improved ball speed while their drivers and ball still fall within the rules.

Matt from TXG had better distance with sim over m5 and both drivers fall in the rules.

Ball speed is limited under a specific testing regimen.  COR of driver heads is limited.  Those are both intended to limit the distance that equipment alone can provide.   But absolute distance is not limited, as that depends on factors that are completely beyond regulation, including a players physical attributes, swing techniques, club optimization, course conditions, etc.  The Ruling Bodies have long had a role in regulating equipment, and will continue to do so, but they cannot regulate all of those other factors.


:titelist-small: Irons Titleist AP2 714, KBS Tour S, 3 flat

:callaway-small: Rogue SubZero, GD YS-Six X

:vokey-small: 52, 56, and 60 wedges

:ping-small: B60 G5i putter

Right handed

Reston, Virginia

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Middler said:

OK, then what’s your alternative since this is a thread on dealing with the distance question?

Hope you are having a good day.  Some of the greatest pros in golf feel that the USGA and the R&A should use flight restricted golf balls.  Restricting the distance of the golf ball had been done before so a precedent has been set. An example being  a golf ball can't be a smaller diameter than The Rules of golf specify.  Dunlap made a ball that was smaller and bore through the wind that the pros used to play.  Softball is a sport that uses flight restricted balls.  To many home runs.  If flight restricted softballs are not used It would mean bigger fields would be needed so that more hit balls will be in play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I ended up mucking about with a Callaway Magma. I was quite interested in how it performed against a Supersoft.

I wonder if the way around all the IP but to still maintain the one set of rules, reduce distance... increase the minimum ball size.

Easier to hit, but increased size therefore increase wind resistance so cant hit as far, and increase spin (???), but Bridgestone can still use all their patents.


:cobra-small:King LTD 9*, Accra FX100 M3 45"/ King F8 9*, Accra FX200 M4 44" + 15g
,:cobra-small:King LTD 13*, Accra FX100 M3 42.5"
:cobra-small:F9+ 17.5*, Accra FX100 M3 40.5"
:cobra-small:King F8 OL 4-PW, Rogue Pro Iron 75 Regular 36"
:cobra-small:
King F8 OL GW-LW Rogue Pro Iron 85 Regular 36"
Lajosi-White2.jpg.2c9fd63a6e850be7bbf7177771c5ed8e.jpg Custom DD201WB Armlock (450g, 8*, 72* Upright, 40"), BGT Stability Shaft
:bridgestone-small: 2020 Tour B RX
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...